How many hours does it take on average and is it really worth getting? I'm thinking about getting it just in case I wanna use it, but is it really worth it for a PPL?
My CFI said I was ready to be signed off at around 4 hours, but I needed 10 hours complex to solo the airplane for insurance requirements. Because of the insurance requirement, I didn't get it until I logged the 10 hours complex.
You need it for the CPL. You don't need anything other than a CFI's signature, but what really matters is how many hours the FBO's insurance company will require you to have.
There is no good reason to do it other than getting the C-ASEL. Even then, it probably makes more sense to do it in a twin.
You could get the DPE to agree to be the PIC for the portion of the flight in the complex airplane. However, its unlikely to find a DPE to do so.
That is crap. You can be signed off for the endorsement and just not rent it.
My taildragger was in a dual-only aircraft (no rentals). Same thing, a signoff to solo an aircraft we won't let you solo.
I got mine in 4 hours, in a Aviat Husky. Lots of fun.
I'm on the "eh, if I get the hours in my spare time and the field opens up after college" track.Are you on a career track?
If you have a complex aircraft that you want to fly, I would do it, but if not I'd just wait for the commercial. As said.
If you are not planning to getting the commercial, I would say do it. Never stop learning. It's not very long and it can be really fun.
Isn't that fixed gear? Or did you do it in an Amphib?
I'm on the "eh, if I get the hours in my spare time and the field opens up after college" track.
1. It's not a ratingIn my mind it is a pointless rating and I think the FAA should just get rid of it.
1. It's not a rating
2. Really?
You could use the same logic for the multiengine rating or the ATP.Okay, pointless endorsement. Insurance companies have effectively set a higher bar for complex training than the FAA already.
You could use the same logic for the multiengine rating or the ATP.