I didn't mean that it had to be voted in by the members, but why would the MEC allow it to go to vote if it didn't meet their demands? Why waste everyones time?
Oooooh, that's a pretty common thing.
My assumption would be to show the MEC actually will give up something for a TA. Image helps with bargaining I would think. If the pilot group votes the TA down, then they would have more to work with.
I didn't mean that it had to be voted in by the members, but why would the MEC allow it to go to vote if it didn't meet their demands? Why waste everyones time?
The others have already kinda explained this, but the MEC is going to - largely - always vote to send the TA to the pilot group. So long as certain criteria are met, the MEC has done the job they've been told to do - or so they believe.
Now it's up to the pilot group to determine if this TA is something they want to work under, regardless if it made it beyond an MEC vote. The vote from the MEC wasn't a "We approved of everything in this TA, so you should too. . ." it's a "We have a TA, we think we should let you look at it now, and tell us whether you like it or not. . .if not . . .we're back to work for you"
The others have already kinda explained this, but the MEC is going to - largely - always vote to send the TA to the pilot group. So long as certain criteria are met, the MEC has done the job they've been told to do - or so they believe.
Now it's up to the pilot group to determine if this TA is something they want to work under, regardless if it made it beyond an MEC vote. The vote from the MEC wasn't a "We approved of everything in this TA, so you should too. . ." it's a "We have a TA, we think we should let you look at it now, and tell us whether you like it or not. . .if not . . .we're back to work for you"
It's really more of a DFR (Duty of Fair Representation) issue. On some properties, the elected leadership (MEC's @ ALPA), have the right to accept a contract without membership ratification. At the IBT as far as I know, the Executive Council does not have that right. If the T/A meets the guidelines of what was being sought, it must go to the membership for a vote.
My understanding this morning is that there was some misinformation out there about what was in the T/A. Everything that was previously agreed to is contained. One bone of contention mentioned was the per diem. Rumor was only $1.25 and hour and in fact they had already agreed to $2.00. I'm sure there's more, but their local leadership and the Airline Director are there and holding meetings to review everything and answer questions.
Really?
Todd in 3...2...1...
That's correct. Unless it is specifically written into a property's Admin Manual or some other document, there is no requirement for the membership to ratify a contract. The contract I currently operate under was voted DOWN by the membership 70%-30% and yet the MEC went ahead and signed it in anyways. The sad thing is is took another three years to actually recall them.
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot...?That's correct. Unless it is specifically written into a property's Admin Manual or some other document, there is no requirement for the membership to ratify a contract. The contract I currently operate under was voted DOWN by the membership 70%-30% and yet the MEC went ahead and signed it in anyways. The sad thing is is took another three years to actually recall them.
It's really more of a DFR (Duty of Fair Representation) issue. On some properties, the elected leadership (MEC's @ ALPA), have the right to accept a contract without membership ratification. At the IBT as far as I know, the Executive Council does not have that right. If the T/A meets the guidelines of what was being sought, it must go to the membership for a vote.
Really?
Todd in 3...2...1...
The strike is over!
We beat them after five years!
Thanks to all of our supporters! ABX, Atlas, AA, USAir, FedEx, UPS, Capital, and all those that donated to our fund and showed up to the line to walk with us. You were the glue that held our little pieces together when we were wavering under pressure. The pilots at Amerijet will be there to walk the line with you the moment you need us.
I personally want to thank David Bourne and the IBT Airline Division for their support and guidance through this difficult and trying process. Also, thanks go out to our IBT Local 769 and their business agents for standing behind us and fighting Amerijet's tyrannical management team for over five years. You never turned your back or walked away even when times were tough.
Thanks to all the $$$ members! If there is anyone who I forgot, I apologize. You have our thanks also.
Amerijet Strikers, you have my utmost respect. I am proud to have stood alongside you in this fight for a better living as professional pilots.
Remember: This fight is not over.
In Unity!
To the scabs: #### YOU. You stabbed every pilot in the industry right in the back. We will never forget.
To the Scabs-thats the happy, joyful and classy part.
I'm not condoning scabs in any way, shape or form but is it necessary to add that to the letter?
To the Scabs-thats the happy, joyful and classy part.
I'm not condoning scabs in any way, shape or form but is it necessary to add that to the letter?
To the Scabs-thats the happy, joyful and classy part.
I'm not condoning scabs in any way, shape or form but is it necessary to add that to the letter?