A lot of Union talk lately, so why.....

Dude you were on a roll.

Minnesota Flyer is a lawyer, who as I understand it specializes in labor. He knows what he's talking about.
 
I agree with Velo. I am completely in favor of a unionized pilot group nationwide. I am a little disappointed with ALPA and their efforts of late. I also believe the tactics of marching with signs and inflatable over-grown rats in front of corporate offices is also something that needs to be addressed. I believe pilots need to act like the true professionals we are and resort to business-like negotiation tactics rather than marching yelling "fair wages, fair healthcare." We as pilots hold a lot of power at the airlines, it's time we start acting like it.

ALPA needs an overhaul.

Gonna have to disagree. The right to assemble and protest are some of the very foundations that this country was built on, much the same as free speech.

Now, if you're arguing how effective those protest are in the site of either the public, or management, then I might maybe see your point.

But, I don't see the protest/rallies in and of itself as unprofessional!
 
Some might disagree with me on this one, but I don't believe pilots understand the power that they hold. If everyone was on the same page, we could shut down a majority of the airline system. If ALPA truly worked, when [insert airline name here] goes on strike all ALPA members go on strike. One of the major problems with ALPA is that it looks out for only certain groups at a time. ASA has been in negotiations for 5+ years. That is horrible. ASA pilots should shut that b*tch down. Imagine when ASA goes on strike that every ALPA member goes on strike with them. Management knows that pilots are only about themselves.
 
Protesting out on the street with the signs and the whole bit can get visibility out into the public domain whereas a lot of union bargaining can be made behind closed doors or less public. When the Dallas Morning News puts up a huge picture of guys stomping about AA it gets the word out their that things are not rosy. Sometimes just that visibility can hurt the company in lost outside investment.

Yes solid union action is better but I would not discount an old fashioned march in front of headquarters.
 
Gonna have to disagree. The right to assemble and protest are some of the very foundations that this country was built on, much the same as free speech.

Now, if you're arguing how effective those protest are in the site of either the public, or management, then I might maybe see your point.

But, I don't see the protest/rallies in and of itself as unprofessional!

Both. I argue their effectiveness and in turn, question why we're still engaging in such activities.

I am a businessman Max. I've never made any decent deals on real estate or medical devices by chanting outside my customers' workplace. I believe that negotiation is the most powerful tool any businessman can use and you better believe, we as pilots are nothing more than businessmen and women trying to negotiate a price for our service.

You dont see rallies/protests as "unprofessional" and thats fine, its your opion. However, I think there is a better way.
 
Protesting out on the street with the signs and the whole bit can get visibility out into the public domain whereas a lot of union bargaining can be made behind closed doors or less public. When the Dallas Morning News puts up a huge picture of guys stomping about AA it gets the word out their that things are not rosy. Sometimes just that visibility can hurt the company in lost outside investment.

Yes solid union action is better but I would not discount an old fashioned march in front of headquarters.

I agree that it does merit something to stand out there with the signs and 10' tall rat but I also question how much the airline using public cares.

Investors is another story. They do care how work relations are between mgmt and labor are. It's divulged in almost every market analysis report I've ever read.
 
I can think of a number of members of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers who would take issue with your statement. Although you are correct about individual bargaining units, the railroad unions prove that there can be a LOT more collective muscle flexed than ALPA does.

You are correct about the railroad unions (except it's the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen :) ), but that strength is the result of an agreement between 7 of the major railroad unions that none of the 7 would make any agreement with management unless all of the 7 agreed (there's some interesting stuff on that here -- http://www.teamster.org/05news/nr_050103_1.htm ).

ALPA could do the same thing; all they have to do is get the pilots at, say, American, Delta, Southwest, United, Northwest, US Airways, and Continental on the same page. Considering the pilots at US Airways are not on the same page with themselves right now, I would hazard a guess that the likelihood of pulling together 7 major pilot groups would be somewhere between snowball's chance and bupkiss.

In addition, to really do what the railroad unions did, you would have to get the airlines to bargain as one. And I really doubt anyone could talk them in to that. (I don't know the history behind the consolidated bargaining in the railroad industry; if you have some information on that, please share -- I'd be interested to know.)
 
Thanks to you all. I am learning a lot. I am going to research more on trade unions, both pros and cons. I know a few people heavy in the politics in a couple of other professional unions that I will be contacting as well as I learn more.

The BEST part of this thread was how no one got into personal attacks or mean spirited negative responses, Thank You.:)
 
Both. I argue their effectiveness and in turn, question why we're still engaging in such activities.

I am a businessman Max. I've never made any decent deals on real estate or medical devices by chanting outside my customers' workplace. I believe that negotiation is the most powerful tool any businessman can use and you better believe, we as pilots are nothing more than businessmen and women trying to negotiate a price for our service.

You dont see rallies/protests as "unprofessional" and thats fine, its your opion. However, I think there is a better way.

Comparing your business deals either real estate or medical devices to the CBA process is comparing apples to oranges.

Negotiation is great in and of itself. Don't you think that the pilots at ASA or PNCL want to negotiate with the company, after 5 yrs. don't you think ASA pilots are ready for a contract?

But when the RLA greatly favors management, and they're holding all the cards, what can you do?

The only thing available to you, hurt the companies media image.
 
Both. I argue their effectiveness and in turn, question why we're still engaging in such activities.

I am a businessman Max. I've never made any decent deals on real estate or medical devices by chanting outside my customers' workplace. I believe that negotiation is the most powerful tool any businessman can use and you better believe, we as pilots are nothing more than businessmen and women trying to negotiate a price for our service.

You dont see rallies/protests as "unprofessional" and thats fine, its your opion. However, I think there is a better way.

I am taking it you are/were in sales? Sales is completely different than a "limited" trade. What someone does in terms of how much wealth is made and how much effort they put in sales is completely dictated by the individual salesman. There is never a reason for a salesmen to strike or protest unless someone breaks a sales contract. Thats one reason I enjoyed sales based positions, sky is the limit.

How could the average airline pilot negotiate with people that would make a difference in the fight? They can't, thats why there are designated individuals that do the negotiating for the masses.

Also if there was one national union for all commercial pilots that would not be the end all regarding work related problems. If the airlines got completely fed up with the national union they could always flip the union the bird and restructure complete airlines to 100% non-union airlines with most likely very little effort to convince the share holders. Then more and more non-union airlines will start popping up.

I am not convinced that complete uniformity across the board is the correct answer to this industries labor disputes.

-Ryan
 
Here's a thought that would never work for a variety of reasons but is worth throwing out there: a single union for all airline labor groups much like the seaman unions before 1980 (I don't know if they're this strong anymore, I'm inclined to think not because you can go right to lines and look for a job nowadays). Imagine if not only every airline's planes couldn't fly due to a pilot strike, but an airline's bottom line was also affected because of no ticket selling, no aircraft maintenance (smaller nonunionized airlines who outsource to majors would also be greatly affected), and even no plant maintenance and the like. The Teamsters could almost organize something like this.
 
we as pilots are nothing more than businessmen and women trying to negotiate a price for our service

Here's your problem. You think of yourself as a businessman. You're not. You may think of yourself that way, but management, the government, the investors, the media, etc... view you as just another blue collar worker. Management views you as nothing but a line item on a balance sheet that has a pesky habit of demanding more funding every 3-6 years. They have no intention of negotiating in good faith with you, and the media, the government, and the investors are certainly not going to see your side of it and help you out. The only leverage you have to force management to the table comes from activities like picketing that scares the public and depresses business, not to mention that it demonstrates to management that the pilot group is unified and a force to be reckoned with. You have the same problem that too many pilots have had throughout the history of the profession: you think you're a white collar businessman when you're really just another blue collar worker as far as everyone else is concerned.
 
If ALPA truly worked, when [insert airline name here] goes on strike all ALPA members go on strike.

Captain Woerth was starting to consider the idea of "secondary boycotts," which is just the legal term for sympathy strikes. I haven't heard the same kinds of ideas from Prater, so I'm not sure if we'll see any of that during his term in office. It is perfectly legal under the RLA, however.
 
you think you're a white collar businessman when you're really just another blue collar worker as far as everyone else is concerned.

Glad you think so highly of pilots social status.

Guess what? ALPA hasn't done much for anyone lately. Just ask USAir pilots or any other group that has been stomped on. ALPA needs to revise their tactics. Most pilots are ready for a new union.

Picketing outside a major airport doesn't do much for the public. They already think we're overpaid as it is. If I had a $1 for every time I heard people say "look at those pilots crying about their $300,000 salary outside of Sky Harbor."

It is my opinion, pilots need to resort to tactics that work. Board room tactics. Not renting a blower from Diamond Rental to power a 15' rat with red eyes and claws.

This is a business. We're providing a service that we need to deem the value of through business-style negotiations.
 
And that's the million dollar question. If ALPA was a REAL union you'd have:

1. One comphrehensive pay scale and set of work rules for every unionized airline pilot.

ALPA has studied this idea numerous times, and each committee always comes to the same conclusion: a single pay scale and set of work rules is both completely unworkable and undesirable. There are far too many variables in the operations of each individual airline to be able to assign a single set of workrules, and ALPA's ability to advance wages and work rules is directly tied to the ability to "jack up the house one corner at a time." Captain Behnke set up ALPA the way it is for this specific reason.

2. A national seniority list

You'll never get the majority of pilots to go along with it. Captain Woerth was in favor of this concept, but saw the reality that this would never be possible. The ship sailed for this concept 76 years ago when ALPA was founded. It's impossible to change it now.

the AAA MEC stuck doggedly to their Date of Hire position even though ALPA National advised them to modify their stance.
Small correction: ALPA National never advised the AAA MEC to change their stance on the integration. ALPA maintains a strict policy of neutrality during seniority integrations. It's very likely that the attorney for the AAA MEC advised them to change their stance, but that attorney was not an ALPA lawyer and was selected solely by the AAA MEC.
 
Glad you think so highly of pilots social status.

This isn't about what pilots think of their own social status. This is about what everyone else, especially management, thinks about our status. Your perception of yourself is irrelevant. What matters is how everyone else perceives you.

Guess what? ALPA hasn't done much for anyone lately. Just ask USAir pilots or any other group that has been stomped on. ALPA needs to revise their tactics. Most pilots are ready for a new union.

Actually, if you look at the independent polling results, most pilots hold favorable opinions of their union leadership. You wouldn't know it because of the vocal minority of anti-ALPA zealots, but most pilots don't seek a new union. As for your comment that "ALPA hasn't done much for anyone lately," you should ask the Mesaba pilots about that. They came out of bankruptcy with a contract that is actually worth more than their pre-bankruptcy contract, despite the fact that management had been pushing for some of the most draconian payrates and work rules in recent history. Thanks to ALPA, that didn't happen. All of the concessionary contracts you see would have been far worse had it not been for ALPA. It's easy for you to attack ALPA, but you're just going after the convenient scape-goat. The real culprits are the bankruptcy laws, the RLA, and immoral management.

Picketing outside a major airport doesn't do much for the public. They already think we're overpaid as it is. If I had a $1 for every time I heard people say "look at those pilots crying about their $300,000 salary outside of Sky Harbor."

I don't want their sympathy. I couldn't possibly care less. I want their fear. I want them to be afraid that their next flight on (insert picketing carrier here) is going to be canceled or delayed because of labor unrest. If they take their business elsewhere, then I've achieved some more leverage. Make no mistake about it, the NWA pilots achieved the improvements to their concessionary CBA specifically because of their picketing and "what about BOB" (block or better) campaigns. Negative press for the airline always plays into our hands.

This is a business. We're providing a service that we need to deem the value of through business-style negotiations.

Management will simply not engage you in business-style negotiations because they view you as being inferior and not worth their time. You are scum in their eyes, and they would replace you with a monkey tomorrow if they could. Your idea that you can engage these people on a normal professional level as business associates is naive. No, you have to force them to the table through leverage tactics. Eliminate the picketing, the slowdowns, the strikes, the bad press, etc..., then you have no leverage, and management will not even agree to meet with you. Sorry, that's just the reality.
 
I was tossing around a couple ideas - they call it 'blue-skying' in advertising...and was wondering if any of these ideas would work...none of them are either-or, or mutually exclusive positions....

...take the pilots out of the airlines. That's right. Essentially, form a corporation of...call them aviation consultants. The pilots work for a corporation which is not the airline, paid by the corporation, insured and protected by the corporation. The airlines RENT the pilots from the corporation - sort of like a contract/temp/agency. There are 5,000 things about this scenario that wouldn't work, but collectively, it could wield a pretty big sword, y'know?

...I think a national seniority system could work if it was tied to PAY only - if you have x-number of hours as an ATP, this is what you get paid. Schedule would still be bid based on seniority at a given carrier, but pay would be nationwide across the board...hadn't fleshed that out yet, but it would seem to me that it would be more palatable....I dunno...

just ideas....
 
You are correct, but just try to get a bunch of Republicans to act like blue collar labor. Once when I asked one of our guys if he donated to ALPA-PAC, he said, "I give $200 a year to the NRA." I said, "So, basicly what your saying is keeping an arsenal in your basement is more important to you than your job." "Yep." he said.

Wait a minute. Have we met?
 
A Union is a way for pilots to stand behind each other to fight for fair wages and work rules.

Fight? Fight who? Fight what? This is not a war. There is not a star chamber of eeeevil airline managers hunkered down in some smoke filled room plotting to "stick it to the pilots." Management is just a group of people trying to figure out how to make money by flying people or things on airplanes. Not that they are doing a very good job, mind you, but that is a different story.

The job is what it is. It is not going to go back to something even remotely resembling what it was. Airline pilots are still going to make a good salary, but it is not going to be like it was pre-9/11. The only thing you can do is decide if the rewards are worth the costs. If they are, great! Enjoy your career. If not, well then there are plenty of other ways to make a 6 digit income. But don't fool yourself into thinking that you are somehow going to reverse the past 30 years.
 
Back
Top