Commercial Knowledge Exam

Coney

New Member
Before I started working on the commercial certificate (ASEL), people told me it would be the easiest certificate I'd earn. I've not yet begun the flying portion of my training. Rather, I'm studying for the written exam; I plan to knock it out first. Holy Toledo! There's a LOT of info to know, if I plan on doing well on the exam (which I do). Anyway, I'm just wondering if the flying portion is easier or goes faster than the written exam portion. Does anyone have any insight or an opinion? Thanks!
 
Not really, when you think about it. It's like a condensed PPL. There are about 50, sometimes less, questions per chapter in the Gleim setup. It's actually pretty easy, I just am being a slacker and haven't studied for it yet. Lots of College junk to worry about.

Good luck to you.
 
Yeah. I understand, man. My fatigue is probably from all the other stuff I'm balancing (i.e., job, family, finances, etc.), rather than the studying. I've been using the Gleim book too, and it has been really helpful. I'm just impatient. I want it behind me.
grin.gif
 
Once you dig down into the written, it all sounds really familiar. It's kinda good if you know the theory behind it all since it makes it easier, and kinda bad if you just memorize the answers. Some of the questions are so similar, they'll even throw in the PPL answer as a choice. There's normally a slight change to the question making the PPL answer wrong this time around, but it gets a lot of people.
 
I hear you 110%. I hate the •ING performance chart questions, the aerodynamic and the weather questions.
 
Let me go a little deeper here. In my extremely humble 200 hour pilot mind I think that the Commercial Written and air test should focus A LOT on ADM and dealing with certain situations.

For example, on the commerical written why ask questions FROM the PPL? If I can't figure out a performance chart, figure out something with the weather, or understand how my plane works I should not be flying.

The oral and practial should be based largely on situations that you might be put in as a commercial pilot. The examiner should give you a scenario such as a difficult passenger, open door, etc and see how you deal with it. For example a CFI at my school asked for me to be safety pilot so he can stay instrument current. I went a long for the ride, but before doing so I asked him if I can give him some situtions. While he was holding I called 'my plane' then proceded to turn off the GPS, cover up the backup VOR, the DG, Attitude indicator, and do a few circles to try to get him lost in the approach. Then I opened the airvents on his face so try to distract him some more. This helped him deal with distractions that can occur at a very critical portion of flight. Why can't the FAA make the commercial tests like this?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Then I opened the airvents on his face so try to distract him some more.

[/ QUOTE ]

This wouldn't have phased me. I fly with the air vent turned on my face anyway. Then again I fly in FL......

[ QUOTE ]
Why can't the FAA make the commercial tests like this?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that maybe the Commercial should concentrate more on scenarios rather than rote memorization. Maybe the ATP rating does, but somehow I doubt it. The problem with scenario training is that it's too subjective. What one DE may see as a good answer, another might think is radically stupid. With the current set up, you get a (more or less) consistant test against set standards.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Then I opened the airvents on his face so try to distract him some more.

[/ QUOTE ]

This wouldn't have phased me. I fly with the air vent turned on my face anyway. Then again I fly in FL......

[ QUOTE ]
Why can't the FAA make the commercial tests like this?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that maybe the Commercial should concentrate more on scenarios rather than rote memorization. Maybe the ATP rating does, but somehow I doubt it. The problem with scenario training is that it's too subjective. What one DE may see as a good answer, another might think is radically stupid. With the current set up, you get a (more or less) consistant test against set standards.

[/ QUOTE ]

About the vents, the OAT was 20 degrees F
grin.gif


Definetly see the subjectivity with that type of test. That could be a problem to implement, but I am sure the government could figure something out IF they put their heads together.
 
[ QUOTE ]
....That could be a problem to implement, but I am sure the government could figure something out IF they put their heads together.

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you smoking?




grin.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
....That could be a problem to implement, but I am sure the government could figure something out IF they put their heads together.

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you smoking?




grin.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

just VERY tired
wink.gif
 
Back
Top