ADX knowledge test

[wrightstuffdispatch]

I know that Sheppard does a good job, but I had a really good experience with Gleim software. I never understood why people just did not get the software and put the effort into studying. You are spending a ton of money on the certificate, just do it right and get a good grade on the written. We all know that the less success you have on the written the more challenging your practical will be.

 

[who'swho]

I know that Sheppard does a good job, but I had a really good experience with Gleim software. I never understood why people just did not get the software and put the effort into studying. You are spending a ton of money on the certificate, just do it right and get a good grade on the written. We all know that the less success you have on the written the more challenging your practical will be.

Gleim was great. I scored a 96 using it. I blame the Gleim software for the score. I really liked how you could format it for whatever testing software you would be using. That to me really made taking the test a much more familiar/comfortable experience.

 

[manniax]

We all know that the less success you have on the written the more challenging your practical will be.

Actually, I found the written had very little to do with practical dispatching and was quite outdated. It is good to get the written out of the way so that you can concentrate on your practical, of course. It has been many years since I took the written but I don't think it's changed any since then. While I did get a good grade on the written, I don't think it would have mattered if I barely passed it - in all my interviews after school and over the course of my career, I think precisely one place asked what my score was on the written - and they were not an airline.