Airshows shouldn't exist

Dexter

Hop off there, Blonde Ambition Tour
http://www.vice.com/read/why-the-•-do-air-shows-still-exist-193?utm_source=vicetwitterus
 
I take it that vice received too much flack for obvious ignorance? The link doesn't bring up the article.

If it has an engine, mankind will have fun with it. Fun can be predicted and "controlled" to be as safe as it can. Poop happens even when you're not having fun. More often I'd argue with the BS statistics that I made up in my head! :)
 
Nope! It is still there!
Ah, must be blocked because it has the "F word" (the best word) in the link?

It comes up here if JC doesn't block it.
http://www.vice.com/read/why-the-*I...ng a curse word*-do-air-shows-still-exist-193

*edit JC does block the link. It's a third of the way down on the page as of midnight AT. Dude lost me at "as a liberal". "As a conservative" would have me running away even more quickly, but someone that starts an argument with either IS an idiot. FACT!
 
I'm a numbers guy.

If it's all about "safety", well, we need to ban swimming pools and personal transportation.

Otherwise "banning" airshows is idiotic.

Along with the safety concerns around them, I am not a fan of my taxpayer dollars being used to 'thrill' some folks.

Opinions are like asses, everyone has them!
 
Nobody seems to want to ban Indy Car racing after another driver was killed today...

If we banned every type of "entertainment" that killed any participant or spectator, it would be a dull and boring existence.

So our taxpayer dollars should be used to entertain?
 
Opinions are like asses, everyone has them!

Is that your way of saying "agree to disagree" which no one actually does?

My state has a big tax-payer sponsored hole in the ground called the Grand Canyon which people fall into with some regularity.

It's a reactionary idea meant to get eyes on banner ads on a SEO'd internet posting. Like "Current Events Trolling for Dollars".

"Taxpayer Dollars" go for all sorts of things you may or may not agree with.
 
Back
Top