AA New Paint

I'm sorry, are we pilots or do we drive Greyhound busses? Because that scheme belongs on the side of a bus.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 
I'm sorry, are we pilots or do we drive Greyhound busses? Because that scheme belongs on the side of a bus.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Someone has a self inflated sense of purpose, the sheer arrogance of pilots. You're not white collar, you're blue.
You go to work and you transport X amount of people from point A to point B and you do it safely. Whatever paint scheme is on the side of the plane doesn't matter, and totally has no effect on your job performance, safety or morale.

You are a bus driver (a transporter), you do "drive" Greyhounds in the sky.

Get over yourself!
 
I think we are losing a part of Aviation history. I understand the need to be like everyone e.lse but there is something to say for tradition
 
You can't have bare aluminum livery if the aircraft isn't made of aluminum.

Edit: perhaps now they won't request deviations around cumulus clouds because they just got washed (true story)
 
Any wagers on when the merger announcement will come? Ill guess before the end of the month.
 
This is like SureJet all over again...only in visual form. :eek:


I kind of liked this one some anet nerd created.

livery.jpg

It's interesting that people like that can create something on their own that is far and away better than what a design firm created for what probably amounted to millions of dollars.

I'd change the teal(?) to red and the light grey to blue, but the over all concept is a good one. Far, far better than the...the...I don't think there are words in the English language to describe what AA did.
 
Man that is ugly - which is disapointing seeing as how the livery seemed to be one of few bright spots for them... I read it was because the 787 had to have paint.
 
I'm surprised that some of you keep bringing up the issue with "extra cost", "they are bankrupt and why are they spending extra money on new logo?", "where did they get the money? it's going to cost extra".
The repainting of the planes will not cost the airline extra, as all new planes have to be painted when they are delivered and every plane in every airlines fleet has to go through a D check per FAA safety guidelines. During the D Check, all paint is removed, as is all of the cabin, so that maintenance can check for structural weakness, broken rivets, and any other wear & tear on the plane. Following the D check the planes have to be repainted (either in the old design or a new one) Thus the cost of painting is already going to happen no matter what. American Just like every other airline will paint the planes in phases and probably take at least a year , maybe more to get all the planes in the new livery. It is also very typical to rebrand when exiting bankruptcy as you want customers to see a fresh new look rather than a look associated with bankruptcy. anyways as of what do i think of the design, it looks alright.
 
Someone has a self inflated sense of purpose, the sheer arrogance of pilots. You're not white collar, you're blue.
You go to work and you transport X amount of people from point A to point B and you do it safely. Whatever paint scheme is on the side of the plane doesn't matter, and totally has no effect on your job performance, safety or morale.

You are a bus driver (a transporter), you do "drive" Greyhounds in the sky.

Get over yourself!

Joke.

Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk 2
 
Saw this the other day in MSP.. I like it!

RetroAAAstro.jpg

The lightning bolt on polished aluminum was the single greatest airline livery ever. EVER. This new scheme looks like Where's Waldo and the move away from polished aluminum is terrible. Yeah, the paint job doesn't mean squat to anyone, except that most of us are probably here because we have some sentimental, emotional attachment to airline history. So moving away from a livery that stood for so long as a mark of a [once] great airline tradition to the beige and uninspired look that most airlines are apparently content with is, at the very least, disheartening to me.
 
Back
Top