DOJ Approves VA/AS

you can't until you do.....

i mean seriously what does VX bring to the table? Their career expectations just skyrocketed because of you guys

Actually, their career expectations may have gone down slightly. Upgrade will be (potentially) slower for an VX FO post merger than before. Otherwise the carriers are identical.
 
Seriously?

AS's career expectation is to fly a 737 transon and to HI.

VX's career expectation is to fly an A320 transcon and to HI.

No difference. Pay rates, markets, fleets, size of pilot groups, upgrade times are not part of the equation.
no mater what someone is going to have a good argument they got screwed. It's either going to be the AS captain who has been there 25 years placed next to a captain at VX whose been there for 4 years. OR it will be the VX senior captain who is now going to be barely holding onto a line as an FO.
 
I highly doubt that there are going to be a line of senior Virgin pilots that want to grab those sweet, sweet Arctic day trips from the Alaska old timers. And even if there were, that's why any merger these days has fences etc. there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, lots of whining on the Internet, and in the end everything will work out and @Rocketman99 and @Cherokee_Cruiser will both keep drinking beer and flying jets
 
you can't until you do.....

i mean seriously what does VX bring to the table? Their career expectations just skyrocketed because of you guys


Actually, their career expectations may have gone down slightly. Upgrade will be (potentially) slower for an VX FO post merger than before. Otherwise the carriers are identical.

My understanding is that this is not "career expectations" as per the ALPA merger policy. After the UAL-US Airways potential merger of 2000, I believe (though someone can correct me if I'm wrong) that the sole definition of what a "career expectation" is relates to narrowbody versus widebody. So in this merger, both "career expectations" are the same: domestic mainline narrowbody aircraft.

Seriously?

AS's career expectation is to fly a 737 transon and to HI.

VX's career expectation is to fly an A320 transcon and to HI.

No difference. Pay rates, markets, fleets, size of pilot groups, upgrade times are not part of the equation.

For career expecation part, yes. But in the merger I went through before, an arbitrator is most likely going to favor Alaska in ratios for "bringing the more meaningful contract, pay raises, and staffing ratios" that benefit VX."

no mater what someone is going to have a good argument they got screwed. It's either going to be the AS captain who has been there 25 years placed next to a captain at VX whose been there for 4 years. OR it will be the VX senior captain who is now going to be barely holding onto a line as an FO.

Or the most realistic scenario, something well inside the middle of those two extremes.

FYI, there are no 4 yr CAs here. I'll be 5 yrs in two more months and I'm not even close. Actually, I'd argue that for pax carriers, after Southwest and Alaska Airlines, Virgin America has the most senior upgrade. 5 yrs seniority can hold CA at just about every other pax airline. Spirit, Allegiant, Sun Country, Frontier, Delta, American (E190), jetBlue. And perhaps Hawaiian (?), Continental/United (?), not sure if these two have any CAs DOH 2011.
 
And even if there were, that's why any merger these days has fences etc.

Ask some LAX based LUAL 777 pilots about those sweet, sweet fences.

FYI, there are no 4 yr CAs here. I'll be 5 yrs in two more months and I'm not even close. Actually, I'd argue that for pax carriers, after Southwest and Alaska Airlines, Virgin America has the most senior upgrade. 5 yrs seniority can hold CA at just about every other pax airline. Spirit, Allegiant, Sun Country, Frontier, Delta, American (E190), jetBlue. And perhaps Hawaiian (?), Continental/United (?), not sure if these two have any CAs DOH 2011.

Hawaiian is at about 7 years right now. Bid that came out today pushes that down to 6 maybe, effective by August.
 
My understanding is that this is not "career expectations" as per the ALPA merger policy. After the UAL-US Airways potential merger of 2000, I believe (though someone can correct me if I'm wrong) that the sole definition of what a "career expectation" is relates to narrowbody versus widebody. So in this merger, both "career expectations" are the same: domestic mainline narrowbody aircraft.



For career expecation part, yes. But in the merger I went through before, an arbitrator is most likely going to favor Alaska in ratios for "bringing the more meaningful contract, pay raises, and staffing ratios" that benefit VX."



Or the most realistic scenario, something well inside the middle of those two extremes.

FYI, there are no 4 yr CAs here. I'll be 5 yrs in two more months and I'm not even close. Actually, I'd argue that for pax carriers, after Southwest and Alaska Airlines, Virgin America has the most senior upgrade. 5 yrs seniority can hold CA at just about every other pax airline. Spirit, Allegiant, Sun Country, Frontier, Delta, American (E190), jetBlue. And perhaps Hawaiian (?), Continental/United (?), not sure if these two have any CAs DOH 2011.
I was just trying to see how spun up I could get you...nice restraint
 
Last edited:
I highly doubt that there are going to be a line of senior Virgin pilots that want to grab those sweet, sweet Arctic day trips from the Alaska old timers. And even if there were, that's why any merger these days has fences etc. there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, lots of whining on the Internet, and in the end everything will work out and @Rocketman99 and @Cherokee_Cruiser will both keep drinking beer and flying jets
No fences in the US and AA merger.
 
My understanding is that this is not "career expectations" as per the ALPA merger policy. After the UAL-US Airways potential merger of 2000, I believe (though someone can correct me if I'm wrong) that the sole definition of what a "career expectation" is relates to narrowbody versus widebody. So in this merger, both "career expectations" are the same: domestic mainline narrowbody aircraft.



For career expecation part, yes. But in the merger I went through before, an arbitrator is most likely going to favor Alaska in ratios for "bringing the more meaningful contract, pay raises, and staffing ratios" that benefit VX."



Or the most realistic scenario, something well inside the middle of those two extremes.

FYI, there are no 4 yr CAs here. I'll be 5 yrs in two more months and I'm not even close. Actually, I'd argue that for pax carriers, after Southwest and Alaska Airlines, Virgin America has the most senior upgrade. 5 yrs seniority can hold CA at just about every other pax airline. Spirit, Allegiant, Sun Country, Frontier, Delta, American (E190), jetBlue. And perhaps Hawaiian (?), Continental/United (?), not sure if these two have any CAs DOH 2011.
Arbitrary numbers, but get ready to hear about that argument one way or the others. "I had XX years at Alaska and they put some guy who had X years at Virgin right next to me."
 
I was just trying to see how spun up I could get you...nice restraint

This upcoming merger, I'm not gonna be like last time around. No way, not worth it. All that screamin and beotching can't, won't, and doesn't change the outcome.

Plus, I'm also in the rare "good" spot that both relative and DOH methodologies put me at the same position. Both VX and AS had decent hiring sprees starting 2011/12 onwards. I'm not saying it would be relative or DOH, most likely a ratio method like XJ/9E/9L were. Still, I can't see myself losing much in the SLI.
 
I'm at the bottom of the VX list but AS has hired since I started, all I hope for is DOH post announcement (since April). I think as far as SLIs go, as long as nobody is happy, it's a good one.
 
I'm at the bottom of the VX list but AS has hired since I started, all I hope for is DOH post announcement (since April). I think as far as SLIs go, as long as nobody is happy, it's a good one.

You're in front of those pilots by default, as they're constructive notice third listers.
 
AA/US integrated post merger. This ended up kinda screwing me as I had a lot of buds hired after merger announcement but before the merger close. Now they are thousands above me. Sucks but what can you do.
 
Isn't AA/US a little bit of an exception because of the long time between merger announcement and actual merger close date? VX/AS announcement was April 4 and looks like the merger will close this month. If I had to guess, the snapshot date for SLI post-merger constructive pilots in DOH order will be April 4 onwards.
 
Aa/us was 2/14 to 12/9. May have had a case for the 2/14 date until the injunction which put the merger in doubt until 12/9.
 
giphy.gif



Different Works:

http://www.differentworks.com/
 
Back
Top