Baron Checkout

Alchemy

Well-Known Member
I got checked out in the Baron today! My flight school operates a 1962 B55....I was expecting it to be a difficult airplane to fly, but much to my surprise, it handles like a dream.

The Baron is much easier to handle than the only other twin I've flown, the piper PA34-200 Seneca. Landings in the Baron feel like the runway is coated in vaseline, taxiing feels more precise, you have better visibility because you ride higher.

The pilot who was checking me out told me I'd never want to go back to the seneca after flying the baron....he was right. We flew to an uncontrolled airport 20 NM away to do some touch and goes...seems like it only took us 6-7 minutes to get there. Everything went well in the pattern, except it took me a few tries to figure out the flap control (no detents, you hold the flap control down continuosly to extend the flaps, and you have to look outside for the black indicator lines on the flaps themselves to put them at the appropriate value).

It was also tricky to have the flap control on the left side of the throttle quadrant and the gear on the right side (opposite most configurations). Because of this, I accidentally forgot to raise the flaps during one touch and gos. This caused some momentary confusion as the airplane lifted off much closer to VMC than I would've liked. My checkpilot didn't catch this either (or at least didn't say anything), but I figured it out once we got to 50 AGL and raised the flaps. The Baron is also equipped with electric cowl flaps....another item which takes some getting used to. Hard to break the habit of feeling around the floor for the cowl flap handles. Before today, I was not used to doing touch and goes in a twin, but since we had a long runway, the airport wasn't very conducive to taxi-arounds, and the checkpilot ok'd it, we opted to go for it today.

Speaking of control configuration differences, the throttle and prop levers are reversed in this airplane. By that I mean the prop controls are the first two levers on the left side of the throttle quadrant and the throttles are in the middle. This is really not hard to get used to, since the shapes of the handles lets you know right away what your hand is on.

After the touch and goes, we maneuvered away from the airport and pulled the throttle to idle on the left (critical) engine. As soon as I put in full power on the right engine, the airplane began climbing at 300-400 fpm. This was a pleasant surprise coming from the underpowered piper twin.

On the way back in, we clocked a 200 knot groundspeed at 1500 AGL....my personal fastest. On the landing we had an 80 degree crosswind at 9 knots, but the baron was still a sinch to grease.

Overall I love this plane, and wish I would've started flying it sooner. It is much more forgiving than I expected it to be (see taking off with full flaps) considering the performance it offers.
 
Are they as loud on the inside as they are standing next to one? Also, are they as heavy in slow flight as the Seneca? They sure are a sweet looking and sounding airplane.
 
Yes, it's pretty loud on the inside, but not excessively so. Initially, I kept trying to mess with my squelch to keep the noise down. I thought my mic was picking up the engine, but I eventually realized that the squelch was fine and it's just a noisy airplane.

The newer Barons are probably a lot quieter. I guess hearing loss wasn't as much of a concern back in 1962 when this particular baron rolled off the assembly line.

I didn't put the airplane into slow flight or stall today (only put .8 on the hobbs), but it did not have that annoying tendency to drop a wing that the seneca has during the flare. Both the seneca and the cherokee have the hershey bar wing, and I've found that they both get real sloppy when you get close to stall. On final I kept the airspeed at blueline (120mph) until landing assured, at which point I slowed to about 110 and touched down at about 95-100 (I'm guessing on that last number, since I don't look at the airspeed indicator all that much during the flare.) I had no problems flying at those airspeeds, and the baron did not display any wing dropping tendencies. This made it especially easy to handle the crosswind.
 
I flew a BE-95 and then a BE-55 while in college on the side because my friend's father owned both.

Beech builds the finest aircraft on earth. If they built transport category jets, they'd have put Boeing out of business 20 years ago.
 
Can't wait to fly those at MAPD. My first CFI's dad has a Baron. Maybe after I move back home I can sneak some time in it. He's only about an hour away.
 
Barons are perhaps the finest piston twin built on earth. King Airs (1900's down to C-90s) are absolutely the finest turbine-twins on earth.

Beech builds a fantastic aircraft. I don't know squat about the Beech/DiamondJet at all.
 
If you think that antique 55 is fun, get in a late model 58 Baron ... you'll think you've died and gone to Airplane Heaven. I loved every minute I flew in the 58 Barons ... fabulous airplanes.

Doug is right on ... Beech makes some terrific airplanes. I'll miss flying the King Air ... but Embraer here I come.
 
Yeah, Barons are sweet!

Beechcraft are the Mercedes-Benz of GA.

I got to fly a Baron E-55 (just like a B-55 but with IO-520 engines) last weekend. I flew from Hilton Head to Nashville and back on Saturday and repeated the trip on Sunday.

We had dual Garmin 430's and an in dash cd player and FM stereo. Saturday afternoon, 9,500ft, Nashville to Hilton Head. Auto pilot on, 1000ft above a scattered layer, seat reclined, listening to music, TAS of 200kt, and a ground speed of 222 kts. Fat, Dumb, and Happy!
 
[ QUOTE ]
no detents, you hold the flap control down continuosly to extend the flaps, and you have to look outside for the black indicator lines on the flaps themselves to put them at the appropriate value

[/ QUOTE ]

The Apache is the same way (we do have an indicator on the panel but it's, well ... "quirky") in terms of no indents (it also has the gear on the right and the flap on the left but that's the way it is in transport aircraft I believe). Anyway, I don't know about the Baron, but in the Apache we get a nice little pitch change at 1/2 flaps so I just hold it in until I feel the airplane pitch and it works out to 1/2 flaps everytime.

Little tihngs/tricks like that will come to you too as you get more time in type.
 
Like Doug, I also have flown (fly) the BE-95 (Travel Air = the "Baron-Light"
grin.gif
). I LOVE it!! But, I have to be honest when I say that I have no other twin-engine to compare it to (yet).
 
The Travel Air rocks. 180 HP but it'll kick the crap out of a Duchess or a Seminole...
 
Definitely "Baron Lite", but the Seminole is a "Twin Archer" and the Duchess is a "Super Skipper!"
 
[ QUOTE ]
The Travel Air rocks. 180 HP but it'll kick the crap out of a Duchess or a Seminole...

[/ QUOTE ]

And my only choices for twin training in the TC seem to be a Duchess or Seminole!!
frown.gif


MF
 
[ QUOTE ]
And my only choices for twin training in the TC seem to be a Duchess or Seminole!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Eh, don't worry about it MF - I'll be flyin' the "Twin Archer" myself when it comes time.
grin.gif


Sarah
 
Aw now, Sarah - don't call the man a MF. He was just saying that he'd like to fly the "Baron Light" like us real men.
grin.gif


<ducks for cover>
 
Holy crap, I re-read the post after R2F's response and now that's hilarious!

But you've got to say it in a "Wanda Sykes"-style voice.
 
R2F, you got me, I'll admit.
crazy.gif
very cute.

Anyways, MINNESOTA FLYER, as I was saying...
grin.gif
 
Back
Top