The normal rate comes out to $95 dry an hour (hobbs) with taxes and all that. I'm not sure what the block time is, since it's not listed on their site for some reason.It shouldn't be any different than paying by the hobbs meter. Block time is from engine start to engine stop (like any normal bugsmashing flight school airplane). If you need to build hours and/or are going to use the time for sure, take every discount you can get.
What is your normal hourly rate and what are they offering for 10 hour blocks?
2001 172S and 172R. I agree that it's expensive but they're always hangared and plugged in in the winter. Maintenance is kept up with very well too. I'm tired of using up all my money though and only getting a few hours to show for it. All of the "cheap" planes on the field look pretty rough. I've heard almost nothing but bad things about some of them.What are you flying for $95/dry. That is very expensive.
2001 172S and 172R. I agree that it's expensive but they're always hangared and plugged in in the winter. Maintenance is kept up with very well too. I'm tired of using up all my money though and only getting a few hours to show for it. All of the "cheap" planes on the field look pretty rough. I've heard almost nothing but bad things about some of them.
While that's definitely true, you still have to be weary sometimes. There was an older cheap plane that I got checked out in. A few weeks later it was gone from the flight school after the school found out the owner (lease back) was trying to do the MX himself.... without having an A&P.But they still fly.
I'd go with the cheap planes.
I'm a student with sign offs in a 172 SP (G1000) 172 M DA40 and a few others.
Guess wha im taking my checkride in?
the 172M.
They're cheap and dont look good, but they still fly, and 172 time is 172 time.
Check 43 app. A. An owner can open panels even without an A&P.Is it true that sometimes the owner can do parts of the maintenance in advance of an A & P coming back to check the work performed?
Opening inspection plates, etc,...
You definitely want to be comfortable with the planes you fly, but just because it is old and rough-looking doesn't mean it is not airworthy. Consider shopping around, maybe visit a different airport in the area.
I know the pilot/owner can do maintenance to some extent, but obviously there was a safety issue if the owners of the flight school decided they didn't want to operate the plane anymore.
It's not an assumption, it's what everyone was told. I don't have any problems flying older, well maintained airplanes, but obviously there's gonna be some FBO's/rental outfits that have shoddy planes, either by their own doing or not (I know of some in the area that would have repeated problems no matter how many times they were "fixed").That is a big assumption to make. It could have been a lease-back that had expired, financing on a newer airplane that was very attractive, hell...could be 1000 reasons. To "assume" it safety issues is just that...an assumption.
One last thing...jot down the N-numbers of the "junkers" and search the NTSB website for incidents. Even better...search for the school name only and see what comes up. You may be surprised.
By which ones have or haven't been involved in accidents? There's a few in the area that I've stumbled upon in the NTSB database.You may be surprised.