There are. My personal favorite is the guy who was defending himself on an assault charge and asked the witness, "How can you identify me? Your back was turned when I hit you!"To be fair there are plenty of stupid questions. I have been bugging someone who answered this with a ton of them.
But not completely unheard of....
But to be just as fair it's rare to see one here.
True. But I think I can say with some confidence that I have heard way more stupid answers than stupid questions.But not completely unheard of.![]()
True. But I think I can say with some confidence that I have heard way more stupid answers than stupid questions.![]()
Please do. As one or two others have said, post them up. They may feel stupid to you but they are probably questions we have all had at one point or another and it's always a good exercise to see them and go over them again. It's for our benefit as much as yours.Well, someone was nice enough to help me out with some questions on derived mins. I'm sure I'll have more stupid questions and I will ask them as they come up!
Thank you all.
KCVG 061752Z 36017G25KT 4SM BR BKN009 OVC011 04/02 A3027 RMK AO2 SLP249 60023T00390017 10061 20039 51025
As I was going through this METAR I realized I'm not entirely certain what these strings of numbers represent.
There are. My personal favorite is the guy who was defending himself on an assault charge and asked the witness, "How can you identify me? Your back was turned when I hit you!"
But to be just as fair it's rare to see one here.
Those are temperature and dew point specifics. This helps: http://www.met.tamu.edu/class/metar/quick-metar.html
Fun stuff to know, especially at cocktail parties with FAA officials or ground school instructors. Even better stuff to be able to reference quickly. But if that is what @Dispatch_Ken's potential employer is focusing on, I'd suggest he try to find a different potential employer. Unless Ken is applying for a Wx Forecasting position (e.g. entering those numbers into a mainframe with the intent of modelling Wx) or an avionics position (e.g. digging into the innards of and trying to fine tune a baro system), those are rather irrelevant numbers.
Kinda sorta seems more useful to focus on stuff like "What preflight paperwork do you need to fly to Calgary or Puerto Vallarta?, "When can you descend below minimums on a circling approach?, etc. Maybe the Wx question is a tie breaker, but still seems like a better overtime question could be devised.
Ah well maybe that's the difference between a Dispatch and a Pilot interview. I've generally found that you should be able to describe in detail each and everything found in a METAR. It may not be the most important thing in the world, but I will take any advantage I can get.
Oh crap. I guess I just put myself in the "stupid people" box. I thought it was flying gig.![]()