Tailwheel PIC

personally, i'm here to not only share my two-decades of knowledge/experience, fifteen of which are professional aviation, but also to be open-minded to learning new things. aviation contains a monstrous amount of aeronautical knowledge and regulatory material, so much so that's virtually impossible to memorize or fully understand it all. we do our best to try..that's a professional approach. for fifteen years i've approached and logged dual per my understanding that a rated-pilot could not log any pic time at all until completely endorsed. mark convinced me to take a closer look at it and i've decided that i agree with his reading of the reg. in the long run does it count for much? no..but i agree it's legal and i'm fine with that. i'm not concerned that this is going to endanger the tailwheel student. he'll get my endorsement to ACT as pic after i sign off. until then, if he may log a negligible amount of pic time during sole manipulator operation, that's fine. only i may give them solo 'privileges' or a complete endorsement. it isn't a loophole, it just takes a little more in depth reading of the reg to see. that's all. thanks for helping me with it, mark.
 
it isn't a loophole, it just takes a little more in depth reading of the reg to see. that's all. thanks for helping me with it, mark.
You are welcome. I kept alluding to the length of time this has been a non-issue without realizing that you had not been exposed to the issue before. So, for your reference, here is the text of what may be the great-grandfather of FAA Legal opinions on the subject of 61.51 (you'll notice that some of the numbering within the FAR has changed):

==============================
OCT. 28, 1980

WINSTON SCOTT JONES

Dear Mr. Jones:

This is in response to your letter in which you request an interpretation of Section 61.51(2)(c) of the Federal Aviation Regulations, regarding logging of pilot-in-command (PIC) flight time.

Specifically, you ask what time may be logged as PIC time when the pilot in the right seat is a certificated flight instructor (CFI) along for the purpose of instruction and is not a required crewmember, and the pilot in the left seat holds either a private or commercial certificate in an aircraft for which he is rated.

Section 61.51 is a flight-time logging regulation, under which PIC time may be logged by one who is not actually the pilot in command (i.e., not "ultimately" responsible for the aircraft) during that time. This is consistent with the purpose of Section 61.51, which as stated in 61.51(a) is to record aeronautical training and experience used to meet the requirements for a certificate or rating, or the recent flight experience requirements of Section 61.

Section 61.51(c)(2)(i) provides that a private or commercial pilot may log as pilot-in-command time only that flight time during which the pilot--

1. Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which he is rated; or

2. Is the sole occupant of the aircraft; or

3. Acts as pilot-in-command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft, or the regulations under which the flight is conducted.

Under Section 61.51(c)(2)(iii) a certificated flight instructor may log as pilot-in-command time all flight time during which he or she acts as a flight instructor. Sections 61.51(b)(2)(iii) and (iv) provide for logging of flight instruction and instrument flight instruction received.

Accordingly, two or more pilots may each log PIC time for the same flight time. For example, a pilot who is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which he or she is rated may log that time as PIC time under 61.51(c)(2)(i) while receiving instruction, and the instructor may log that same time as PIC time under 61.51(c)(2)(iii).

There is no provision in the FAR's for logging of "dual" flight time; however, we assume that you are referring to logging time as instruction received. Section 61.51(b)(2)(iii) and (iv) allow flight instruction and instrument instruction received time to be recorded. There is nothing in the FAR's which prevents a pilot from logging the same time as both instruction received and PIC time, as long as each requirement is met. The pilot may also log the same time as instrument instruction. Note, though, that one hour of flight logged both as one hour of PIC and one hour of instruction received still adds up to only one hour total flight time.

You request interpretations of these regulations for situations in which:

1. The purpose of the flight is instruction in advanced maneuvers.

2. The purpose of the flight is simulated instrument instruction in actual VFR conditions.

3. The purpose of the flight is instrument instruction actual IFR conditions.

4. The pilot in the left seat is not current in the aircraft or in the conditions of flight.

5. The purpose of the flight is transition from tricycle to conventional landing gear.

6. The purpose of the flight is obtaining logbook endorsement authorizing operation of a high performance aircraft, as required by FAR 61.31(e).

7. The purpose of the flight is transition to a different type aircraft of the same category and class for which the left seat pilot is rated and a type rating is not required.

In each situation, the CFI may log PIC time for all flight time during which she or he acts as flight instructor. The pilot receiving instruction may also log PIC time in each of these situations, as the pilot is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which she or he is rated. Specifically, neither the currency requirements of situation 4 nor the log book endorsement of situation 6 are ratings within the meaning of Section 61.51. "Rating" as used in that section refers to the rating in categories, classes, and types, as listed in Section 61.5, which are placed on pilot certificates.

We trust that this discussion answers your questions.

Sincerely,

EDWARD P. FABERMAN
Acting Assistant Chief Counsel
Regulations and Enforcement Division
==============================
 
You are welcome. I kept alluding to the length of time this has been a non-issue without realizing that you had not been exposed to the issue before.

thanks for posting this, mark. you're right- i'd never been exposed to it before and without that prior awareness likely would never have made the connection. great forum. :bandit:
 
[off-topic]
Mark,

Where can I find those letters of interp, preferably on a .gov website? I'm working through some issues on 135 "rest" regs, and most all of my back-up info is coming from sites like ALPA. The company might be more "receptive" to some "official" info.

[/o-t]
 
BTW, on the interpretation site, the search capability it doesn't work with firefox.

Also be aware of the limitations. I think the interpretations on the FAA Legal site only go back to the early 90's.
 
Where does it say the pilot has to be able to "keep it aligned with the runway" to log PIC?
...um..the regulation, the part that says "sole manipultor". I'm speaking of the rated pilot who is checking out or brushing up who needs help on the controls.
I know of some pilots who can't keep a C152 aligned with the runway, should they not be able to log PIC?
Right. They also should not be allowed to log PIC when the instructor has to help with control inputs. That's what the regulation says. "sole manipulator".

Again, you seem to be under the impression that only a CFI can determine who can log PIC and who can't. The regs say nothing of the kind. All the regs say is that if you are rated in category/class and are sole manipulator, you can log PIC.
...um..well, yes, that's what I've been saying; when he is the sole manipulator, he can log it PIC. I think any NTSB Judge will back me up on who is legally responsible in determining when the pilot receiving instruction is the sole manipultor.
"Sole manipulator" is only meant to prohibit two private pilots from trying to both log PIC by claiming they are sharing the controls. It's not meant to prohibit students from not logging when their instructor is instructing to them.
Well, that is certainly one reason for it, but the "only" part is your own definition. Or have you some reference to that?


If thats the case, then logging PIC while under instruction is impossible, because you're almost always "constantly having to tell the student every little thing".
Not when he is doing more-or-less what he should be doing.


...so you're saying students can't log PIC when the auto pilot is on? I doubt you'll find anyone who agrees with you on that.
No. I was using that as an example of how a pilot CAN log PIC, because he is causing the autopilot to manipulate the controls. That was an attempt to justify my assertion that when the instructor has to cause or influence the student to make control inputs, the instructor is helping him, and so the student is not the sole manipulator.

We aren't doing a very good job of "leading" if we can't even properly read the regulations. By "we" I man you, of course.
We are all trying our best. That includes you.
 
What I have loved about teaching in a Super Cub, is that it is a great equalizer. Doesn't matter if you flew F-15's, 737's, 172's, or the Shuttle, everyone becomes a newbie all over again. And you meet great people doing it. Some are extremely cocky and make numerous excuses on why things didn't work right, or why they should be allowed to land "crabbed"..... But all are soon humbled and pretty much see it our way in the end. And all become much better pilots (stick and rudder anyway). The great humbler. Anyway, I love the the nostalgia and to some extent the difficulty of teaching in it (never boring, I promise you).

I only log dual in their book and put my comments and signature in it. It is up to them to finish it and it is their log book. They are allowed to log PIC and they are perfectly capable of doing it. I leave it to them. Did I when I was first learning? No. But that was my decision and the mindset of my school (old school mentality are we) and of me.

Most pilots could care less and most that do, rarely venture into our realm anyway. Usually when they do, it is after they have a career in the air and don't need the PIC anyway. So " it pays me no nevermind ".

They just don't get an endorsement from us until they prove to us that they can do it safely. Usually about 8 lessons and anywhere from 8 to 15 hours depending on them.
 
Back
Top