Noone here said that the pilots were not at fault, the replies all agree with that too. Moving past that aspect, once you have a liable defendant, you have to figure out the plaintiff award. What I'm saying is that people should have a little more sympathy for victims instead saying that they got too much money.
Maybe the defendant lawyer was rude, and it rubbed the jurors the wrong way, maybe the plaintiff lawyer was good and presented a strong case, noone knows. Any one of these things can make a losing case into a winner, or vice versa and change the award. Cases can be won or lost on technicalities. What bothers me, is the extremely accusatory tone of some of the earlier posts, saying that the vicitims were gladly "profiting" from the death. It's kind of insenstive, don't you think? Noone has the right to say that this man's life wasn't worth xxx dollars, and that their survivors are greedy, but that's what some posts here are suggesting.
As for who was liable, based off that article, I don't have a differing opinion on that...the justice system isn't perfect. People sue over little stuff, and on the other end, little people are regularly trampled by big money.