[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think that If I go into a CFII checkride with only the advice to read the plate from the 'top to the bottom', the DPE won't be all that impressed.
[/ QUOTE ]What makes you think that? Won't be impressed with teaching to do it right?
Wait. I take that back. It takes all kinds. I sent a student for a private pilot checkride. The student reviewed the aircraft logs, discovered what no one else had - that the last annual hadn't been endorsed properly, arranged for another airplane, sat down for the oral, explained what he found wrong with the old airplane, and discussed airworthiness requirements in detail. He passed, but the DE later asked me "How come he hasn't memorized TOMATO FLAMES?"
So have a list of all the mnemonics you can find ready if catch phrases are more important to your DE than knowledge.
Here's another totally useless one for your collection:
PAIN CALL:
P - Position. Where are you in relation to the IAF?
This will help you anticipate what ATC will be asking
you to do.
A - ATIS (or AWOS): This should give you a clue what
approach you'll be getting, or which one you want to
ask for.
I - Instruments. Altimeter to the setting you just got
off the ATIS, DG to the compass.
N - Nav radios. Sub-checklist: TITS. Tune, Identify,
Twist (OBS), Set markers (for an ILS).
C - Comm radios. If you've got flip-flops you should
be able to set frequencies to get you all the way to
the FBO. If not, at least have tower on the 2nd radio
before you hit the IAF.
A - Approach. Brief the rest of the approach. What
are the minimums? What's the missed? What other
altitudes will you be flying? etc. etc.
L - Landing checklist. GUMPS, or whatever you like.
L - Listen. (for instructions from ATC.)
Don't ask where I found this piece of crap. There was some contest for the worst aviation mnemonic and this won hands down. The pilot who made it up eventually forgot to aviate and navigate while trying to remember what the heck it meant an flew into a mountain.
<<Sigh>>
[/ QUOTE ]
Midlife,
Amen, brother. Good response. I've seen too many studs that are so swamped with acronyms, they forget which ones go where, and even what they mean. Like you infer, the NACO/Jepp charts came out with the format they did specifically to make briefing them easier...and in an organized format. Why make stuff harder than it has to be, people?
KISS principle. Learn it, live it.
As an IP, I'm not interested in a studs style points, I'm interested in the substance.....what he knows, if he's procedurally correct, and exercises good judgement.