USAir Pilot To Be Fired For Handgun Going Off

Re: Don't stow your GAT on approach

Well, that's at least ONE career death due to this whole gun in the cockpit bit.

Nevertheless, it shouldn't have ever been out in the first place.

Bummer.

Where's ALP....err...uSAPa to provide legal protection / job security?

(HAH!)
 
Re: USairways FDO Fired?

The stowing/locking procedure is in my opinion conducive to this type of accidental discharge. There are no types of law enforcement personnel or even security guards who carry a firearm that follows this type of inane stowing procedures for their weapons -- it has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with politics.

This is all just my humble opinion though. That said he did make a few serious mistakes.
 
Re: Don't stow your GAT on approach

I have three HK USP variants, all in .40 S&W

They DO NOT go off unintentionally

The safety lever not only blocks the trigger from being pulled, it also blocks the hammer from striking the firing pin.

In DA mode the pull on the trigger is 14 pounds (i think) to cock the hammer then release. You have to pull for what feels like a mile. DA mode WILL NOT cock the hammer if the safety is engaged. You can manually cock the hammer with your thumb, but then you are in SA mode.

In SA mode you have to have the safety off, the hammer cocked, and the trigger pulled to fire a round. Trigger pull in SA mode is around 6 pounds.

You have to try really hard to fire a round with this pistol.
 
I thought the guns were/are supposed to be stowed for the entire flight (unless needed)? if that really is the case, then he overstepped his bounds of being an FSDO and should be punished. Not sure termination is the right punishment though... they could just take him off the FSDO program and let him continue to fly.

I think the reason they might be terminating him is because "someone *could* have gotten killed tho and that's all that matters isn't it?"
 
Kristie said:
I thought the guns were/are supposed to be stowed for the entire flight (unless needed)? if that really is the case, then he overstepped his bounds of being an FSDO and should be punished. Not sure termination is the right punishment though... they could just take him off the FSDO program and let him continue to fly.

I think the reason they might be terminating him is because "someone *could* have gotten killed tho and that's all that matters isn't it?"
Click to expand...

I think its due to the fact he had the gun out during flight when it should have been stowed.
 
Re: USairways FDO Fired?

SpiraMirabilis said:
The stowing/locking procedure is in my opinion conducive to this type of accidental discharge. There are no types of law enforcement personnel or even security guards who carry a firearm that follows this type of inane stowing procedures for their weapons -- it has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with politics.

This is all just my humble opinion though. That said he did make a few serious mistakes.
Click to expand...

From the video's i've seen it looks fairly plausible that a unintentional discharge may have happened.

You would figure a quick review of the cockpit tapes would prove whether or not he was horsing around with the pistol or just securing/locking it up before landing.

If the TSA procedures are unsafe then they need to be changed but if he was really just playing with the gun then he needs to be fired.
 
SeanD said:
I think its due to the fact he had the gun out during flight when it should have been stowed.
Click to expand...

That's incorrect. The gun is not required to be stowed during flight. The real problem here is the locking holster. It needs to be eliminated and the FFDOs allowed to carry on their person at all times. If that was the case, then this never would have happened.
 
Re: USairways FDO Fired?

PCL_128 said:
Better call his ALPA rep.......oops, nevermind. I would say call uSAPa, but they probably can't afford phones yet. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

That is really unfortunate. This guy needs real representation to save his job and its gone...
 
Has anybody considered the possibility that this guy was a USAPA guy or an ex ALPA guy or something like that?

ie- maybe this was just an all too convenient excuse?

It really wouldn't surprise me.

That's all I'm gonna say- cause.. the rest has really already been said.
 
It's a really bad idea to be discharging your weapon during a flight. Yeah, yeah, hello, Captain Obvious.

I can see why he got canned. I usually don't come down on the side of the employer but in this case, I can see why they did it.
 
surreal1221 said:
Where's ALP....err...uSAPa to provide legal protection / job security?
Click to expand...

777forever said:
That is really unfortunate. This guy needs real representation to save his job and its gone...
Click to expand...

I'm just curious as to why people think he should be allowed to keep his job. I'm a supporter of armed cockpits but this sort of thing is indefensible and certainly inexcusable. In my 25+ years of owning firearms I had one accidentally discharge once....and it was my fault.

Champcar said:
He should be held accountable for his actions.
Click to expand...
Seconded! Hold him accountable right out the door.
 
I definitely agree with the employer here because, although it was an unfortunate accident, he should have "exercised extreme caution" when putting the gun back into the case. We've all heard that one before. Either way, by the sounds of it, it was his fault but I was not in the cockpit to witness it.

My real question is that I know people have been saying it shouldn't be out in the cockpit and blah blah... But I have heard from a few people he is in some sort of "Flight deck arms program"?? (I know that's not the name, but you get the idea) Anyways, it says that he is required to take the gun out of the case, and holster it during flight. He is only required to unlock the case and holster the gun at the beginning of the flight, and then must put the gun back in the locked case before landing. Even if the pilot has to leave the flight deck for whatever reason, he/she must put the gun back into the locked case and the other pilot must not even know the combination. That is what I heard, can anyone back me up on this info??
 
Lets put this into perspective...... This man was accidentally placing his weapon somehwere else while on final. He is allowed to carry the weapon and therefore help the company out by doing so. If he were a police officer should he be fired for his weapon being fired accidentally? If he were an FBI agent and his weapon went off should they be fired? Lets change this to more typical careers, if he's a doctor and one accident perhaps makes a little too far of a cut on a person that requires more stiches should they be fired? The fact of the matter is you are all hypocrites if you say you have never made a mistake. Thefore calling for this mans head is out of control. If you dare say you are perfect and have never made a mistake I have a man I want you to meet when I pass away pretty far up in the skies..... He who hasnt made a mistake feel free to cast a stone but seriously guys...... You all sound like a bunch of hungry dogs who havent been fed and a piece of meat jsut fell infront of your faces....... This is a mans live, career, etc etc etc and you all have no compassion at all!
 
meyers9163 said:
Lets put this into perspective......
Click to expand...

Indeed - let's compare it to the US Military. In the Army there is no such thing as an "accidental discharge." It is a "negligent" discharge because allowing a weapon to to fire implies the operator was negligent in their duties. The reason for the distinction should be obvious; the severity of the consequences can be great if someone allows a firearm to discharge unintentionally. I personally know of a former soldier who has only one leg because his buddy "accidentally" allowed a machine gun to fire. Imagine if the other pilot had been hit in this case. What would the consequences have been then? Then think that the only reason the bullet didn't hurt/kill anyone was because of blind luck.

Through training and very routine discussions on the subject, negligent discharges can nearly be eliminated. One thing the airlines might consider is to emplace a written policy detailing the punishment if a negligent discharge occurs. That would remove ambiguity and would possibly encourage an extra bit of safety from the FFDOs. In the Army a soldier knows exactly what will happen to them if they have a negligent discharge. There is no surprises and no debate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top