BCTAv8r said:It won't matter if Boeing and Bombardier join. Embraer will still sell planes.:rawk:
BCTAv8r said:It won't matter if Boeing and Bombardier join. Embraer will still sell planes.:rawk:
Ok, it was rather inmature. I just think Embraer builds better airplanes though. And this is not because I'm Brazilian, but because they are selling lots of airplanes.Maximillian_Jenius said:A.NET post...Brian,Brian your better then that much better!
![]()
BCTAv8r said:Ok, it was rather inmature. I just think Embraer builds better airplanes though. And this is not because I'm Brazilian, but because they are selling lots of airplanes.
BCTAv8r said:Ok, it was rather inmature. I just think Embraer builds better airplanes though. And this is not because I'm Brazilian, but because they are selling lots of airplanes.
stuckingfk said:Last time I checked, so is Boeing.
cime_sp said:Jerry Atkin (the SkyWest/ASA CEO) was in our pilot lounge the other day speaking about the CRJ 700 vs the E 170. According to him, the CRJ has operating economics (including purchase price, maintenance, fuel, etc...) that are 5-6% better than that of the Embraer. Thats not chump change when you factor that over a whole fleet for an entire year! Now he also said that flip/flops when you start to get into the 90 seat range with the CRJ 900 and E190. What does that all mean.....who knows, just figured I'd throw that out there.
BCTAv8r said:So you're saying Embraer is venturing into the larger jet categories? Does Boeing feel threatned in any way?
Timbuff10 said:If the new high capicity jets (E170/190, and CRJ7/900) made by the brazilians and the canadians were not in production you can bet Boeing would have sold a lot more 737-600s and Airbus would have sold many more 318s too.
The only reason to buy those at the moment is for commonality.
Timbuff10 said:Yeah but nearly isn't the same, and when you can save a buck in this business, you jump on it.