meritflyer
Well-Known Member
Why is it that turbine engines are so much more reliable than piston?
What's the mechanics behind the two?
What's the mechanics behind the two?
Time out here folks....
According to the passengers on the Beech 1900, the PT6 a turbine engine is being powered by either ...
A) Rubber Bands
or
B) Hamsters.
Aren't the passengers always right?
Time out here folks....
According to the passengers on the Beech 1900, the PT6 a turbine engine is being powered by either ...
A) Rubber Bands
or
B) Hamsters.
Aren't the passengers always right?
fewer*
zing!
Come on man, it's squirrels! Some lady was complaining about how small our plane as she was boarding in LaGarbage and I had to deplane to speak with the fueler. The FA asked where I was going and I told her I had to check on the squirrels to make sure they had plenty of acorns to spin the engines all the way to Charlotte.
On the internal company site people were talking about the standard "it's such a small plane" remark. The highlights...
-Nope, it's just that your wife's (err...) backside is really big.
-A lot bigger then your Pinto.
-It isn't small when I shove it up your.... (care of a TYS FO. Those hillbillies)
-Small town, small plane.
Some people never cease to amaze me.
The turbine engine has less moving parts.
If Honda made an aircraft piston engine it would be the end to all turbines. It would be a 4 piston 3.0 that would use 4gph![]()
The PT6 has a failure rate of 1 per 333,333 flight hours.