Boeing Reveals Hypersonic Concept That Could Replace SR-71

A Life Aloft

Well-Known Member

This week Boeing revealed the first design details of a demonstrator aircraft that would go faster than Mach 5. Boeing hopes to build the hypersonic concept around a combined-cycle engine that incorporates elements of a turbine and a dual ramjet/scramjet. The unveiling came at the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics SciTech forum in Orlando, Florida, as reported by Aviation Week Aerospace Daily.

Boeing's model design is similar to one Lockheed Martin is working on. The aerospace industry right now is racing to produce a hypersonic strike and reconnaissance aircraft to replace the famed SR-71 Blackbird.

1519358814868.png



The design is an early concept that's not yet approved by Boeing for full-scale development. But the model, which shows a twin-tail, highly swept delta wing configuration, represents a feasible hypersonic design, Boeing's head of hypersonic research told Aviation Week Aerospace Daily:

“We asked, ‘What is the most affordable way to do a reusable hypersonic demonstrator vehicle?’ And we did our own independent research looking at this question,” says Kevin Bowcutt, Boeing chief scientist for hypersonics. If the concept is selected for full-scale development, Boeing envisions a two-step process beginning with flight tests of an F-16-sized, single-engine proof-of-concept precursor vehicle leading to a twin-engine, full-scale operational vehicle with about the same dimensions as the 107-ft.-long SR-71.​
Boeing will expand on research from its past X-43 and X-51 Waverider experimental aircraft, which were tests of unmanned hypersonic planes, as the company refines a new aircraft design. The X-51 broke the record for sustained air-breathing hypersonic flight when it flew at Mach 5.1 for three and a half minutes before running out of fuel and crashing into the Pacific Ocean on May 1, 2013.

The big difference is that the X-51 was a small test vehicle dropped from a B-52 Stratofortress. It used a rocket booster to achieve Mach 4.8, then jettisoned the booster and used a scramjet to top Mach 5. A hypersonic replacement for the SR-71 would need to take off under its own power, accelerate through Mach 1 and up to above Mach 5, and then slow back down and land, a much more difficult challenge.

To tackle this problem, Boeing and Lockheed Martin are studying turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) engines along with Orbital ATK and Aerojet Rocketdyne, respectively. A TBCC engine would use a conventional turbojet to achieve speeds up to about Mach 3, the limit for a turbojet, and then transition to a dual ramjet/scramjet, which must be traveling at speeds over Mach 3 to work properly, compressing air from the intake to achieve combustion without an axial compressor. The ramjet/scramjet would then carry an aircraft to speeds over Mach 5. The plane would need to transition back to to the turbojet to slow down and land.

1519359155046.png


Boeing's project for a "son-of-Blackbird" hypersonic strike and reconnaissance aircraft is in its very early days. Meanwhile, a demonstrator for Lockheed Martin's design was possibly spotted in Palmdale, California, near the Air Force plant where Lockheed's Skunk Works operates. Work on a TBCC engine, funded under DARPA's Advanced Full Range Engine (AFRE) program as well as by NASA and the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, is also still in the early stages.

It is difficult to put a timeline on the research or the potential flight tests, though Lockheed reportedly hopes to fly a single-engine scaled demonstrator known as the flight research vehicle (FRV) in the 2020s. One has to imagine Boeing wants to match Lockheed Martin's development schedule, if not surpass it.



1519358985872.png
 
Start with ditching the yoke, Boeing. Baby steps.

It will be unmanned. :stir::stir:

I wouldn’t blame them.

Hypersonic is going to put so much more requirement on the airframe design that weighing this pros/cons against things like giving the pilot a good sight picture through glass to execute landings or refuel is kinda wasted effort.

We have the technology. Plus this could finally be the thing that bridges ideas like putting small modular sensor package aircraft and pumping that data to a ground site where it can be more widely and efficiently exploited. Basically do what we did with LAMPS helicopters for sub huntjng back in the 70s but with our EC/MC/RC family of aircraft so we don’t need to buy airliner sized planes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
When they show something like this to the public is because they have been testing it for a while.......
 
Think about hypersonic parabolic arc travel. NYC to SYD in 20 minutes. LAX to LHR in 15 minutes. The old way of getting paid, by block hour, is gonna halfta change radically.

Sounds cool but $$$$$

There is a reason we fly at .76-.78 most times.
 
Think about hypersonic parabolic arc travel. NYC to SYD in 20 minutes. LAX to LHR in 15 minutes. The old way of getting paid, by block hour, is gonna halfta change radically.

Sounds cool but $$$$$

There is a reason we fly at .76-.78 most times.

To go with that, I’d like to see a study on what increasing transit speeds would do to the management load required on ATC and airport facilities.

Some airports can’t seem to handle the s-storm now. I can’t imagine drastically increasing the rate at which new aircraft arrive while you can still only clean/load passengers at current speeds is going to help things much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top