Airlines LOVE anything military at the major level. They're more or less pre-screened. Love it or hate it, if you're a zillionaire or a pauper, you've pretty much only got your skillz to get you thru UPT.
With respect to the thread topic, I can only shake my head at the GoJet pilot.
First off, I can't fathom what kind of an ego it takes to stop your phone conversation for the specific purpose of going over to razz a fellow pilot about what he flies.
Second, the entire idea that an RJ pilot thinks a turboprop pilot is flying 2nd rate equipment is laughable. There was probably a 76 or other widebody pilot standing within earshot who could have just as easily put the GoJet pilot's SJS in his place, but even if there were, that 76 driver I'm sure had more respect for himself than to make such an egotistical and retarded comment.
Third, WTF does a GoJet pilot come off spouting an opinion to anyone about where they work and what they fly??
With the notable exception of helo guys. It's really unfortunate that the rotary wing guys are so ignored by the airlines.
Why do you think rotary wing time is so worthless to the majors?
I was under the impression that single pilot military flying was not held in as high a regard any more by the airlines due to the fact that 2-crew CRM skills obviously aren't needed in a single seat fighter jet. Yes, I know you coordinate over the radio with AWACS and all that jazz, but its not like working with and trusting another guy in the right seat. Is this somewhat true, or did someone feed me a bowl of BS?
I wasn't trying to say anything about fighter guys difficulty getting on vs. a cargo guy. I thought that when fighter guys swap their stuff over to the FAA multi commercial there was something about centerline thrust restriction, but I might be confusing it with something else. What I was basically trying to convey, is that the cargo guys that fly eqipment that is similar to or a military version of equipment flown by major airlines, have a slight advantage when it comes to HR looking at resumes.Definitely not. Fighter guys have never had difficulty getting on to majors due to being in a "small aircraft" or having "centerline thrust". If you have evidence to the contrary, I'd be interested to hear it...but fighter dudes have never had any more challenge getting hired than anyone from any other background.
Alternatively, the fighter guy is logging PIC multiengine turbine from the first day he gets to his squadron. In addition, the airlines recognize that his 1500 hours was logged while hand-flying 1.2 at a time, not 8.0 at a pop with the autopilot on.
I thought that when fighter guys swap their stuff over to the FAA multi commercial there was something about centerline thrust restriction, but I might be confusing it with something else.
I thought that when fighter guys swap their stuff over to the FAA multi commercial there was something about centerline thrust restriction, but I might be confusing it with something else.
What I was basically trying to convey, is that the cargo guys that fly eqipment that is similar to or a military version of equipment flown by major airlines, have a slight advantage when it comes to HR looking at resumes.
Thanks Tram!Yeh, they are centerline restricted..
To have that removed, they go up and do a couple VMC demos, shut down, restart the left engine a time or three and voila..
Done..
He ended up in the E-6b...Not saying there is anything wrong with the E-6b what so ever, but for a guy who would have taken anything that would have allowed him to fly off a boat, it made me chuckle to think, he prolly didn't do too hot during flight school to end up in one of the few land bases naval aircraft.
Wow! There is so much wrong with the post, I don't even know where to begin.
You don't have a problem with Freedom or GoJets? You should. The Freedom "A" guys could have ruined our profession. If JO got away with what he tried to pull, alter-ego carriers would be flying our flights for less pay and we'd be out of a job.
GoJets was another attempt to circumvent the work ALPA does to make our lives bearable in this industry. Those plane should be flown by Trans States Pilots, for much more pay then they're making.
Everything that is done in this industry reflects on everything else. Everyone takes from one carriers contracts and improves upon it for themselves. It's up to every carrier to help raise the rest of the industry up. If we stand idly by and let these carriers continue without resisting, management wins and screws us all.
This is not an every man for himself business, we all need to work together, both as individual pilot groups and as an industry as a whole.
As for the CAL scab thing, that's just ignorance at it's finest. Scabs are only scabs when a work group is on strike. The CAL strike was over and the union was back in place at Continental. The ones that were hired during the strike were scabs and always will be (forgiven or not). After that, unless they were to go out on strike, they are not scabs. That's the same as my FA calling me a scab because I'm crossing seat belts to tidy up the cabin.
Yeesh!
With the notable exception of helo guys. It's really unfortunate that the rotary wing guys are so ignored by the airlines.
Why do you think rotary wing time is so worthless to the majors?
I was under the impression that single pilot military flying was not held in as high a regard any more by the airlines due to the fact that 2-crew CRM skills obviously aren't needed in a single seat fighter jet. Yes, I know you coordinate over the radio with AWACS and all that jazz, but its not like working with and trusting another guy in the right seat. Is this somewhat true, or did someone feed me a bowl of BS?
This is so true. From what I've read in my CRM studies, the airlines found out that there were some accidents caused by the fact that the they hired many great stick and rudder guys from the military who brought the very strict chain of command into the flight deck. This was fine under many circumstances, until the Captain makes a mistake that the first officer might have caught.All I can tell you is that as a Navy C-9 IP, some of the hardest guys to train were the single seat fighter/attack guys. They were used to doing everything for themselves all the time. They weren't too good at the division of responsibilities. One ex-Marine A-4 driver was particularly amusing. If he was flying, he wanted to do it all...stick/rudder, nav radios, talk..everything. If he wasn't flying he was a 150 lb. sandbag.
Some of the easiest to train were guys who were currently working as Regional turboprop pilots. Why? Usually they were flying 8 or 9 short legs a day with no autopilot. Good sticks, good situational awareness, good crew skills.
Some of the easiest to train were guys who were currently working as Regional turboprop pilots. Why? Usually they were flying 8 or 9 short legs a day with no autopilot. Good sticks, good situational awareness, good crew skills.