well, just to be totally machiavellian: the "footprint" of environmental damage from a crash is far lower than that produced by spreading jet fuel over many square miles....
(ducks to avoid being hit by inevitable flaming responses)
In all seriousness, for the sake of argument, if the fuel needs to be dumped, why not dump over the ocean instead of an island?
The "Channel Islands" just refers to an area of OCEAN dotted with islands of the coast of Southern CA.
Also, jet fuel tends to dissipate when dumped from altitude and breaks up before it hits the ground. So its environmental impact will be small regardless of where it's dumped.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.