A reflection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roger, Roger
  • Start date Start date
R

Roger, Roger

Guest
From listening to conversation in the FBO lounge.

If you tell your student that ground school is "wasting time" then you're probably teaching your ground school wrong.
 
From listening to conversation in the FBO lounge.

If you tell your student that ground school is "wasting time" then you're probably teaching your ground school wrong.

Interesting conversation I bet that was....
 
If you tell your student that ground school is "wasting time" then you're probably teaching your ground school wrong.

:banghead: That is just silly.

I would like to add to this thread, I had an interesting conversation for few hours today with an early student. He has been a teacher for most of his life and is in his mid 30s. He said, "Aviation is an archaic society in that it believes experience is the only real way to gain knowledge." He went on to discuss how ideas are often rejected, without analysis, just because a person has fewer hours, especially in the field of flight instruction.

I thought it was interesting to hear a career teacher say something that I have been yapping about on here for months. His primary field of study is in experiential education, not flight, which directly pertains to how flying is taught.
 
what was the rest of the conversation like? How do you know the instructor teaches the ground school? You know, it IS possible that the ground school this student is enrolled in IS a waste of time.
 
what was the rest of the conversation like? How do you know the instructor teaches the ground school? You know, it IS possible that the ground school this student is enrolled in IS a waste of time.

Good question. We don't know........none of us knows the context of the conversation, except for the OP. Thats why I thought that the conversation was probably interesting, at least.
 
He was talking to a prospective customer. The context was along the lines of "I like my private guys to study a lot so we don't have to waste a lot of time doing ground school". So in context, not necessarily totally bad. However, I have yet to have a student with whom I felt like ground time was "wasted". In fact, as I gained more experience, I tended to do MORE ground instruction with my students.

Some other interesting things popped up during the conversation.
"most people finish the private in around 40-45 hours"
"we have a Cessna 310R with IO-520s we're working on getting for multi training" (my boss WAS going to put his 310G with IO-470s on leaseback, but the insurance made it too much of a hassle)
This part made me think of some of the posts jrh made a while ago (dunno if I can find 'em) about how and how not to sell flight training. Made me wish I'd paid closer attention.

So really, nothing against my co-worker. But some of the snippets of conversation got me thinking about what I would say and how I would say it while talking to a prospective student. Mind you, I've never had to attract my own students so it's one of those new things for me.
 
Hopefully a competent instructor can get hold of this student before he driven off by stupidity. Flying is a hobby for a lot of people. We must be careful that our students don't find another hobby.

I do agree that certain bits of ground school can be a waste of money. I'd rather review and question/discuss with a students regarding what they have already studied. If I'm holding his finger while he reads the texts (that he didn't read on his own)... then that is a waste of his money. If he is ok wasting his money, and aware that he is doing so, then I'm fine with helping him do it. I've never heard of an instuctor getting killed while reading a textbook.
 
Only time I talk about ground being a waste of time and money is when they need to do extra because of not studying at home. Why would you want to pay for something when you could get it for free?

Unfortunately it seems to take an entire private course to get them to understand and then instrument and commercial flow a bit smoother.
 
He was talking to a prospective customer. The context was along the lines of "I like my private guys to study a lot so we don't have to waste a lot of time doing ground school".

You're right, that's not a very good way to talk to a prospective customer, but not entirely because it downplays ground school (although that part isn't good either).

I wouldn't talk like that because:

1) Using terms like, "my private guys," is too informal and puts the customer in too much of a subordinate role. It's like calling a customer a student. It just isn't good. Most adults don't want to be considered somebody else's student. It makes them feel like they're in sixth grade again. I use terms like, "...other customers I've worked with..." because it keeps them sounding equal, if not superior to me. It's a subliminal ego thing.

2) Saying anything about "wasting time" is bad because it unnecessarily brings up a negative idea. You don't want prospective customers thinking anything less than ideal will happen during their training. You want them to feel like they're dealing with professionals who wouldn't even consider doing something that is a "waste." Waste isn't an option, it's not on the table, it doesn't exist at your school.

Saying something like, "Of course it's better to study in advance in order to make the time we spend together more efficient," puts everything in positive terms while conveying the exact same idea.

So in context, not necessarily totally bad. However, I have yet to have a student with whom I felt like ground time was "wasted". In fact, as I gained more experience, I tended to do MORE ground instruction with my students.

I'm the same way.

Some other interesting things popped up during the conversation.
"most people finish the private in around 40-45 hours"
"we have a Cessna 310R with IO-520s we're working on getting for multi training"

Haha! Did the prospective customer look completely confused?

The problem with these things is that unless a person has been exposed to aviation, they have no idea about hours, engines, or model numbers. They'll smile and nod on the outside, but they're feeling confused/overwhelmed inside.

With regard to time frames for training, I don't say *anything* about flight hours. I ask if they have a goal they'd like to be done by. If they do, then I say, "Oh, yeah, great, that's no problem. If you took (X number) of flights per week, you can get finished by then for sure."

If they don't have a goal, I say training is very self-paced. The fastest we've had a customer finish training in was start to finish in six weeks, while others have spread their training out over a couple years. However you want to do it, we can make it happen.

When it comes to equipment, I tell them we fly Cessna 172s. They're single engine, four seat aircraft that are super popular, safe, easy to fly trainers. Talk to a dozen pilots and probably six or eight of them will tell you they learned to fly in a Cessna. That's all most people care about.

The overall theme of our presentation is finding out how a person wants aviation to fit in to their life, then explaining in simple terms how we can make it happen. Most people don't care about nitty gritty details, they only want to feel like they're in good hands.

Something I should add with this, and it might sound obvious, but it's worth mentioning: To make a convincing case to the customer, *you* have to be convinced that *you* are the best place for that customer to train. The customer truly is better off with you than your competition. Customers can tell the difference between somebody who's presenting with a shaky attitude of, "Well...ummmm....yeah, we're pretty good, you know, you'll probably like flying here," compared to, "Why on Earth would you want to fly at any other school??? This is where you need to be, end of story!" If you don't see the value of your own operation, how can you expect to pass on a positive vibe to the customer?

This part made me think of some of the posts jrh made a while ago (dunno if I can find 'em) about how and how not to sell flight training. Made me wish I'd paid closer attention.

Were either of these threads what you were thinking of?

http://forums.jetcareers.com/1251667-post14.html

http://forums.jetcareers.com/cfi-corner/93498-learn-fly-handout.html

I love talking about this stuff.

So really, nothing against my co-worker. But some of the snippets of conversation got me thinking about what I would say and how I would say it while talking to a prospective student.

That's exactly why we tell the instructors at my school to refer prospective customers to either myself or the owner. Even well-intentioned instructors have a knack for goofing things up by accident.

It takes a lot of practice and mentoring to get good at presenting flying to new people. My boss and I spend a lot of time bouncing ideas off each other for how to present these things as clearly and persuasively as possible. It would be nearly impossible to pass on our experience and expertise to a new instructor overnight.

We set up our operation sort of like how mechanics operate in a car dealership. Car dealerships hire mechanics to be just that, mechanics. Come to work and fix cars. Be experts at fixing cars. Other people handle the sales, accounting, etc. around the dealership.

In a flight school, we think it works best if the instructors just show up, teach, and get really good at the teaching. We don't expect them to be good at selling flight training, that's what my job is for.
 
JRH-
Thanks for that. It has been duly noted for whenever I get time to do some teaching.
 
In a flight school, we think it works best if the instructors just show up, teach, and get really good at the teaching. We don't expect them to be good at selling flight training, that's what my job is for.

Great post, one question. Who is responsible, for lack of a better word, to keep in contact with the student? I don't mean making them come back. I mean is he/she responsible for remembering if it has been two weeks since one has shown up and make a call just to check up.
 
Only time I talk about ground being a waste of time and money is when they need to do extra because of not studying at home. Why would you want to pay for something when you could get it for free?

I love it when they don't study. We don't fly until we cover what they should have already studied. Result: I get paid to talk about aviation, and I get to hear the sound of my own voice. :D
 
Great post, one question. Who is responsible, for lack of a better word, to keep in contact with the student? I don't mean making them come back. I mean is he/she responsible for remembering if it has been two weeks since one has shown up and make a call just to check up.

Prior to the person committing to training (when they're still considered "prospective") I handle everything. Usually right after we first meet them we send them a thank you card for visiting, then a week or two later I'll call or e-mail them to see what they're thinking about if I haven't heard from them. Keeping the ball rolling right after meeting them is really critical. If there's no contact within the first two weeks of initially meeting a person, the chances of them flying with us drop off dramatically.

After they're training and flying on a regular basis, it's kind of a shared responsibility between me and the instructor.

We have automated reports in our computer system that lists off the next appointment scheduled for all of our customers, sorted by instructor. So for instance, I can print a list of all of the customers assigned to Instructor Bill and see when they're scheduled to come in next, or if they're not scheduled at all.

If I see they're scheduled some time in the future, I just let it be. I leave it up to the instructor to keep in contact and keep making progress with them. If I see a customer who doesn't have anything scheduled in the future, I ask Instructor Bill what's up with that person. If they have a good reason for not being on the schedule, I let it go. If the instructor says, "Yeah, I don't know, Customer Bobby said he'd call me last week but I never heard from him," then I go to work calling Customer Bobby to find out why he's not on the schedule.

Does that answer your question?
 
Does that answer your question?

Yes, thank you very much. If it is alright, I might PM you for some more details on your scheduling set up.

The site I have currently is set for individual scheduling/tracking. Though group scheduling/tracking will eventually be incorporated (for schools). It sounds like you have a wealth of knowledge in that area and I wouldn't mind picking your brain for some of it. Thanks again.
 
:banghead: That is just silly.

I would like to add to this thread, I had an interesting conversation for few hours today with an early student. He has been a teacher for most of his life and is in his mid 30s. He said, "Aviation is an archaic society in that it believes experience is the only real way to gain knowledge." He went on to discuss how ideas are often rejected, without analysis, just because a person has fewer hours, especially in the field of flight instruction.

I thought it was interesting to hear a career teacher say something that I have been yapping about on here for months. His primary field of study is in experiential education, not flight, which directly pertains to how flying is taught.

Experience is very important for flying. You can't study ballistics and strategy for 20 years and be a star quarterback. That'd be due to the need for quick thinking in a variety of situations just as much as motor skill. The more you do, the easier it is to deal with new situations and identify problems. "Been there, done that" is always preferred to, "Huh, that's new."

That said, experience isn't everything, the need for proper instruction is paramount. Not everyone dismisses new ideas with no analysis. Could be with all that experience, they don't need to to much analyzing - probably heard it before ;)
 
Experience is very important for flying.

Your comparing apples and oranges, maybe it is my fault for being unclear. The important part of this was, "especially in the field of flight instruction." Flying has been around and studied for a little over 100 years now. Teaching dates back to the cave men and psychology, from my research, dates back to the 1500s.

Here is a for instance, trial and error learning: I doubt anyone here will argue that we don't learn through trial and error in flight training. According to psychology, this type of learning works when an error that occurs is analyzed, understood, and corrective action is taken. What do you think the chances are, in the first 10 flight lessons, that even half of the errors are caught? Of those that are discussed, how often do you think students leave with a complete understanding of their error?

A great deal of errors go unnoticed because there are simply to many. Any error that goes unnoticed will now likely repeat and be practiced, thus being harder to correct. I would bet, due to the short debriefs I often saw, that many students who did make errors went away without a real understanding of why. So what will they do? The probability of a repeat doubles.

I don't see how this can be argued, 75 percent of accidents are still pilot error. That stat hasn't changed for at least 50 years. Of course, neither has flight instruction, at least not the core design.
 
Back
Top