"Customer is always right" questioned

Nick

Well-Known Member
I got this from the forum that is populated by people whom I work with. I am not sure where it came from because no source was given in that post, but I googled it and found it elsewhere on the internet including
http://positivesharing.com/2006/07/why-the-customer-is-always-right-results-in-bad-customer-service/

I agree with the majority of it. How 'bout you?



When the customer isn’t right - for your business

One woman who frequently flew on Southwest, was constantly disappointed with every aspect of the company’s operation. In fact, she became known as the “Pen Pal” because after every flight she wrote in with a complaint.

She didn’t like the fact that the company didn’t assign seats; she didn’t like the absence of a first-class section; she didn’t like not having a meal in flight; she didn’t like Southwest’s boarding procedure; she didn’t like the flight attendants’ sporty uniforms and the casual atmosphere.

Her last letter, reciting a litany of complaints, momentarily stumped Southwest’s customer relations people. They bumped it up to Herb’s [Kelleher, CEO of Southwest] desk, with a note: ‘This one’s yours.’

In sixty seconds, Kelleher wrote back and said, ‘Dear Mrs. Crabapple, We will miss you. Love, Herb.’”

The phrase “The customer is always right” was originally coined by Harry Gordon Selfridge, the founder of Selfridge’s department store in London in 1909, and is typically used by businesses to:

1. Convince customers that they will get good service at this company
2. Convince employees to give customers good service

Fortunately more and more businesses are abandoning this maxim - ironically because it leads to bad customer service.

Here are the top five reasons why “The customer is always right” is wrong.

1: It makes employees unhappy

Gordon Bethune is a brash Texan (as is Herb Kelleher, coincidentally) who is best known for turning Continental Airlines around “From Worst to First,” a story told in his book of the same title from 1998. He wanted to make sure that both customers and employees liked the way Continental treated them, so he made it very clear that the maxim “the customer is always right” didn’t hold sway at Continental.

In conflicts between employees and unruly customers he would consistently side with his people. Here’s how he puts it:

When we run into customers that we can’t reel back in, our loyalty is with our employees. They have to put up with this stuff every day. Just because you buy a ticket does not give you the right to abuse our employees . . .

We run more than 3 million people through our books every month. One or two of those people are going to be unreasonable, demanding jerks. When it’s a choice between supporting your employees, who work with you every day and make your product what it is, or some irate jerk who demands a free ticket to Paris because you ran out of peanuts, whose side are you going to be on?

You can’t treat your employees like serfs. You have to value them . . . If they think that you won’t support them when a customer is out of line, even the smallest problem can cause resentment.

So Bethune trusts his people over unreasonable customers. What I like about this attitude is that it balances employees and customers, where the “always right” maxim squarely favors the customer - which is not a good idea, because, as Bethune says, it causes resentment among employees.

Of course there are plenty of examples of bad employees giving lousy customer service. But trying to solve this by declaring the customer “always right” is counter-productive.


2: It gives abrasive customers an unfair

Using the slogan “The customer is always right” abusive customers can demand just about anything - they’re right by definition, aren’t they? This makes the employees’ job that much harder, when trying to rein them in.

Also, it means that abusive people get better treatment and conditions than nice people. That always seemed wrong to me, and it makes much more sense to be nice to the nice customers to keep them coming back.

3: Some customers are bad for business

Most businesses think that “the more customers the better”. But some customers are quite simply bad for business.

Danish IT service provider ServiceGruppen proudly tell this story:

One of our service technicians arrived at a customer’s site for a maintenance task, and to his great shock was treated very rudely by the customer.

When he’d finished the task and returned to the office, he told management about his experience. They promptly cancelled the customer’s contract.

Just like Kelleher dismissed the irate lady who kept complaining (but somehow also kept flying on Southwest), ServiceGruppen fired a bad customer. Note that it was not even a matter of a financial calculation - not a question of whether either company would make or lose money on that customer in the long run. It was a simple matter of respect and dignity and of treating their employees right.

4: It results in worse customer service

Rosenbluth International, a corporate travel agency, took it even further. CEO Hal Rosenbluth wrote an excellent book about their approach called Put The Customer Second - Put your people first and watch’em kick butt.

Rosenbluth argues that when you put the employees first, they put the customers first. Put employees first, and they will be happy at work. Employees who are happy at work give better customer service because:

* They care more about other people, including customers
* They have more energy
* They are happy, meaning they are more fun to talk to and interact with
* They are more motivated

On the other hand, when the company and management consistently side with customers instead of with employees, it sends a clear message that:

* Employees are not valued
* That treating employees fairly is not important
* That employees have no right to respect from customers
* That employees have to put up with everything from customers

When this attitude prevails, employees stop caring about service. At that point, real good service is almost impossible - the best customers can hope for is fake good service. You know the kind I mean: corteous on the surface only.

5: Some customers are just plain wrong

Herb Kelleher agrees, as this passage From Nuts! the excellent book about Southwest Airlines shows:

Herb Kelleher […] makes it clear that his employees come first — even if it means dismissing customers. But aren’t customers always right? “No, they are not,” Kelleher snaps. “And I think that’s one of the biggest betrayals of employees a boss can possibly commit. The customer is sometimes wrong. We don’t carry those sorts of customers. We write to them and say, ‘Fly somebody else. Don’t abuse our people.’”

If you still think that the customer is always right, read this story from Bethune’s book “From Worst to First”:

A Continental flight attendant once was offended by a passenger’s child wearing a hat with Nazi and KKK emblems on it. It was pretty offensive stuff, so the attendant went to the kid’s father and asked him to put away the hat. “No,” the guy said. “My kid can wear what he wants, and I don’t care who likes it.”

The flight attendant went into the cockpit and got the first officer, who explained to the passenger the FAA regulation that makes it a crime to interfere with the duties of a crew member. The hat was causing other passengers and the crew discomfort, and that interfered with the flight attendant’s duties. The guy better put away the hat.

He did, but he didn’t like it. He wrote many nasty letters. We made every effort to explain our policy and the federal air regulations, but he wasn’t hearing it. He even showed up in our executive suite to discuss the matter with me. I let him sit out there. I didn’t want to see him and I didn’t want to listen to him. He bought a ticket on our airplane, and that means we’ll take him where he wants to go. But if he’s going to be rude and offensive, he’s welcome to fly another airline.

The fact is that some customers are just plain wrong, that businesses are better of without them, and that managers siding with unreasonable customers over employees is a very bad idea, that results in worse customer service.

So put your people first. And watch them put the customers first.
 
I get a small business magazine for some reason... I don't own a small business, and I never went to a business school... but an article in the last issue about this very same thing caught my eye, so I actually read it.

The gist is this... you really should bend over backward for your customers... The better you treat them the more they'll want to come back, but you should also take into account how much time you're spending doing things that go above and beyond.

One woman, for example, got rid of one "time consuming" customer, and picked up three good customers.
 
The fact is that some customers are just plain wrong

I doubt that anyone seriously accepted "The customer is always right" as an absolute, but it's certainly a good policy for front-line people. The person who decides the customer is wrong and isn't worth keeping should be made by those with a higher-level view, and who aren't personally involved.

So put your people first. And watch them put the customers first.
One of my students was a customer service representative at a local Cadillac dealer. He firmly believed in the theory stated, but he said that the dealership he worked for treated its employees like dirt. However, the dealership was consistently voted #1 in customer satisfaction in the city. Clearly, bringing about a desired result is a combination of many different factors and no one factor is essential or sufficient.
 
It is a good article -- for higher level management types. "Customer is always right" is a good maxim for those on the front-lines. Clearly some customers are too much of a PITA to keep around, and there are valid reasons for firing one from time to time. But it shouldn't be rank-and-file who are making that call. In other words, any business must bend over backwards to satisfy even unreasonable customers. But there is a line.
 
I'm running out the door for a weekend of flying, so I can't read the article in its entirety, but I CAN say that pax in this area (EWR) are verrrry slick and will write complaint letters since they know they'll be compensated somehow or other. The shame of it is we have to get phone calls from our supervisors telling us that we've had complaints lodged against our flight crews with the vaguest of comments such as "your FA's weren't up to the usual CO standards." WTF does THAT mean? We're not to someone's physical taste? C'mon....It pisses us off no end that we are not given the benefit of the doubt and we're told said complaint letters will be put in our "file." Yeah, whatever. All I know is most of us bust our asses every day for EVERY pax, whether they're nice or PITA's. Part of the customer service industry, I suppose. I do take offense to being "accused" when there is no specific complaint lodged, though. OK, rant over...
 
Many customers, such as the one mentioned in this article, can never be satisfied. They have been conditioned to believe that the more they whine and complain the more "freebies" they will be given. If you shut them down the first time and make them realize that NOTHING IN LIFE IS FREE, they will quit making ridiculous complaints. If you give them what they want when they do not have a legitimate comlplaint, they will most definatley remember that and you will deal with them again.
 
That was a pretty good article, actually.

It is, and it should be required reading for every one who manages people. I left a job where the customer was clearly wrong, as well as deceptive and fraudalent. I had definitive proof of his deception, and management still didn't go to bat for me, and sided with the customer. This showed me how much the company valued it's people, so I immediately began to look for another job, found one and left a few weeks later. The company lost a hard-working, high producing employee, and I moved on to something better.
 
The airlines are a different kind of business, from a Wal-Mart, or some store in the mall. Your typical passenger does not understand how certain things can effect an airline's operation. I do not believe the "customer is always right", applies to the airlines, most of the time. Myself, being a CSA, I've encountered some extremely unruly passengers, who try to tell me what I am supposed to do, or not supposed to do, as though they somehow know my job, better than me.

For those of you who fly for XJT or CAL, and were in, and out of IAH last Tuesday; you remember the high winds that day. In BTR, we had all of our flights cancelled that day, due to this, as well as the high winds in BTR. We had several passengers pull out their blackberries, and start trying to show us the weather radar, to let us know that there is no weather in the area, and that we are lying. The customer is not always right, at least when it comes to airlines. Fortunately, the manager and supervisors at the station I work, back us, the employees, up, when it comes to people like that. We are a customer service industry, and our job is to serve the customer, but that doesn't mean they get everything they want. You have to draw the line somewhere, especially when dealing with the airlines. There is a big difference between giving someone a huge voucher, because they pull their blackberry up, and accuse us of lying about weather, and giving someone a discount, because the item they are trying to buy had a price tag, on it, of $1.99, instead of $2.99.
 
Without passengers, the passenger airlines would not exist. So of course we should try our very hardest to do whatever we can to help them. Obviously, everything they may sometimes want, will not be in our power/control to do.

I believe in being polite and professional towards the pax at all times, even when they're being unreasonable. That doesn't mean giving them what they're asking for all the time, because that's just not always possible.

The customer is not always right. But, they are still always the customer.

Even in the above examples where a CEO tells a pax their business is no longer wanted, it's said in a polite manner and still using manners.
 
I'm really glad to see that article challenging the "customer is always right" mantra.

Part of the problem is that at least two or three generations of consumers have been raised to think that they are entitled to compensation whenever things go less than perfectly, whether an honest mistake has been made or not, usually accomodated by companies who do embrace that philosophy.

There's a fairly famous story of a woman who tried to return a set of tires she bought to Nordstrom's. Nordstrom's accepted the return and gave her a refund and she was happy.

Nevermind that Nordstrom's doesn't sell tires.
 
The customer is always right, but only if they have an iphone to direct the pilots in weather decisions.
 
I don't think the "customer is always right" is a good policy for front line customer service people. This is coming from someone that worked in training at Disney, Universal Orlando and Sea World, and worked as a CSA for XJT. Why? B/c if people assume (or worse, know) this is your policy, they'll do whatever they can to get a free ride.

Now, don't take it to the extreme and treat customers like dirt. But bending over backwards for an obvious • is a good way to lose a lot of your staff. If you get a front-line manager that doesn't back up his employees b/c "the customer is always right," your gonna lose people, too. Surefire way to have bad customer service is to always have a good chunk of your staff in training.
 
I hate this policy with a passion. I was a customer service rep at Best Buy for two years and we followed it to a T. We had a policy that required certain conditions be met for me to accept a return/exchange. I would follow the policy as instructed or face being written up. However, once a customer demanded a manager, which they almost always did when they did not get their way, 90% of the time the manager would go against what I said making me look like a liar. I only had one manager that would back us and would actually tell customers their business is no longer wanted if they got out of control.

The worst case I ever saw was a woman had just bought a new LCD tv a week before. She brought it in complaining the cable jack in the back was ripped out from the factory. I, using the evidence available, concluded that she put it on a table and knocked it over. Mark on the front of the TV, jack pulled down and out and the fact that she no longer had the box make pretty convincing argument against her case. Management, after only 3 mins of listening to her not only gave her a brand new tv but a $50 gift card for her "inconvenience" since she had to bring the tv back. The TV she returned was thrown away and the price deducted from our shrink count for the month.
 
I hate this policy with a passion. I was a customer service rep at Best Buy for two years and we followed it to a T. We had a policy that required certain conditions be met for me to accept a return/exchange. I would follow the policy as instructed or face being written up. However, once a customer demanded a manager, which they almost always did when they did not get their way, 90% of the time the manager would go against what I said making me look like a liar. I only had one manager that would back us and would actually tell customers their business is no longer wanted if they got out of control.

The worst case I ever saw was a woman had just bought a new LCD tv a week before. She brought it in complaining the cable jack in the back was ripped out from the factory. I, using the evidence available, concluded that she put it on a table and knocked it over. Mark on the front of the TV, jack pulled down and out and the fact that she no longer had the box make pretty convincing argument against her case. Management, after only 3 mins of listening to her not only gave her a brand new tv but a $50 gift card for her "inconvenience" since she had to bring the tv back. The TV she returned was thrown away and the price deducted from our shrink count for the month.

This is what annoys me. I have had incidents, where I have had to deny a passenger's request, because it is against policy. On more than one occasion, I have had a specific supervisor then come in, and give that person what they wanted, against policy, and worst of all, making me look like a liar. The last time this happened, I basically told the supervisor to find someone else to come work up here (I was the gate agent), and I walked off. I was extremely pissed! The supervisor later apologized to me, but has had HR involved in investigating her, four times, due to complaints against her, for stuff like this, and much more. It is bad enough that front line employees have to deal with irate, rude customers, to begin with, but add into the mix, a supervisor, or manager, who does not back you up, and it quickly becomes a dread to go to work. Kellwolf is right; that is the quickest way to lose employees. I am getting laid off from my job, as an airline CSA, and I am counting the days until the last day. I, as well as most employees at my station, are fed up with the BS that has to be put up with, for $8.75hr!

I don’t want to think about the money that had been lost by companies; airlines, Best Buy, etc., due to this, “Customer is always right”, policy.
 
Thanks for posting this! Great article. I once went to a seminar for dealing with demanding customers and they echo'ed some of what was said. The customer is always right implies that the employee is an indentured servant.
The thing that bugs me about "the customer is aways right" most is how in encourages people to be jerks. IMO, why reward people for being a pain?
 
I have read both Herb kelleher and Gordon Bethune's books and they are both good books. But I couldn't disagree with the author of this article more. If giving good customer service makes your employees unhappy, then you have done a poor job of hiring, training, and instilling a corporate culture of customer service in your employees. I haven't had an employee yet who didn't enjoy getting a letter from a satisfied customer praising the service he received.

I simply don't see anything incompatible with good customer service and treating your employee's well. This article makes it seem as if the two are incompatible.
 
I simply don't see anything incompatible with good customer service and treating your employee's well. This article makes it seem as if the two are incompatible.

Depends on how you do it. You can treat your employees well, but if your "good customer service" is giving whomever whatever they want, eventually your employees will get ticked off as they see the scam artists, whiners and abusive customers get whatever they want as they walk away with a sneer on their faces. A killer 401K, good health benes and decent pay can't offset that.
 
Back
Top