Shiftace
s***posting with decency. trolling with integrity.
Here is the scenario on an Instrument Check Flight.
Student is asked to fly an RNAV approach and execute the missed approach and fly the published hold. The fix that defines the hold is IAF for the RNAV approach on the opposing runway. So - student is to fly RNAV 18 approach, go missed and hold.
As they approach and cross the fix, still outbound for the hold - the evaluator playing the role of ATC - clears the student for RNAV 36 approach. Student turns and heads straight to the fix. Is this correct? Or do you have to fly the full outbound and wait for the inbound turn?
Student is asked to fly an RNAV approach and execute the missed approach and fly the published hold. The fix that defines the hold is IAF for the RNAV approach on the opposing runway. So - student is to fly RNAV 18 approach, go missed and hold.
As they approach and cross the fix, still outbound for the hold - the evaluator playing the role of ATC - clears the student for RNAV 36 approach. Student turns and heads straight to the fix. Is this correct? Or do you have to fly the full outbound and wait for the inbound turn?