Search results

I hope so as well on your behalf. Just think if we were Socialist it would be $4/box!

I find this debate hilarious. Guns are not going anywhere. Prices will though, low cost, bulk items (ammunition, high capacity magazines, AR Lowers, etc.) become short in supply thus show a price increase on open markets. Collector items show a decrease, and a good time to buy a liquid asset...

Back at the DZ: "You called door too early and were five degrees off run"

550: Planeview, more range (+250nm), same engines with more thrust, higher max TOW.

I am kind of curious how the FAA plans to enforce against the rouge 'for hire' operator who are not in compliance with a 333 exemption. This is more cut and dry and now becomes an enforcement issue. There may be a 'right of privacy' (in a broader context) but maybe not expectation of privacy...

No worries - it is an interesting point of discussion.

Thanks for sharing. They have since edited/deleted their comments on of all things - instagram - about how they were requiring 1,500 hours (Part 135 mins, which even then is not accurate), but never answering the questions people had about whether or not that had a 119 cert to employ pilots on...

You should work on your analogies and colloquial terms then, quite confusing in an industry where certain words mean very different things. :) As overstepping/overreach is concerned, we all had our time to comment on the NPRM period and discuss it with congress.

"Operator" gives me impression you are speaking of commercial operations, which is different from being a hobbyist. You can still use UAs for capturing photos for personal use, though yes, you cannot control UAs outside of line-of-sight without normal vision.

Re-read: You are arguing the FAA can't while admitting they just did based on the analogy that it is not legal to race [UA] between trees.