What is the big safety flaw?
I know nothing about the jet (except it looks to small!) but I have heard many times it had flawed/ cheated certification. But what is deadly about it?
Well, understand safety flaws aren't always the V tails coming off the plane or the avionics + FMS taking a dump... like an Airbus 330 that will remain nameless. Oops.
Some of the notable (public) flaws have been:
-The de-icing and anti icing system slipping in and out of certification x3
-Three different avionics packages during the last 2 years because none could pass
-The spray paint, no i'm not kidding, issue on finished products and they couldn't figure out why the radio's wouldn't work
-The metal fuel caps on the composite wings... BOOM. Then the fuel cap issue again. Then the fuel cap issue again. Then the fuel cap issue again. wait how many times was that... 1, 2, 3, 4... Then the fuel cap issue again. There 5.
-FSDO swapping
-Trying to individually certify each plane that came off the assembly line because Eclipse didn't know what an assembly cert. was... or at least pretended to.
-Group of all test pilots and many test and design engineers blowing the whistle on Eclipse, causing a complete certification review, which I have yet to hear the conclusion of.
-IFR cert failing miserably and the company coming out the very next week with the "Hey at least we can get it VFR typed, that means it's at least as good as an RV-6".
Many engineers were so in shock at some of the original designs of this thing (electrically and structurally) that a bias has persisted in the community of engineers against Eclipse. Like trying to tell Eclipse that, "I understand it was promised to you that composite's bond well, but they mean structural bonding NOT electrical bonding..... See we talked about this for years now and I don't think you understand... No we can't just make it happen.... no it doesn't matter that bill gates and Cheney are your friends.... It still won't pass... That's why it didn't pass... I have to go now, I'm sorry." (previous conversation was a bit embellished)
Now business wise and PR wise and, unfortunately, pilot magazine wise, you'd have thought this thing was a huge success. This is one time, when non-engineers (businesspeople and pilots and writers) are gonna be looking at this from the outside in.
I hear it flies fine, day VFR.
EDIT:
sorry should have put the throttle quadrant and fadec thing in there too. There is a big list.