So if you have 50 hours dual received and let's say 30 PIC wouldn't make too much of a diference for the Regionals since they don't specifically require Multi PIC
Nice! I've never heard of the EMB-110 being used for skydiving ops. Cool gig.
My only questions is this: does the aircraft require an SIC? I believe a twin otter is about the same size (in terms of weight) and I'm pretty sure skydive operators only use one pilot in that aircraft.
In the worst case scenario, couldn't he log as dual received? Of course the other guy needs to be an MEI.
Not unless he's getting instruction. Good luck defending that one when flying skydivers at the same time.
Im pretty sure that a EMB-110 would permit a SIC being that they were used by some regional airlines in the past, and as for the operation, who would decide that...the operator or FAA.
It depends on the weight and types of operation. 12,500lbs or greater requires and SIC. But AMF operates aircraft that are greater than 12500lbs single pilot.
Don't quote me though.
Im pretty sure that a EMB-110 would permit a SIC being that they were used by some regional airlines in the past, and as for the operation, who would decide that...the operator or FAA.
12500 and greater requires a type, not an SIC (KingAir 350 for example).
Im pretty sure that a EMB-110 would permit a SIC being that they were used by some regional airlines in the past, and as for the operation, who would decide that...the operator or FAA.
Nor do the airlines, but they seem to think they can define what is PIC and what isn't. Besides, the FAA bends to the insurance industry all the time; hence the note in the FARs allowing multi solo PIC time to be logged with an instructor aboard.The operator and insurance can say there needs to be 2 pilots up front, but they have no standing as far as the legality of logging flight time.