alaskadrifter
Landing gear operator
Nulato in the 1900 was always sporting.I have done soft field Ops in a transport category aircraft. It was a turboprop though.
Nulato in the 1900 was always sporting.I have done soft field Ops in a transport category aircraft. It was a turboprop though.
While I agree with you in principal, I think we can conclude that flying cars and jet packs being made available to the public at large would lead to, shall we say, a less than optimal result.
FWIW, the 2nd jump seat on the 727 was pretty comfy.
Richman
The 737-200 has always been one of my favorite jets. I loved watching the reversers open on landing as a kid. From a flying perspective, a Part 91 you own the plane do what you want with it perspective that is, I see it as loud, smokey, and small enough to put around the sky a bit compared to bigger airliners while also being able to get into smaller airports As they're still around and relatively cheap, a dream of mine would be to have the money to get one restored and painted up in some airlines colors, fly the crap out of it in a display(well within it's structural limits of course), then donate it to a museum after that final flight. Better than the scrapyard.
Pilots fly, passengers ride.
Didn't know much about the gator, a little digging around helped me find this. Very cool!Used to ride on those all the time, and had a good few rides on the AF version, the T-43 Gator.
Interesting thing about the Gator, as a Navigator trainer aircraft with 10 student Navigator training panel/stations onboard; it was the only airplane that could be in 10 different places on earth at once, with only one of those being correct.
I loved watching the reversers open on landing as a kid.
DC-10/MD-11
You know you've been in one way too much when moving the seat is almost second nature.
Most comfortable jumpseat I've ever been in during the commuting portion of my career.
I LOVE the MD-11 jumpseat (the main one, not the small one behind the captain). It's like your own personal throne.
Man, it's great seeing the way people used to think back then. Want to demonstrate the capabilities of your new large transport category jet? Roll it over a highly publicized fair over a major city. Find yourself in British Columbia with your prototype 737 to show off? Find a 4,000 foot grass strip and fly it in and out. SFO Airport too far from the city at rush hour? Build helipads around the Bay Area and land at the TWA gates. Fog and IFR canceling your helicopter flights? Build a transport hovercraft to keep serving Downtown San Francisco and Oakland via those same gates at SFO.
Sure, planes, relatively, crashed all the time. But that must have been a damn fun time to be flying.
The 737-200 has always been one of my favorite jets. I loved watching the reversers open on landing as a kid. From a flying perspective, a Part 91 you own the plane do what you want with it perspective that is, I see it as loud, smokey, and small enough to put around the sky a bit compared to bigger airliners while also being able to get into smaller airports As they're still around and relatively cheap, a dream of mine would be to have the money to get one restored and painted up in some airlines colors, fly the crap out of it in a display(well within it's structural limits of course), then donate it to a museum after that final flight. Better than the scrapyard.
Technically the Airbus 320 was filling the niche that Boeing left because there were no real plans to replace the 150 seat 727. The 757 was supposed to be the medium cabin work horse.
I thought we'd be flying way more exciting stuff than we are in 2016. Yay, subsonic tube with engines… So exciting.
Rare, perhaps. Not unique.
Hey, I'm not bustin' your chops. It's just a linguistic pet peeve of mine.
When people say things like, "that's a very unique widget", it feels to me like fingernails on a blackboard. Unique is an absolute. Something is either unique or not. There's no modifying the degree of uniqueness. And there's only one of something that's unique. It's not like a simple typo. It's akin to people who say, "I could care less" when what they mean is exactly the opposite. To wit, "I could NOT care less". Take it or leave it, as you will. But think about it next time you interview. Speech is logic vocalized. How we speak denotes how we think. When one says something that means exactly the opposite of what one is trying to say, it means one is not really thinking about what one is saying. This can lead to problems.
"Schedule, pay, time off," in that order. The tube is just a tool that affords that.
Used to ride on those all the time, and had a good few rides on the AF version, the T-43 Gator.
Interesting thing about the Gator, as a Navigator trainer aircraft with 10 student Navigator training panel/stations onboard; it was the only airplane that could be in 10 different places on earth at once, with only one of those being correct.
C40A so much better![]()
![]()
I loved the 12 min flight from Whidbey to McChord in the C9....-200 vs -800, the C-40 is quite popular. P-8 too for that matter
I liked the old C-9Bs the C-40 replaced.
I loved the 12 min flight from Whidbey to McChord in the C9....
Partial to C40A as is was my last loggie job in Development Programs. I had Airstairs and combi equipment on that one.
-700 with -800 wing and gear. Oddball
If the tube is a torture device it matters.