Skywest has already been given this replacement flying.
Source, or is this more pure, wild speculation? If it's from the crew room, it doesn't count, BTW....
surreal said:
I always wondered this. . .and I suppose I could find it. . .but where exactly is this -900 going?
Who knows? There currently isn't any other flying. Best I can think is begging NWA to use their 1-for-1 clause to replace 16 -200s with -900s. In the end, that's not gonna help the potential furloughs and displacements.
blee said:
Can Delta do this? They signed a contract, we havent violated any terms of agreement, have we? Can they just cancel an ASA whenever they feel like? Its not like they have BK protection anymore. it will be interesting.
According to Delta, we DID violate terms of the contract. They state the reason they're canceling is b/c of poor on-time arrival performance. Now, my question is who draws up the schedules? From the way I understand it, Delta makes the schedule, hands it to PNCL and says "Make it work with airplanes and flying." Now, if they hand us an unrealistic schedule, then there's not much we can do. From the press release, it sounds like that's what was happening, and Pinnacle management voiced their concerns over it. If that is indeed true, I'd say we've got a good shot at winning in court. Same holds true with Mesa and Delta canceling their flights, then crying foul over poor completion factor. If this is Delta's way of shedding long term regional contracts, it's pretty damn unethical. Now, if we said "Yes, Delta. We can do it, Delta. Whatever you say, Delta" KNOWING that the schedules were unrealistic, not only are we gonna lose the Delta flying, but we should be losing our upper management team that agreed to all of that.
blee said:
Because of our ASA with NW, they cant fly into our hubs. I think thats pretty standard in the industry. The -900s are based in ATL and they fly to Houston (dont know if its IAH or Hobby), St Croix, a couple others. Kellwolf might be able to fill you in on the rest.
Yeah, and they had JUST given us ATL-NAS, too. Go figure. They were adding new destinations right up to the point they said, "BTW, you're outta Delta Connection on July 31st." We CAN do ATL-MEM in the -900. NWA gave us a waiver so we could get the -900 to and from MEM for MX, at least that's my understanding. We fly into IAH for NWA and HOU from ATL. As for everything else, I'm just as in the dark as everyone else is. I'd like to hear some straight talk and info from our management, but I haven't heard jack yet.
h46bubba said:
Per the shedule bulletin from last Friday, there are no PNCL -900 lines after July 31st.
Any increase in Comair, Skywest or Freedom flying the -900s or are they just letting the routes drop? I kinda have a feeling things like ATL-RIC and ATL-HOU probably weren't doing too well anyway.
h46bubba said:
I think another reason for Delta terminating the contract with PNCL is because of the stike vote and the labor issues. Delta learned their lesson back in 01 when Comair struck and Delta lost millions in revenue. They know they can't get another ALPA or union carrier to fly struck work.
That issue could be resolved QUICKLY, though. I'd almost rather them be dropping us for that instead of some performance issues. Honestly, I don't think we had the flying long enough to establish a baseline performance anyway, and I'd hope that gets argued in the inevitable court battle. If it's b/c we don't have a contract, that can be taken care of in a matter of a week or so. All they gotta do is sign on the dotted line.