SlumTodd_Millionaire
Most Hated Member
The truth isn't always happy-go-lucky. But someone has to say it.
The truth isn't always happy-go-lucky. But someone has to say it.
And say it...and say it....and say it....and say it.
If other people want to keep passing out rose colored glasses, I think it's only responsible for someone else to hand out clear ones.
I think most people on here have a pretty healthy understanding of what is going on.
So for those of us who are going to have to live with the consequences, you're pretty much debbie downer.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say you've probably been called much much worse.I don't think so.
I'm ok with that title, then.
I don't think so.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say you've probably been called much much worse.
What specifically in this thread lead you to that conclusion?
You know, folks, when you replace 50 seaters with 150 seaters, and there is no capacity increase, the number of jobs just shrunk by two thirds. Sure, the jobs that are left are better jobs, but a lot of people are left out in the cold.
Not saying that it's not a good thing. Just pointing out that everything won't be roses like some people think.
Currently 50 seaters are being replaced by 115 seaters, and at a company that doesn't think that less than 10 pilots per plane is proper staffing. So... well your math is considerably off thus far.![]()
Oh, and drawing conclusions off of what Trip7 says isn't super accurate
Regional Pilots have an unprecedented amount of leverage right now.
You'll get coal and like it. You're owned by Delta afterall. Good luck to Eagle.We may not have leverage, but we might as well shut em down. All I want for Christmas is a fair contract.
It can be profitable. Mainline just doesn't want to do what it takes to make it profitable. A few extra dollars on the fare can make a large difference.I wouldn't exactly use the term "guilty." They're paying the price that the benefit of the feed justifies. Paying more isn't profitable, so it wouldn't be worthwhile.