Once money is in the IRA, you still don't pay capital gains or dividends taxes. For a young guy like me, that adds up over time.
Also, you can convert the IRA into a ROTH IRA, with no income limit test in the future. There are some tax implications on this, so it takes some research first.
Non-rev to someplace that isn't the USA and get dental work done there. Seriously.
So I have a traditional IRA in place from rolled-over 401k plans. All that was originally pre-tax money. The only mechanism to make contributions would be with taxed funds. That seems a bit messy.
I may be the only one to think this way but a condo you live in is not an asset... it does not produce any cash flow. It is an expense because it sucks up your money. Regardless, congrats on the purchase.Well, I get a pay raise in 7 months! Woo hoo!
I did my best to keep the payment as low as possible: my down payment on my condo was $38,000. It was my savings. All of it. So I'm currently borrowing $124,000 at 4.5% that has been paid down for about a year so far. 1156 sq ft condo, $155,000 sale price.
It's an asset, that's why I purchased rather than continue to rent.
I'm not worried about my credit score... Never been a problem. Never been turned down for loans when I've needed them and always a good rate.ATN_Pilot said:You realize that after a bill goes 30 days late, they have the right to put a negative report on your credit, right? I would not recommend this strategy.
You don't understand the definition of asset.I may be the only one to think this way but a condo you live in is not an asset... it does not produce any cash flow. It is an expense because it sucks up your money. Regardless, congrats on the purchase.
I do actually... But I don't consider something that draws money away from my income column to be considered an asset... its an expenditure or liability.You don't understand the definition of asset.
I do actually... But I don't consider something that draws money away from my income column to be considered an asset... its an expenditure or liability.
My work 401(k) is both Roth IRA and post-tax IRA. What is the advantage of doing a separate transaction to a different 401k that is not employer funded/directed? Is it only to access different funds?
Do people's employers not have Roth 401(k)s? I've had that at both airlines, so I split my contribution to pre- and post-tax deductions.
Words mean things, no matter what you "consider" them.
The mortgage note is the liability. The payment you make towards the note is the expenditure. And the condo is the asset.
It's an asset just not a great asset. You're still building equity but you have limitations from condo fees and a limited amount of improvements you can do to the property.I do actually... But I don't consider something that draws money away from my income column to be considered an asset... its an expenditure or liability.
It's an asset just not a great asset. You're still building equity but you have limitations from condo fees and a limited amount of improvements you can do to the property.
What do you view as an asset?Perhaps but A) he doesn't own it outright which (to me) means it isn't an asset (yet). B) COA/HOA in general and their associated fees (to me) unless properly managed are BS (another story for another time). C) limited amount of improvements indeed if any at all! Further stifling any type of ability to turn a liability into an asset.
Sure my way of viewing this is flawed but its served me well during the last 9 years. I don't see cars, houses, boats, or planes as assets but as liabilities.
A property/vehicle/entity that generates positive cash flow.What do you view as an asset?
It's OK... I already said I was demented and I am.There's just so much wrong that I don't where to start!
You're ugly. That's what's wrong.Avalon781ML said:It's OK... I already said I was demented and I am. Better yet... Tell me what's wrong so I have a chance of correcting my ways!
I am ugly... but at least I don't hang out in Panamanian pools...You're ugly. That's what's wrong.