Brief Time Logging Question

Muff3n

Well-Known Member
Hey guys, I have a quick time logging question that I wanted to confirm with the community here since it has been a while since I have dealt with it. If I am flying with a guy on a cross country and the total time is 3.0 hours, say he logs 2.3 hours of hood time. I know that I can log 2.3 hours of PIC time, but no cross country time. Now even though I was only acting as his safety pilot while he was under the hood for the 2.3, do I only log 2.3 hours of total time, or do I log the entire flights total time of 3.0? I just wanted to check and see what you guys had to say about it. Thanks a lot for all of the help.
 
Nope you could only log the 2.3 hours as PIC and TT, because for the 0.7 (taxi time etc) he was PIC and you were basically a passenger.
 
Hey guys, I have a quick time logging question that I wanted to confirm with the community here since it has been a while since I have dealt with it. If I am flying with a guy on a cross country and the total time is 3.0 hours, say he logs 2.3 hours of hood time. I know that I can log 2.3 hours of PIC time, but no cross country time. Now even though I was only acting as his safety pilot while he was under the hood for the 2.3, do I only log 2.3 hours of total time, or do I log the entire flights total time of 3.0? I just wanted to check and see what you guys had to say about it. Thanks a lot for all of the help.

Log only the time you served as safety pilot. If you were acting as pilot in command (ergo, if he busted airspace, you'd be the one to deal with the FAA), then you log that time as PIC. If not, you log it as SIC. 2.3 hours, PIC or SIC, no X-C.

-Fox
 
Log only the time you served as safety pilot. If you were acting as pilot in command (ergo, if he busted airspace, you'd be the one to deal with the FAA), then you log that time as PIC. If not, you log it as SIC. 2.3 hours, PIC or SIC, no X-C.

-Fox

False. SIC time can only be logged if a SIC is required.
 
I'm going to throw a wrench in your scenario for more definitive answers. If I were taxiing, taking off, landing, etc.. the plane for the 3.0, and my friend then put on a hood and became the sole manipulator of the controls for 2.3, I would log 3.0 for everything. He/she would be the one to log 2.3. Now if he/she were doing the ground and pre-hood stuff then I agree 2.3 would be the maximum you could log. Kind of the reverse of the scenario I think you are putting forward. And as I am about to state, Acrofox is completely correct about the SIC time with one way of logging things but I would never do it that way because it is stupid, not saying you are stupid at all Acrofox, it just shows the flaws in the FAA's logic. Anyways, I digress and the evidence and hopefully less rambling is below in the FAA interpretation as of Dec 1, 2009. I left out a bunch of other scenarios and the beginning with the general definition of XC but my point is here:

In your first scenario, Pilot A and Pilot B, who hold private pilot certificates and ratings
appropriate to the aircraft, take a flight. Pilot A acts as the pilot-in-command (PIC). During
a portion of the flight, Pilot B acts as the safety pilot and second-in-command (SIC) while
Pilot A operates in simulated instrument flight. You ask whether Pilot B may log SIC
and/or cross-country time for the portion of the flight during which Pilot B acts as safety
pilot.
Section 61.51 (f) governs the logging of SIC time and states, in relevant part, that a person
may log SIC time only for that flight time during which that person holds the appropriate
ratings for aircraft being flown and "more than one pilot is required under the type
certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted."
When a pilot is operating an aircraft in simulated instrument flight, 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(b), in
relevant part, requires that a safety pilot, who possesses at least a private pilot certificate
with category and class ratings appropriate to the aircraft, occupy the other control seat.
Accordingly, Pilot B may log SIC time for the portion of the flight during which Pilot B acts
as safety pilot because Pilot B was a required flight crewmember for that portion of the
flight under § 91.109(b). The FAA previously has interpreted that a person acting as safety
pilot for a portion of a flight may not log cross-country time because that person is not a
required flight crewmember for the entire flight. See Legal Interpretation to Jeff Gebhart
(June 22,2009) (copy enclosed). Accordingly, Pilot B may not log cross-country time for
any portion of the flight.
The second scenario is similar to the first scenario except that Pilot A is the sole manipulator
of the controls and operates the aircraft in simulated instrument flight during a portion of the
flight. Pilot B acts as the PIC for the flight and as the safety pilot for the portion of the flight
during which Pilot A operates the aircraft in simulated instrument flight. You ask whether
Pilot B may log PIC and/or cross-country time for this flight.
According to the Gebhart interpretation, Pilot A may log PIC and cross-country time for the
entire flight. Pilot B may log PIC time for the portion ofthe flight during which Pilot A
operated in simulated instrument flight because Pilot B was a required flight crewmember
while acting as the safety pilot, but Pilot B may not log cross-country time for any portion of
the flight because Pilot B was not a required flight crewmember for the entire flight.

So, if you accept responsibility as SIC while the other guy is under the hood being sole manipulator of the controls and acting as PIC you can only log SIC. Which again, to Acrofox is not to be offensive in any way, but that is just plain stupid as I am assuming you are both trying to log time and get as much PIC as you can. Scenario 2 allows you to do that by acting as PIC when safety pilot. And if you do it my way as previously stated you can log PIC for the whole flight instead of the 2.3 your friend was under the hood, but that is a deal between you and whoever is paying for the flight and so on. Semantics.

Now I'm going to rant about the XC logging. As you can see above, this FAA interpretation will not allow the safety pilot to log XC in either of these scenarios yet they have said you can either be PIC or SIC, whichever responsibility you decide to take. You obviously should have been at your crew station watching for traffic and ready to act, especially if you were acting as PIC, but you still can't log the time! You basically did the XC too, granted maybe it was a 6 hour XC and you only acted as PIC safety pilot for the 2.3 hours in the middle and really didn't participate in the XC.

I digress again. It is what it is. Careers progress. The more you sit in that flight crew member seat and the more experience you get, the better pilot you will be regardless on whether you can log it. This is way too long for any JCer to read for fun. Kuddos to the curious minds!
 
AAAAAND after rereading. To actually answer your question, yes I would only log 2.3 for the total time since that was your flight time in a pilot position and not a passenger.
 
False. SIC time can only be logged if a SIC is required.

I am so bloody sick of this stupid argument.

From faa.gov but unofficial source, unofficial writing (but BIG FRIENDLY LETTERS):
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...ogram/media/LOGGING PILOT-IN-COMMAND TIME.pdf

Little, more legalese letters, official source, official writing:
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...louis glenn - (2009) legal interpretation.pdf

Not freakin' false. Stop spreading misinformation, people.

-Fox, ears flat
 
Acrofox is completely correct about the SIC time with one way of logging things but I would never do it that way because it is stupid

Log what you like, I don't mind. I'm merely trying to answer the question, as asked, from the point of view of the FARs. If you're my safety pilot in an airplane that I rent, and you want to log PIC time, I have zero problem with that... it's not my logbook. But if TSHTF, I'm going to be the final authority as to where we go or what we do unless otherwise agreed upon. You can have more than one pilot "logging" PIC time, but you can only have one Pilot In Command.

Even the inconsistent FAA tries very hard to be consistent on this issue, as it's the basis for a lot of other regulations.

Which again, to Acrofox is not to be offensive in any way, but that is just plain stupid as I am assuming you are both trying to log time and get as much PIC as you can.

There are people who fly as safety pilots to help instrument rated pilots stay instrument current, you know. ;>

I'm not even remotely offended. I'm more annoyed that I have to go over this yet again to explain the way the FARs are currently written in that regard. It's easy to do research on something before contradicting someone by saying 'FALSE.'

-Fox
 
I am so bloody sick of this stupid argument.

From faa.gov but unofficial source, unofficial writing (but BIG FRIENDLY LETTERS):
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...ogram/media/LOGGING PILOT-IN-COMMAND TIME.pdf

Little, more legalese letters, official source, official writing:
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...louis glenn - (2009) legal interpretation.pdf

Not freakin' false. Stop spreading misinformation, people.

-Fox, ears flat

I'm not going to keep this fight going, but I would never log SIC unless I was right seat and truly acting on an a/c that needed me. I can't help but think that anyone hiring would laugh if they saw SIC in a 172 or archer.

I don't agree with what the Feds said in those articles, but the Feds have more say than me.
 
But if TSHTF, I'm going to be the final authority as to where we go or what we do unless otherwise agreed upon. You can have more than one pilot "logging" PIC time, but you can only have one Pilot In Command.

Noted. Fox will throw the hood in my face and beat me off the controls if something goes awry :D
 
Every time I see this question pop up, I just shake my head. Ask your next examiner how you should log it. That's who it's most important to.
 
I can understand why someone would agree to fly as safety pilot yet not want to take responsibility for the flight. Some people fully understand the ramifications of being the Pilot In Command, and can weigh that responsibility against the need for a couple more hours of PIC time in the logbook.

If I see 172 SIC time in a logbook during an interview I will probably ask a couple of questions, and if the answers jived I might just be impressed with that candidate's understanding of the regulations and the responsibilities involved. YMMV.
 
There's no definition of Total Time in the FARs, so you can log whatever you like. Many people use it to summarize Total Pilot Time, but some people use it to record other data. Do whatever you like, just know what that number means to you.
 
Now I'm going to rant about the XC logging. As you can see above, this FAA interpretation will not allow the safety pilot to log XC in either of these scenarios yet they have said you can either be PIC or SIC, whichever responsibility you decide to take. You obviously should have been at your crew station watching for traffic and ready to act, especially if you were acting as PIC, but you still can't log the time! You basically did the XC too, granted maybe it was a 6 hour XC and you only acted as PIC safety pilot for the 2.3 hours in the middle and really didn't participate in the XC.

Actually, you didn't, because you didn't do the takeoff and landing. And to meet the requirements for XC for the purpose of a rating, at a minimum, you have to be required crew for at least the takeoff and landing and fly 50 miles away.
 
Actually, you didn't, because you didn't do the takeoff and landing. And to meet the requirements for XC for the purpose of a rating, at a minimum, you have to be required crew for at least the takeoff and landing and fly 50 miles away.

I believe the purpose of XC is to get you away from the places you are familiar with and allow you to actually navigate via pilotage, dead reckoning, navigation aids, etc.. with charts, frequencies, the magic magenta line, or whatever you haven't used before. I guess I was thinking more of the ATP logging of XC when I was ranting.

I did a quick skim through 61.1 again, key words being quick and skim so I may have missed some details, but I didn't see where it states a takeoff is required under any of the XC definitions, just reference to the departure point. Nor could I find in 61.1 that the entirety of the flight had to be by one pilot as sole manipulator to count as XC. So in my eyes, as it's written, I would say for the purpose of ATP requirements you wouldn't have to do a takeoff or a landing and still be able to log XC as long as you go over 50NM and used the required techniques and/or equipment. I think that should be the case whether two pilots take turns as sole manipulator, as long as they each go over 50NM as sole manipulator, or when acting as safety pilot. Except the FAA interpretation as stated above puts the nix on this. It would be easy for them to rewrite the rule stating the pilot must be the sole manipulator for the entirety of the flight, but right now the text does not support the FAA interpretation and that frustrates me.

While a few added words to 61.1 would clear things up instead of having to dig through interpretations, that doesn't change my opinion that by the time you are working towards ATP mins. you are in a different situation. You just need practice in the national airspace system as a whole to gain experience, not necessarily whether you're even going to find the airport, which I think is the main fear amongst beginners. I'm just saying when you act as safety pilot you are most likely using all of the things the person in the other seat is using to log his/her XC, just because he/she was on the controls for the entirety of the flight, that shouldn't be the deciding factor. You were a required crew member for a portion of the XC flight if you went 50NM during the time you were required, I think you should be able to log the time you were a required crew member as XC, but you can't according to the interpretation letters even though there is nothing I can find in the actual rules that states you can't.

This is not to say I think you shouldn't have to do a landing for the Private, Instrument, and Commercial requirements as I think you need that experience in somewhere around your first 250 hours. Basically I'm saying I think for everything but the ATP requirements should state one pilot must be sole manipulator for the entirety of the flight and for ATP requirements they shouldn't and should say you need to travel at least 50NM using the required techniques and/or equipment but not necessarily from the departure point or for the entirety of the flight.

Thank you for pointing out the need for clarification on my opinion.
 
Back
Top