z987k
Well-Known Member
You're correct.I thought it was 7500?
You're correct.I thought it was 7500?
Meeee TooooI thought it was 7500?
I thought it was 7500?
AMF has an exemption to fly more than 7500 lbs. They've had it for years. The brasilia already can/does fly more than 7500lbs.
I had to look it up, since I haven't needed to know in a long time, but part 119 does say 6000lbs. Some reason I thought it was 7500.6000 is the normal 135 limit, and the exemption allowed them to go to 7500, is what I remember. I suppose it could be higher, you know for sure it is? But I can't look it up since I don't have my books anymore (thank god).
Regardless, with as much trouble as they had finding places to fly the E120s, who on Earth would they fly CRJs for
6000 is the normal 135 limit, and the exemption allowed them to go to 7500, is what I remember. I suppose it could be higher, you know for sure it is? But I can't look it up since I don't have my books anymore (thank god).
Regardless, with as much trouble as they had finding places to fly the E120s, who on Earth would they fly CRJs for
6000 is the normal 135 limit, and the exemption allowed them to go to 7500, is what I remember. I suppose it could be higher, you know for sure it is? But I can't look it up since I don't have my books anymore (thank god).
Regardless, with as much trouble as they had finding places to fly the E120s, who on Earth would they fly CRJs for
Some light reading material. The answer is buried in this:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2006-02-07/html/06-1087.htm
Ah! Can anyone point me to where 7500lbs is the limit for 135. Part 119.5 mentions 6000lbs, and 119.3 that is mentioned in that exemption doesn't exist anymore.Some light reading material. The answer is buried in this:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2006-02-07/html/06-1087.htm
They can fly the CRJ 135 all they want, limited to 7500lbs payload or 9 pax.Fair enough, but once the cat is out of the bag on a CRJ freighter being operated 121, I don't see the FAA allowing another carrier to operate the same plane 135.
They can fly the CRJ 135 all they want, limited to 7500lbs payload or 9 pax.
6000 is the normal 135 limit, and the exemption allowed them to go to 7500, is what I remember. I suppose it could be higher, you know for sure it is? But I can't look it up since I don't have my books anymore (thank god).
Regardless, with as much trouble as they had finding places to fly the E120s, who on Earth would they fly CRJs for
Where did you go!?
Non-Sked 121, DC9
Kalitta? Nice man enjoy.
Did you read the exemption you posted? It says that it's limited to the emb-120er and it's limited to 633lbs.http://www.aviationtoday.com/mobile/getitem.php?item=4131
The thing that I noticed about the exemption is that it's open ended. It just states that AMF can carry more than 7500lbs. It's not exclusive to the bro and it doesn't specify how much over 7500lbs they can carry. The actual language of the document is pretty open ended.
Did you read the exemption you posted? It says that it's limited to the emb-120er and it's limited to 633lbs.
Just read the one that was handed to us in class. It allows us to go above 7500, on the Brasilia only it seems. We would need to get another exemption if they buy another aircraft type. I don't know where I got that 30000 pound number. Maybe that's the FedEx limit for feeder/supplemental carriers. I don't know.Seriously? 30,000lbs on a 135 cert when it's supposed to be 8,500? If I were a 121 cargo outfit, I'd be screaming bloody murder. It costs more to do things 121 and that is a massive competitive advantage.
Anyone know how many E120s AMF is buying?