Another DC-3 incident

SUPER DC-3

It's a strong plane.
My guess is that it'll be flying again early Jan

#2 looks like it wasn't fully feathered.
 
SUPER DC-3

It's a strong plane.
My guess is that it'll be flying again early Jan

#2 looks like it wasn't fully feathered.
Looks like it was back in the air same day.

Can I log that time?

F3AF5D9A-9956-47A5-971A-26B70B4349FF.jpeg
 
I was surprised to learn they were still making DC-3s until 1952, but that's not correct. The airframe was built in 1943 (42-24345) and was rebuilt in 1952 as an R4D-8/C-117D Super DC-3 (39080)
 
I was surprised to learn they were still making DC-3s until 1952, but that's not correct. The airframe was built in 1943 (42-24345) and was rebuilt in 1952 as an R4D-8/C-117D Super DC-3 (39080)

I can still vaguely remember seeing the air station C-117D assigned to MCAS Yuma in the very late 1970s during an airshow there when it was still in USMC service and on display.
 
Honestly, I'm not sure why we even bother asking a question like that when a crew has a successful outcome from a serious emergency.

On first take, that appears to have been some solid airmanship to me.

-Fox

Any questions are good to ask for informational purposes when it comes to understanding what the crew was specifically facing at a given moment and what drove certain actions they took or didn’t take. Could be some good lessons for another pilot or crew in a similar situation someday.
 
Any questions are good to ask for informational purposes when it comes to understanding what the crew was specifically facing at a given moment and what drove certain actions they took or didn’t take. Could be some good lessons for another pilot or crew in a similar situation someday.
Something about the hyd pump working on one engine maybe, or reducing the unwanted drag. Either way a good outcome
 
Back
Top