T-1s!!!!!
do whatever you want to do man. the T-1 and T-38 drop come out of two totally separate pools so it really is all about timing......
have they stopped dropping UAVs or are they back to that?
Word is they've stopped dropping UAVs but you never know, I remember one dropping after they told us it wasn't going to happen anymore. T-1s seem like a lot of fun and I think having a crew would be awesome, not to mention you get to travel a lot.
T-1s!!!!!
do whatever you want to do man. the T-1 and T-38 drop come out of two totally separate pools so it really is all about timing......
have they stopped dropping UAVs or are they back to that?
Word is they've stopped dropping UAVs but you never know, I remember one dropping after they told us it wasn't going to happen anymore. T-1s seem like a lot of fun and I think having a crew would be awesome, not to mention you get to travel a lot.
and depending on the heavy you fly, you can make A LOT more money (not that it should be a determining factor), but we have bedrooms, ovens, fridges, bathrooms, etc...the creature comforts are different among airframes.
Then again, you could get a C-21.
That said - the fighter world is brutal. I'm just finishing the Viper B course and already I'm exhausted, with no additional duties, from 12+ hour days and spending all my spare time in the vault. So understand that there are pros and cons to both tracks. I do think the -38 will give you more options since they are dropping heavies out of those too. Just don't get slow in the final turn...
Just curious, how many days per month does it take a TR at a fighter unit to stay current on all beans?
I guess I'm biased and don't get my wrong, I have tons of respect for the heavy drivers out there, but I think if you go T-1's you will always wonder "what's it like to fly one of those pointy fast jets?" And for good reason, because it's pretty damn cool.
That said - the fighter world is brutal. I'm just finishing the Viper B course and already I'm exhausted, with no additional duties, from 12+ hour days and spending all my spare time in the vault. So understand that there are pros and cons to both tracks. I do think the -38 will give you more options since they are dropping heavies out of those too. Just don't get slow in the final turn...
I tend to agree here and of course, I flew the Navy version of "heavies" in the fleet from the boat. Granted, I put strike first but got my second, E2/C2 and now fly T-45C Goshawks. I was certainly happy in the end but if I were given the chance to chose, I would take the pointy nose stuff. The flying is much more demanding, even from little clown jet trainers. I know a lot of the Hornet/Harrier types are burnt out and that's why they go to the VT's, a lot less stuff to know and train. I think one can always go heavies later on? No? In the Navy, it's not easy to go from E-6B's or E-2's to strike.
I was told by a guy I work with who is former F/A-18, that C-2s is the "hidden gem" assignment that no one tells you about in flight school, and that as his career progressed, he wished he'd known that.
I was told by a guy I work with who is former F/A-18, that C-2s is the "hidden gem" assignment that no one tells you about in flight school, and that as his career progressed, he wished he'd known that.
That's probably the way it was in the past, though I will say that when I went through more recently, we were all definitely well aware of the COD and it's good deal. That being said, in spite of that knowledge, a lot of guys (myself included) still just wanted a grey jet at the end of the day, which a COD is not. Also, nowadays, you fly the T-45 for a good 4-6 months before you ever choose between E2C2 and strike, and after that pain (of intermediate jets) and seeing your friends doing all the cool strike syllabus flights, it is maybe a tough pill to swallow for some. And even if you are one of those guys that really wants CODs, you still have to put up with the very likely possibility that you will end up in E-2's rather than CODs once they count heads and give assignments at VAW-120. I knew a couple guys that voluntarily went E2C2 out of T-45's, and I think they are both glad they did, but most of the others just didn't have the grades to keep on keepin on in the advanced/strike syllabus in -45's. It's a weird paradox, because the ultimate test of night CQ is probably much easier in the Hornet......at least it seems that way after comparing my own experience, and those of friends who fly E-2's. Of course they don't have to deal with the tactics, the single-seat mentality, the monumental hours of studying, the every flight a checkride type lifestyle. Would I trade? No, absolutely not....but I would have definitely said yes a while ago, after I got my wings and was staring down the barrel of the RAG.
as i was discussing with bunk, I was told, that with that track chance of promotions were slim.I was told by a guy I work with who is former F/A-18, that C-2s is the "hidden gem" assignment that no one tells you about in flight school, and that as his career progressed, he wished he'd known that.
Yeah, that would be another benefit of the C-2 route....a good opportunity to go back to T-45's and do some fun flying on a shore tour. I doubt there are as many VFA types beating down the door, with TOPGUN, FRS, TPS, CAG Paddles tours and the like being higher on the list. I knew of more than a couple C-2 and E-2 IP's during my time in Meridian, and it sounded like they were having a great time.
as i was discussing with bunk, I was told, that with that track chance of promotions were slim.