Airlines with Co-Domicile Ops

Reading comprehension @amorris311 ...

Seggy said:
Obviously, don't give it to the company for free, but don't be ridiculous and draw a line in the sand for pre-bankruptcy rates back to allow it.
Click to expand...


Seggy said:
Also, the way Delta is looking at this is that 'if our Flight Attendants can cover all three, then pilots should be able to do it as well'. That is the mentality you are fighting here. Find a way to get what you want with that mentality.
Click to expand...

With that said above Andrew, explain to me how I think Flight Attendants can do it so should pilots.

Once again, read what I say, and don't put words in my mouth.
 
@Seggy thanks for looking it up. I don't care enough about what you said to go back and look it up. I can bet you your next paycheck though that the general consensus on this thread is that you are on on your ass. You developed an argument that tried to parallel your contract at (your airline) to those that don't have a fraction of the work rules and protections. Nice try back peddling too and trying to re word what you were saying. I'm not putting words in your mouth either.
 
Last edited:
amorris311 said:
@Seggy thanks for looking it up. I don't care enough about what you said to go back and look it up. I can bet you your next paycheck though that the general consensus on this thread is that you are on on your ass.
Click to expand...

I have been called far worse in life.

In all seriousness, if people want to call me an ass when I have been saying SINCE THE START OF THIS THREAD that you don't roll over with this in negotiations, but they just want to think I am an ass because I am saying the concept actually helps pilots (with protections), well....that really isn't my problem.


You developed an argument that tried to parallel your contract at (your airline) to those that don't have a fraction of the work rules and protections. Nice try back peddling too and trying to re word what you were saying. I'm not putting words in your mouth either.
Click to expand...

Once again, you are pulling things out of thin air. This is what I said in post 60....

Then don't agree to them at a regional if they aren't put in there!
Click to expand...

I am not back peddling, I am not rewording what I said, you ARE putting words in my mouth.
 
Seggy said:
I have been called far worse in life.

In all seriousness, if people want to call me an ass when I have been saying SINCE THE START OF THIS THREAD that you don't roll over with this in negotiations, but they just want to think I am an ass because I am saying the concept actually helps pilots (with protections), well....that really isn't my problem.




Once again, you are pulling things out of thin air. This is what I said in post 60....



I am not back peddling, I am not rewording what I said, you ARE putting words in my mouth.
Click to expand...
Didn't you suggest that airlines can do this? Wasn't it you who threw out LAX/SNA as a co domicile which works? It wasn't until later that you started to agree that it takes contract+managers+pilot group to make these things work. You worked for for these companies and you know why this will not work.
 
Seggy said:
I hate to, but I am going to drag @Gonzo into this...didn't he say that it does work at the regional he is at?
Click to expand...
So? PSA and SKW thinks it's fine to operate all of the CRJ's as one group. What is your point? They have different work rules and a different foundation then endeavor does. The hard part for you is that you don't remember or even know what the current contract is with PCL. Trying to get the work rules that eagle has in order for it to work is going to be nothing short of getting the same pre bk work rules back on property. Yet you think big scary DAL management will just roll these guys over. So please once again enlighten us to what you think should be in the contract in order for it to work.
 
amorris311 said:
So? PSA and SKW thinks it's fine to operate all of the CRJ's as one group. What is your point?
Click to expand...

My point is that if the proper contractual foundation is in place, then pilots should look to do it as it can help themselves. Dual qual is great, but proper protections need to be in place. Are they at PSA and SKW? I have no idea. But the Endeavor Pilots shouldn't agree to dual qual unless proper contractual protections are in place.

They have different work rules and a different foundation then endeavor does.
Click to expand...
Why are you so concerned about that? If the company wants something and can't deliver what needs to make it work, it is 'dead on arrival'. I have already stated that of course, but you glance over it to create D-R-A-M-A.

The hard part for you is that you don't remember or even know what the current contract is with PCL.
Click to expand...

No I remember vividly.

So please once again enlighten us to what you think should be in the contract in order for it to work.
Click to expand...

For what dual qual or co-domicle basing?
 
Seggy said:
Only ass that is being gotten into is me to @amorris311 because he has no reading comprehension skills.
Click to expand...

@amorris311 got in that ass, Larry.

Unknown.jpeg
 
9E pilots have taken what Bloch gave them, they have taken what the dispute resoluation process said, they have taken their severe loss of seniority and loss of Captain seats, they have taken huge concessions and capped their way at near industry lows, so do you really think a LGA co-domicile is going to be the straw that breaks the camels back? Given past history and how they've rolled over, a LGA co domicile will come if management wants it. The group has already showed management they roll over.
 
Not the hijack the thread, but if whats on APC is correct then Frontier is running a co-domicile between ORD and MDW, which started under Republic ownership... I wonder what their contract looks like for co-domicile.. I'm not really saying anything, really just curious and putting that question out there.
 
Cherokee_Cruiser said:
9E pilots have taken what Bloch gave them, they have taken what the dispute resoluation process said, they have taken their severe loss of seniority and loss of Captain seats, they have taken huge concessions and capped their way at near industry lows, so do you really think a LGA co-domicile is going to be the straw that breaks the camels back? Given past history and how they've rolled over, a LGA co domicile will come if management wants it. The group has already showed management they roll over.
Click to expand...

Are comments like these really necessary?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top