So, it's like you are studying this and getting it right by proxy. But then, what? Asking questions to validate if pilots actually know what you seem already to understand?Anyway so, if the lift develops due to longer distance on the upper camber of the wing
- planes wouldn't fly upside down
- symmetrical wings couldn't fly
- wings with a longer lower camber wouldn't fly
Yet they do all fly, so that explanation doesn't work.
I also add my reasoning that (since I based my explanation on speed) it would also mean that higher speed directly translates to lift in all standard cases. That was just me having a bit of fun at my own mis-take.
I found the list to be apt and brilliant and I plan to read about the other explanations when I'm less sleep deprived.
I read every word that was written here gratefully and I am thankful for the time and expertise which was offered here to me and others who found something valuable here. Thank you all once again for the knowledge, ideas and information resources.
I think it's fair to say that it's probably time for me to take another break away from jc. This place stresses me out. I'm never sure what I can ask or if I should answer and i somehow get it wrong no matter what i choose.
Peaceuntil next time
I mean, good on ya. But still... You don't have a job yet. And I'm reasonably certain your approach is not going to work well toward that goal. ...if in fact, that is your goal.