The Student Being The Customer... discuss

Both are calculators. One requires a battery, the other doesn't. If you really wanted to make your student to learn what's going on then why not give them a piece of paper and a pencil and that's it!

I see both sides to this debate. Personally, I think you should learn how to use both and pick the one that is most comfortable to use on a daily basis.

If I had a student flat-out refused to learn the wheel I might send him elsewhere, depending on how much I needed the work. Got to keep the food on the table.
 
Take cross-wind landings, for example.

To make a good, non-skidding x/wind landing, you need to be able to hold the upwind wing into the wind precisely enough to counter the x/wind drift and precisely enough opposite rudder to offset the turning tendency due to the bank, and land on the one upwind wheel, precisely holding off the downwind wheel and landing it smoothly as speed is dissipated and finally landing the nosewheel as speed is further dissipated. One, two,..and three, like that.

But, a student can crab down final, kick it straight at the last moment and skid into a slightly crabbing touch-down that looks and feels..well, pretty good to the uninitiated... to the student/private/fresh commercial pilot who has never been required to 'three point' in a severe cross-wind, he thinks he's pretty good and does not see the need to become really proficient at slipping down final.

This is a perfectly acceptable method of landing. "Crab and Kick." It is one of the age old debates in aviation, but as long as they both achieve the objective of keeping the longitudinal axis aligned with the runway with rudder while you correct with wind drift with the aileron, what's the big deal?
 
... crab down final, kick it straight at the last moment and skid into a slightly crabbing touch-down that looks and feels..well, pretty good to the uninitiated... to the student/private/fresh commercial pilot who has never been required to 'three point' in a severe cross-wind, he thinks he's pretty good and does not see the need to become really proficient at slipping down final.

Funny...

That is how we land the CRJ in a crosswind...

Hold in the crab until we start our "flare", then straighten her up on the centerline.
 
as long as they both achieve the objective of keeping the longitudinal axis aligned with the runway with rudder while you correct with wind drift with the aileron, what's the big deal?
But you're not. See? You think you are keeping it aligned, because the wind isn't strong enough for you to develop a strong drift during the 'kick and crab' maneuver, or you have not experienced a true non-drift, non-skidding touchdown to campare it to.

Now - - maybe you personally are. If you are, then more power to you, and you can do as you please. You have it.

But most are not, and most will accept a less than stellar performance and are not aware of the potential danger.

The same thinking is in the demand of an E6B. I am not saying that everyone must use the E6B, but I am saying there are things your instructor will want that you may not agree with, and if he is a professional, it is for your good, and not to pad his time. Professionals don't do that. There is a solid reason behind every thing he tries to teach you.

The problem is that most of today's instructors are new, inexperienced, and only able to copy what their instructor did without knowing why, and they are trying to pad their logbook with time.

And this opens the door for students to question the instructor and the instructor is trying to be a nice guy and so on and on.....the quality of training continues to decline with each new toy.

It's history, man; each civilization falls as technology increases.
 
The problem is that most of today's instructors are new, inexperienced, and only able to copy what their instructor did without knowing why

And the old ones haven't learned anything new in about 30 years, are still repeating by rote what they were taught as student pilots, and tend to be pretty grumpy. To top it all off, their students don't seem consistently any more skilled than those taught by a 300-hour CFI from a diploma mill.

Honestly, we ought to just shut down the flight instructing industry, since we all suck. :D
 
Its happened a couple times. Usually the Indian students stay up all night chatting on the internet to their friends in India.


I liked it when they stayed up all night watcing cricket. I gave out 3 no shows when India played Pakistan!:) I always told them "to start preparing to act professional now so you don't get fired for doing this crap when you get in the real world."
 
Of course, this whole concept is based on the instructor does have the experience and judgement that you expect of an instructor. You give him control of your learning environment and expect that his professional judgement is best. Do as he says.

I guess I've had crappy instructors, then, because none of them gave a crap. I forwarded a copy of this thread to one of them and he wrote back and said tell them I said...well, I can't repeat exactly what he said.

He's a gold seal instructor, too.

They wanted me to know how to calculate a wind correction angle or density altitude. They didn't care what tool I used to do it.
 
All I have to say is the whiz wheel is forgotten with disuse. Electronic E6B is just turn it on, select option, input numbers.
 
But you're not. See? You think you are keeping it aligned, because the wind isn't strong enough for you to develop a strong drift during the 'kick and crab' maneuver, or you have not experienced a true non-drift, non-skidding touchdown to campare it to.

Now - - maybe you personally are. If you are, then more power to you, and you can do as you please. You have it.

But most are not, and most will accept a less than stellar performance and are not aware of the potential danger.


I have about 1300 hours of dual given and have had to "fix" some full time students with 60+ hours before their solo(not my original students), so I have seen landings as screwed up as you can imagine.

How do you know most are not keeping the airplane aligned with the runway? Seriously, how is that possible?

Here are some opinions from some AOPA guys:

http://www.aopa.org/training/articles/2008/080417crosswind.html

As I said before, it is heavily debated, but either method is fine and either one can achieve the objective. Maybe we are talking about something different.
 
But you're not. See? You think you are keeping it aligned, because the wind isn't strong enough for you to develop a strong drift during the 'kick and crab' maneuver, or you have not experienced a true non-drift, non-skidding touchdown to campare it to.

Now - - maybe you personally are. If you are, then more power to you, and you can do as you please. You have it.

But most are not, and most will accept a less than stellar performance and are not aware of the potential danger.

Just curious here...how much wind are we talking about here? 10 kts? 20 kts?

For me personally, why would I want to wear myself out slipping the airplane the entire time I am on final when I can crab into the wind and let the airplane basically fly itself. It is a technique, not a hard rule that you can't "crab and kick". Some pilots prefer it to slipping down final.
 
I guess I've had crappy instructors, then, because none of them gave a crap. I forwarded a copy of this thread to one of them and he wrote back and said tell them I said...well, I can't repeat exactly what he said.

He's a gold seal instructor, too.

They wanted me to know how to calculate a wind correction angle or density altitude. They didn't care what tool I used to do it.

Impressive. So am I. But hey man, you seem to be one of the types to argue just to hear yourself talk. So have fun with that.
 
But you're not. See? You think you are keeping it aligned, because the wind isn't strong enough for you to develop a strong drift during the 'kick and crab' maneuver, or you have not experienced a true non-drift, non-skidding touchdown to campare it to.

Could you explain what you mean by this? I'm honestly confused. Are you saying it is impossible to "crab & kick" with no lateral movement while keeping the nose aligned in a stiff crosswind?

I don't think that's what you meant to say, but that's how it reads.
 
It is a technique, not a hard rule that you can't "crab and kick". Some pilots prefer it to slipping down final.

Either method will fulfill the requirements of the PTS.

And that's what counts.

I can't believe people are arguing over what tool you use to accomplish a job. Who cares? The job needs to get done. Get it done with an abacus if you want to, just as long as it gets done properly.
 
Either method will fulfill the requirements of the PTS.

And that's what counts.
Tony I have to disagree with you on one point.

Merely meeting the requirements of the PTS is a D- grade. You passed, at the bare minimum requirement, but that is it. I have met and flown with WAY too many pilots and instructors that were trained just to pass the checkride.

I have way too many instrument students that are not meeting private pilot PTS standards for things like holding a heading, altitude, runway centerline, adjust for a crosswind, etc.... It isn't that they are just having a bad day, they consistently just don't know how to do it. They were sent to a checkride knowing just enough to pass.

I have had other instructors I work with ask me for a "profile" for a specific examiner and I had to have them explain to me what that was and I was horrified to find out that that is how some big schools teach.

Bare minimum does not cut it for me.
 
I once fired 7 students in one month because they wanted to use headsets.

I told them HAND MIKE, OR BUST!

A real airman uses the handmike, not some failure-prone piece of girlygoo.
 
Could you explain what you mean by this? I'm honestly confused. Are you saying it is impossible to "crab & kick" with no lateral movement while keeping the nose aligned in a stiff crosswind?

I don't think that's what you meant to say, but that's how it reads.

Yes, that's what I meant to say. Except I didn't say it is "impossible".

It is "very very difficult" for a beginning student to master this "transistion from a crab to a slip during fare".

If you actually transition into a slip and land on the upwind wheel first, followed by the downwind wheel the same as if you slipped all the way down final, then you will not develop a drift during the flare.

This maneuver takes more skill, timing, and judgement than simply holding a slip all the way down final.

A beginning student will develop the skill of a 3 point x-wind touchdown by slipping down final. he needs the 'time' holding the slip to get the feel so that he can advance to the 'transition to slip' during the flare.

My comment is based on thousands and thousands of hours teaching primary in tailwheel and nosewheel and most noswheel pilots cannot even tell that they are landing with a little side drift even with no x-wind.

Most pilots who use the "Kick and crab" method only staighten up the nose at the last moment before touchdown so that there is very little side drift. As I have read on some of the replies, this is little bit of side drift is acceptable to them.

That's because they are nosewheel pilots and do not even recognize a slight side-drift on touchdown.

As to the poster who coments, "If it is within PTS, it is acceptable", I feel very strongly that any person who lives with that low standard should not be in this community.

However, if you look at the PTS, one of the standards of every landing is "On centerline with no side-drift".

The DE's just don't enforce it. That does not make it acceptable.

And I'm not talking about RJ's, or bigger airplanes, guys, I'm talking primary students learning a basic skill in a light airplane. You cannot kick it straight without some drift unless you also coordinate the slip.

And I started this thing about slipping vs. crabbing just as an example of "Lost skill" because we have accepted a lower standard. That's the issue of this thread - accepting a lower standard by having tools that do the work for us.

We have accepted this lower standard because we could, with the nosewheel airplane. You can allow a slightly side drifting touch-down. You could not 'kick & crab' a tailwheel, not unless you were damn good and learned the precise skill of slipping by doing it all the way down a long final.
 
Okay - that clears it up and I understand what you mean. Thanks for the explanation.
 
Merely meeting the requirements of the PTS is a D- grade. You passed, at the bare minimum requirement, but that is it. I have met and flown with WAY too many pilots and instructors that were trained just to pass the checkride.

You're right. The PTS is the bare minimum. Seriously, if someone could only fly to the bare minimums the PTS requires, I'd say they're a pretty crappy pilot!

But, if the question is about the technique used to accomplish a job versus the performance of the job, then that's when I say, come on!

Use the tool which works best for you. Make sure you do it well, but do it with whatever tool you want to.
 
I once fired 7 students in one month because they wanted to use headsets.

I told them HAND MIKE, OR BUST!

A real airman uses the handmike, not some failure-prone piece of girlygoo.


LMAO!!!!!! You my man mtsu except when your making me look like an ###:)
 
Back
Top