BCTAv8r said:
Does it matter which degree you get? If two people had the same package for the ANG for example, except that one has a music degree with a 3.9 and another has a mechanical engineering degree with a 3.2, which one is more likely to get the spot?
Its not really fair to base it all in GPA. Some degrees are way harder than the others which usually accounts for lower GPAs.
And yes, I know life ain't fair. I just want to know if they prefer technical degrees.
With a tech degree, you can get a tech slot, which is almost an assured commission due to the lack of engineers and other technical positions filled within the AF (physicists, etc).
You can get a tech slot and then, depending on your age, apply again for UPT. You can get OPRs and good recommendations from your commander. I've known a few who have crossed over from tech slots to rated slots. The key nowadays is to get your foot in the door.
As I have said before, if you are serious about trying to get a pilot slot, go after ROTC. No matter what year you are in in school, go talk to the local ROTC detachment. Maybe you can spend an extra two years and get a double degree and go into the service with a guaranteed commission if that is what you really want to do. OTS is all based on the number of slots not filled by the Academy or ROTC.
So, in answer to your question, a 3.2 mechanical engineer would be more favorable than a 3.9 in music. The music major is competing at large for a non-tech slot, while the ME is competing amongst a much smaller set for the unfillable tech slots, for which the music major is ineligible. (Tech slots are for engineering and physics majors.)
So, for a flying slot, they are considered equal. For technical slot, there's no comparison.
Then, the question becomes, do you take the tech slot and try to apply for UPT after being in the service, or do you only apply for the flying slot?