Another one bites the dust...DC3

melax

Well-Known Member
An another DC3 is down in Canada, (Basler turbo prop mod), first flight for that frame seems to be 1943 ! I'm not a DC3 expert but why would you still fly these things for more than 70 years, 76 to be exact, how safe and economical is it ?
Not long ago one (radial) crashed in Colombia. Luckily in this later occurrence evryone got out OK

 
I met the owner of Basler recently - super nice guy. Simply put, nothing can do what it can do for the same money. The Basler ones are basically new airplanes but stupidly simple to maintain and well supported. Nothing outside of a military transport will haul as much into and out of non-paved strips.
 
Canadian TSB will just classify this as a “hard landing.”

Like this one:
0C6430F6-82AE-458F-B983-B43DE522110B.jpeg
 
Did the US Forest Service get rid of all of theirs that were jump planes?
 
The oldest plane I’ve been flying lately was built in 1946, and I don’t think twice about getting into it.

Things like sewing machines, vacuum cleaners and airplanes will run forever with proper maintenance.
 
An another DC3 is down in Canada, (Basler turbo prop mod), first flight for that frame seems to be 1943 ! I'm not a DC3 expert but why would you still fly these things for more than 70 years, 76 to be exact, how safe and economical is it ?
Not long ago one (radial) crashed in Colombia. Luckily in this later occurrence evryone got out OK


Go to Basler's web page and see how extensive their conversion is.
I doubt there is anything out there that can accomplish the same missions.

The BT67 (DC3) operations are usually in a high risk environments and sometimes off airport environments.

Safe? as safe as possible with the available resources.
 
An another DC3 is down in Canada, (Basler turbo prop mod), first flight for that frame seems to be 1943 ! I'm not a DC3 expert but why would you still fly these things for more than 70 years, 76 to be exact, how safe and economical is it ?
Not long ago one (radial) crashed in Colombia. Luckily in this later occurrence evryone got out OK

Because they dont make heavy lift aircraft that dont need 8k plus runways anymore.
 
[NeQUOTE="melax, post: 2934853, member: 7322"]
An another DC3 is down in Canada, (Basler turbo prop mod), first flight for that frame seems to be 1943 ! I'm not a DC3 expert but why would you still fly these things for more than 70 years, 76 to be exact, how safe and economical is it ?
Not long ago one (radial) crashed in Colombia. Luckily in this later occurrence evryone got out OK

[/QUOTE]Crashing isn't exclusive to older aircraft, newer planes crash too.
My understanding is that the BT-67 is bad-ass and a very economical option.
 
Back
Top