Aloha stops flying: 61 years come to an end March 31

Well, this is pretty junk. Aloha is one of the reasons I wanted to become a pilot. Their planes are the first ones I've ever been in when my grandpa flew for them. So thats kind of a bummer.
 
Growing up in Hawaii, I often flew Aloha airlines. This local carrier has been around so long and is a true 'kama'aiana' company. If you've never taken a flight on Aloha airlines, you've surely missed the "Aloha" spirit that our 50th state is known for. It is a true tragedy when a honest-run, quality-based, airline with such high on-time performance is put out. Everyone here in Hawaii will lose because of this. EVERYONE. :(

I jumpseated on Aloha once, from HNL to OGG. Everyone from the gate agent to the pilots to the FAs were awesome. Its definitely sad to see a "homegrown" airline go away.

Thank you JO.

This just pissed me off. A friend of mine is without a job now because of that scum sucking lowlife Orenstein. :mad:

JO is to blame

I have a good friend that started there earlier this year. Now I guess she is out of a job. Its sucks to see stuff like this happen, especially when you have close friends there. However to blame this all on JO or Mesa is ridiculous. I think you guys are just looking for someone to point a finger at. Mesa is a business. It exists to make money. Contrary to popular belief airlines are run for profit (or at least supposed to be), not to enrich pilots.
 
Do some more research. Mesa wasn't operating as a legitimate competitor. The courts already awarded $80 million to Hawaiian from Mesa because of illegal practices from JO, and they'll probably award a lot more the Aloha's creditors assuming that that case goes forward. JO violated a confidentiality agreement that gave Mesa an unfair advantage and at least one other company executive took part in disposing of evidence illegally. The whole operation is despicable.
 
American Eagle.

Dont forget Pinnacle and Mesaba. Compass too, maybe?


Do some more research. Mesa wasn't operating as a legitimate competitor. The courts already awarded $80 million to Hawaiian from Mesa because of illegal practices from JO, and they'll probably award a lot more the Aloha's creditors assuming that that case goes forward. JO violated a confidentiality agreement that gave Mesa an unfair advantage and at least one other company executive took part in disposing of evidence illegally. The whole operation is despicable.

I know a lil about what happened. But seriously, you're telling me a "start up" GO! airlines that operates 4 crjs for took out a hometown airline of 60 plus years that operates 20 or so 737s in less than 2 years? come on now! I am sure it didnt help, but its definitely not the overwhelming cause of Aloha's demise.

I dont like JO, i am not advocating his management style. But I dont agree with people's assessment of Mesa killing Aloha.
 
I know a lil about what happened. But seriously, you're telling me a "start up" GO! airlines that operates 4 crjs for took out a hometown airline of 60 plus years that operates 20 or so 737s in less than 2 years? come on now! I am sure it didnt help, but its definitely the overwhelming cause of Aloha's demise.

I dont like JO, i am not advocating his management style. But I dont agree with people's assessment of Mesa killing Aloha.

Go! drove fares down to unimaginable levels, and the real Island carriers had to match to compete. JO openly admitted that he was taking massive losses to sap market share away from the legit carriers. Sorry, but JO killed Aloha. Burn in hell, Orenstein!
 
Go! drove fares down to unimaginable levels, and the real Island carriers had to match to compete. JO openly admitted that he was taking massive losses to sap market share away from the legit carriers. Sorry, but JO killed Aloha. Burn in hell, Orenstein!

Playing devil's advocate here:

Why couldn't Hawaiian and Aloha keep their fares at their existing prices? From what I could find Go! has 7 CRJ-200s, which isn't really going to hold a candle to a rather large fleet of 732, but I don't really know the load factors around Hawaii either. If JO was taking such a 'massive loss' to attempt to take away market share from the other competitors, which he would have done if he rock-bottomed prices and the other competitors stayed the same, you can only fit so many people on a CRJ on a specific route and time and anyone else traveling would be forced to fly on Aloha and Hawaiian. Would Aloha and Hawaiian lose a good majority of their business in this expenditure? Of course.

However, since JO was taking such a big loss, do you not think such a rather large airline in Hawaii could afford to stay in business longer than JO before JO's investors realized how much money they are losing and they stop backing him and he is forced to raise his prices up to respectable levels?

Just throwing some thoughts out there...
 
40 more Go! flights a day

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080331/lam099.html?.v=101

"In response to demand, we have significantly increased the number of flights in all markets providing high frequency service throughout the business day. We will continue to adjust our schedule to satisfy demand and work hard to provide the highest quality, lowest cost service to the people of Hawai'i." said Mr. Jonathan Ornstein, Mesa Air Group Chairman and CEO.
 
I know a lil about what happened. But seriously, you're telling me a "start up" GO! airlines that operates 4 crjs for took out a hometown airline of 60 plus years that operates 20 or so 737s in less than 2 years? come on now! I am sure it didnt help, but its definitely not the overwhelming cause of Aloha's demise.

I dont like JO, i am not advocating his management style. But I dont agree with people's assessment of Mesa killing Aloha.


Last summer, June I believe, go! was offering $2 one way fares to the neighbor islands. That's really hard to compete with- especially when you're not backed by a relatively larger company (Mesa) who could basically use the losses at go! as a tax write-off. I'm not upset with anyone employed by Mesa or go!. Just very sad to see Aloha leave.
 
Any word if Hawaiian will increase their schedule to assist the Aloha passengers? I know UAL is stepping in to help West Coast traffic, but they better NOT start inter-island travel.
 
Playing devil's advocate here:

Why couldn't Hawaiian and Aloha keep their fares at their existing prices? From what I could find Go! has 7 CRJ-200s, which isn't really going to hold a candle to a rather large fleet of 732, but I don't really know the load factors around Hawaii either. If JO was taking such a 'massive loss' to attempt to take away market share from the other competitors, which he would have done if he rock-bottomed prices and the other competitors stayed the same, you can only fit so many people on a CRJ on a specific route and time and anyone else traveling would be forced to fly on Aloha and Hawaiian. Would Aloha and Hawaiian lose a good majority of their business in this expenditure? Of course.

However, since JO was taking such a big loss, do you not think such a rather large airline in Hawaii could afford to stay in business longer than JO before JO's investors realized how much money they are losing and they stop backing him and he is forced to raise his prices up to respectable levels?

Just throwing some thoughts out there...

The problem is that Mesa is being subsidized by code-share traffic on the mainland. They can take heavy losses in the small Go! operation because it covered by income from the traditional code-share operations. Mesa could last practically indefinitely, even at those ridiculously low fares. If the real Hawaiian carriers refused to match his prices, then he would get 100% load factors and start bringing in more airplanes to keep sapping away business until eventually driving the real carriers out of business, at which point he would raise his own prices, of course.

But this is all ignoring the real problem: the whole operation was started under illegal circumstances!!! He violated a confidentiality agreement and destroyed evidence. Orenstein is the devil.
 
Re: 40 more Go! flights a day

Go increases flights from 54 to 94 daily departures beginning April 1st. WOW!!

This happens everyday in the world around us.

I think what we are seeing in the state of HI is a miniature version of what is going on/going to happen on the mainland. Go! is the ultra low LCC, Aloha is the legacy behemoth. Brace for it.
 
Re: 40 more Go! flights a day

Brace for it? How about doing something about it? Use your jumpseat to keep non-Union LCC pilots from commuting.

Its a start.
 
Re: 40 more Go! flights a day

Brace for it? How about doing something about it? Use your jumpseat to keep non-Union LCC pilots from commuting.

Its a start.

That won't stop it. It'll be like putting a straw in the ocean. You've got to change the way the public looks at these airlines.

I'd suggest ALPA runs some PSA ads during prime-time in the major markets describing the downsides to these types of airlines. Not to bash ALPA or any of the other unions for that matter, but I have not seen any type of public awareness campaign (aside from an occasional ad in USAToday). They've got out and educate the public with a hard and heavy campaign. It will cost money, but it's got to be done.
 
Re: 40 more Go! flights a day

From a public standpoint these ultra LCC's are great. Media attention won't help, it could possibly hurt by bringing free coverage to them.
 
Re: 40 more Go! flights a day

And that would be a total waste of money. All Americans care about is low fares. They couldn't give a fig if the F/O on their Skybus flight has a grand total of 350/50. All they're looking for is a $10 fare.

And while you're right that my proposal won't change anything in a macro sense, any time we can make it difficult for one of the jerks who take these jobs to commute, it tosses another little monkey wrench into their system.
 
Re: 40 more Go! flights a day

From a public standpoint these ultra LCC's are great. Media attention won't help, it could possibly hurt by bringing free coverage to them.

Which why ALPA has got to hit it hard with really damning commercials; a type of "scared straight" approach.

I can see one ad dealing with pilot fatigue, another dealing with poor maintenance, and another dealing with low time pilots and pay.

The theme could be "what are you really getting for your $50 fare?"
 
Re: 40 more Go! flights a day

And that would be a total waste of money. All Americans care about is low fares. They couldn't give a fig if the F/O on their Skybus flight has a grand total of 350/50. All they're looking for is a $10 fare.

And while you're right that my proposal won't change anything in a macro sense, any time we can make it difficult for one of the jerks who take these jobs to commute, it tosses another little monkey wrench into their system.

You know that Go!, which is operated by pilots on the Mesa seniority list, are ALPA, right?
 
Back
Top