The former AMR CEO (sorry, I forgot his name) was on CNBC today calling for the gov't to enforce larger planes, less frequency, and (surprisingly) more train service between NYC and DC. I can't say I disagree with him, but I am also aware of the consequences to pilots in that scenario. Frequency is great for the traveler, but efficiency is better for the airlines. Guess which one will eventually win.
:whatever:
What I "get" is your obvious lack of understanding of the word "OFFER."
I repeat - read slowly, okay? : There were two OFFERS (meaning - two entities OFFERED to buy Eagle), but neither wanted to continue being AA's regional feeder - hence the OFFERS were rejected by..................
:whatever:
What I "get" is your obvious lack of understanding of the word "OFFER."
I repeat - read slowly, okay? : There were two OFFERS (meaning - two entities OFFERED to buy Eagle), but neither wanted to continue being AA's regional feeder - hence the OFFERS were rejected by..................
That's what I thought was the plan initially. I didn't know they were looking to sell it to someone or investment group. Who'd buy an airline now? Wait...I forgot about the recent entrants. Scratch that. :buck:
It is all of the regional flying. Eagle is in charge of handling all feed for AA, so I wouldn't be surprised to see Eagle try to protect its own.
That said, today Bowler said that there is an alarming percentage (wouldn't specify) of flights that can not even cover the VARIABLE COSTS of a flight (fuel, wages, fees, etc) much less the leases and other fixed costs. Those flights are going bye bye.
AA should have their schedule for us 15 June and I'll have more info 17 June. I'm not sure if I'll be able to share though, that is if I still have a job
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.