OK, two more questions... Well, actually one more question and then a comment:It was unable to depart with the high temperature and high weight (fuel). They either took off planning to land in CLT and were legal, or they took off planning to go to BOS with no contingency fuel, and upon deviating had to plan a divert (to CLT).
It could land in CLT because it takes less fuel to get there.
I kinda get your story there. However... WHY would a plane bound for Boston loaded with Pax bound for Boston elect to take off for Charlotte instead? I mean, ok, maybe you want to help your own self and repo a plane, but how does that make any sense at all from a customer standpoint? "Hey, we'll get you to Charlotte so you can sleep in the airport and MAYBE connect on a flight to Boston tomorrow??" Did they even tell the customers what was going on? If they did, did 25%-40% of the Pax deplane before the plane departed? Were Pax given the option to do so?
And the comment: Sheesh, if you're cutting your fuel planning THAT close (that's a very small percentage difference) I suspect something else is terribly wrong from the git go.