jtrain609
Antisocial Monster
I didn't say CFI. I said "pilot."![]()
Even better, know any?
I didn't say CFI. I said "pilot."![]()
Even better, know any?
Well, I guess I consider flying up and down Daytona Beach an extension of the pattern. Under those conditions, then yes. But you know what I was getting at. How about "Just done pattern work and been in the practice area or never gone more than 60 nm from their home airport?"
Two crossfeed switchlights instead of one; mass hysteria?Except for the crossfeed.![]()
Two crossfeed switchlights instead of one; mass hysteria?
Baby's first jet was very idiot proof, and yet we built better idiots.Well, the only other jet time I have beyond the 757/767 is the ERJ with the "Low 1/2" switch. That was idiot proof, and you couldn't flame out a motor by pressing stuff in the wrong order.![]()
Brian Lausmann said:So they're saying that if I fly a cub for 1500 hours, I qualify to fly a 777?
So they're saying that if I fly a cub for 1500 hours, I qualify to fly a 777?
Not as much fiction as you'd think. I know two guys, both independent CFIs at ORL, that haven't been further than EYW, and that was because that's where the student wanted to go on a long cross country. They're pretty much home bodies that have no desire to go further than they are now.
Not really. Remember for each rating or job there are certain requirements. So if you want to get your high performance sign off or multi engine rating, I'm pretty sure you have to fly one. Chances are also pretty good if you're applying for a regional they'll want you to have those things and a lot more. So while yes you can gain 1500hrs of flight time in a cub, some of it can't be applied towards ratings like the ATP. Kinda like jtrain mentioned, things like that don't really exist in the real world.So they're saying that if I fly a cub for 1500 hours, I qualify to fly a 777?
If you think that'll stop PFT/PFJ, I have a bridge to sell you. See: Riddle carve out.
I was being facetious. The subjective issue of experience gets ushered to the front of the line and the increased rest takes years to enact.
I fully support having to get an ATP, but the rest rules should be priority #1.
I think a guy with 1500 hours in a cub is infinitely more experienced than I was at 250 hours on my commercial checkride.
Ah- pardon my kneejerk. I've explained these concepts to so many captains lately that don't think anything will change at all that they can't see the system changing right in front of them.
I forget the statistics, but aren't each of us most dangerous between zero to five hundred in type?In cubs, yes.
Sent from 1865 by telegraph....