Interesting 757/767 trivia

"The 757/767 can't track a raw VOR radial. Only a LOC or a RNAV track"

I beg to differ. Though I'm sure it's only semantics.

The 757/767 can receive VOR's just fine. It's called "raw data" and it's what you get if you go to manual tuning on the MCP and enter a VOR freq and course. I think that automatically takes you out of map mode on your EHSI, as well, or maybe you have to select it, I can't remember. Anyway, you could "track" a VOR course using heading select just fine. But that's different from putting in a radial in the FMC. You can build a VOR radial in the FMC and use LNAV, too, but that's not "raw data" VOR signals. Of course, the FMC only understands a "course to", so in that respect, you kind of have to trick it into tracking a radial outbound by converting that into a "course to" fix. Which is what I think you mean by RNAV course.
 
We have Pegasus on the 767's and what UPS calls the "classic" FMC on the 757's. Pegasus is better. You have to know both, which kinda sucks. As does knowing two airframes and three engines.
 
Staplegun -- I might get to do *part* of that trip. The IOE planner is saying that I need four ocean crossings with two different captains so...
 
There's hope! Real autothrottles actually work a lot better than that! :)
 
Wow, you guys are in white data on VOR approaches? I know you said it's per ops procedures, but do you know why?


PF is in white needles on a VOR...PNF has to be in green. Not really sure why, but the white needles are MUCH more accurate. Not really interested in the WHY of it though. All I know is that it makes my life easier and the FAA signed off on it!!!
 
Back
Top