737 goes down off Hawaii

[mikecweb]

Company limited, as in a FOM thing (or whatever your company calls it, GOM, etc).

We cannot fly for another airline concurrently with our own, unless on a leave with approval of the CP, largely with the intent to keep 117 flight time preserved for our own shop. I assume the same for you? Cargo carve out, so precious rest rules. But still while you can fly a FedEx MD11, but on your 5 days you wouldn’t fly a 4 day trip for someone like Western Global. And if you quit FedEx (not that you would) to go to Western Global, they’d make you go through their MD11 course and have you re-learn the plane how they want it done/flown.

I have a feeling you know all this, but just trying to be difficult.

The fact that you are unaware that I don't fly under Part 117 makes it apparent you don't have a clue about this industry.

Second if someone asked me to operate their MD11 for them would I have to go-to school? Can you operate a 737-BBJ? If I was asked to ferry an MD11 to Africa would I need to go-to school.

These are all easy questions. Perhaps JetU didn't touch on it.

 

[Cherokee_Cruiser]

The fact that you are unaware that I don't fly under Part 117 makes it apparent you don't have a clue about this industry.

Let’s focus, I just wrote above in your quoted portion there is a cargo careveout, so previous rest rules (precious was a typo, it has been corrected).

Second if someone asked me to operate their MD11 for them would I have to go-to school? Can you operate a 737-BBJ? If I was asked to ferry an MD11 to Africa would I need to go-to school.

These are all easy questions. Perhaps JetU didn't touch on it.

I’d tell anyone to check their company FOM/GOM before doing any outside airline flying for their same jet.

Not gonna argue to argue anymore, have a great night!

 

[Screaming_Emu]

The fact that you are unaware that I don't fly under Part 117 makes it apparent you don't have a clue about this industry.

Second if someone asked me to operate their MD11 for them would I have to go-to school? Can you operate a 737-BBJ? If I was asked to ferry an MD11 to Africa would I need to go-to school.

These are all easy questions. Perhaps JetU didn't touch on it.

You don’t operate under 117 because you’re a cargo pilot, therefore you are a superior human specimen who is incapable of fatigue.

 

[SteveC]

I have a question for you…can you legally fly a 737 “Classic” without differences training?

…
Not gonna argue to argue anymore, have a great night!

Does that mean you aren’t going to answer my question?

 

[DPApilot]

Let’s focus, I just wrote above in your quoted portion there is a cargo careveout, so previous rest rules (precious was a typo, it has been corrected).




I’d tell anyone to check their company FOM/GOM before doing any outside airline flying for their same jet.

Not gonna argue to argue anymore, have a great night!

You really are this clueless. You realize there a lot of airplanes that fly part 91, right? Did you know that my Bus type extended the validity of my Falcon 2000 currency by another year from the 12 month period of my last recurrent on it?
If my CP said I could do whatever and someone called me to fly an ACJ, I could do it with no training if it was part 91.

 

[Autothrust Blue]

Admittedly I’m not sure if the FSB report requirements apply to purely Part 91 operations

*awkward shuffle*

 

[mikecweb]

Not gonna argue to argue anymore, have a great night!

That's 89% of what you post.

 

[DropTank]

Type Rating: "You can fly all of the airplanes listed under this type certificate!!"

Insurance: "No... No you can't"

Owners: "What the insurance guy says."

 

[Maximilian_Jenius]

Have they said how deep it is? I can’t imagine that it’s that deep where they went down, then again I know very little about anything.

What you know about rollin' down in the deep?
I feel like an astronaut in the ocean, ayy, ayy

 

[Autothrust Blue]

Type Rating: "You can fly all of the airplanes listed under this type certificate!!"

Insurance: "No... No you can't"

Owners: "What the insurance guy says."

And off you go to ICT or wherever to collect another large blue bag!

 

[Kingairer]

Can we please move on? CC didn’t know his 737 type could, in theory, allow him to fly a 737-200 (realizing that situation is purely hypothetical and would never present itself). He slept in on that day at JetU.

 

[bLizZuE]

I feel like Captain America at the end of End Game.

 

[Cherokee_Cruiser]

Does that mean you aren’t going to answer my question?

Sorry
Legal - yes
Smart - no

If you get off on not knowing I could legally fly the Classics, hey more power to ya. But to tell you how my mindset is:

It’s perfectly legal for me to take a Piper Archer do 3 full stop landings staying in the pattern, and then take my wife and kids in that same plane and fly Torrance, CA to Torrance, PA. Legal? Yes. But I’d be a dumbass to do that. I haven’t flown a GA plane in 10 yrs now.

So you people can argue all the semantics you want, and be all the heroes you want. Bottom line, if an opportunity presented itself for me to re-po a 737-200 for a friend under Part 91 rules, I’d refuse. I’m humble enough to admit this is beyond my level of what I’d feel comfortable with, and instead suggest someone like MikeD fly it.

I make too much money to jeopardize safety over a technicality (well you’re legal!). To conclude:

1. If my conpany re-introduced the Classics, they would give us differences training for it before flying it.

2. If an opportunity presented itself where I had to and fly Classics, I’d be humble enough to realize this is still something different than what I’m used to, and seek a differences course designed for NG to Classics.


Quick, some email Pan Am and tell them those three are the same type ratings:

I bet you if I called up a place like that, told them I fly the NG and just want a differences to go fly a -200, they’d gladly tailor up a quick course for differences (going the other way) NG to Classic.

Lastly, if I flew a classic under 91 and dicked it up and died, I highly doubt the JC crowd would defend me and say we’ll he was legally qualified! There’d be pages of “what a dumb idiot” for flying that round dial plane with 0 time on round dial jets.


Clear as mud? No? Well that’s the best you’re getting.
Moving on now to the Trans Air accident…

 

[Richman]

unrestricted here

727, 757, 767, R—22 unrestricted. DC-9 VFR circle.

I am English proficient, however.

 

[ASpilot2be]

What you know about rollin' down in the deep?
I feel like an astronaut in the ocean, ayy, ayy

 

[Minuteman]

When you learn to fly this…

But you can also fly this…

And this…

And this…

Legally, all single pilot, with some engines with fadec and some without under the same type rating…ya might have a problem.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Importantly, they retained the dual cupholders on each side throughout every revision.

 

[pwttogfk]

Importantly, they retained the dual cupholders on each side throughout every revision.

Until Elliott put Bose plugs right above our map light switch. Is Bluetooth worth not having a water and coffee at the same time? Jury’s still out.
But yeah, the 4 should not be a 525S type and the argument could be made for doing something like Falcon for a separate type for the G3000 airplanes. Did my initial in the M2 and mainly flew that with a little bit of 3+ for a few years before switching to the legacy CJ3. Better pay, better schedule, and I want to punch the PL21 every time I think of G3000.

 

[NovemberEcho]

ive been jamming to that on Sirius

 

[fholbert]

I just changed my signature.

 

[jose1337]

Not good: Air cargo company that ditched plane off Hawaii is grounded