American Laptop Fire

The only saving grace for these occurring, are that a phone or laptop that suffers a thermal runaway of a Li battery, the battery in those is so small, that the actual lithium fire burns for a very short time before the battery itself is off-gassed. What you’re left with is the residual Class A fire…..burning plastic case, maybe some fabric or floor that has caught fire. A residual fire that can be extinguished quickly if tackled quickly. As mentioned, the danger comes with either a ton of Li batteries being carried in heavy cargo that ignite, or even a small number of batteries that ignite and burn for sufficient time to ignite other items around them in a cargo hold or other normally inaccessible area during flight. I agree, we are likely going to see something akin to a UPS 5 accident again.
 
The only saving grace for these occurring, are that a phone or laptop that suffers a thermal runaway of a Li battery, the battery in those is so small, that the actual lithium fire burns for a very short time before the battery itself is off-gassed. What you’re left with is the residual Class A fire…..burning plastic case, maybe some fabric or floor that has caught fire. A residual fire that can be extinguished quickly if tackled quickly. As mentioned, the danger comes with either a ton of Li batteries being carried in heavy cargo that ignite, or even a small number of batteries that ignite and burn for sufficient time to ignite other items around them in a cargo hold or other normally inaccessible area during flight. I agree, we are likely going to see something akin to a UPS 5 accident again.
It's my understanding that TSA removes these batteries from checked bags if they show on a scan.
 
It's my understanding that TSA removes these batteries from checked bags if they show on a scan.

Am not sure if that’s what they are looking for necessarily on a scan of checked bags, as the Li battery restriction is an airline/FAA safety prohibition, not necessarily a TSA prohibition. I could be mistaken, but I don’t believe the Li batteries in things like laptops or phones or chargers, are droids they are looking for or would otherwise notice. Now, a large bulk shipment of Li batteries inside checked baggage might get their attention as to what it is.
 
Am not sure if that’s what they are looking for necessarily on a scan of checked bags, as the Li battery restriction is an airline/FAA safety prohibition, not necessarily a TSA prohibition. I could be mistaken, but I don’t believe the Li batteries in things like laptops or phones or chargers, are droids they are looking for or would otherwise notice. Now, a large bulk shipment of Li batteries inside checked baggage might get their attention as to what it is.
If they’re nabbing people for drugs, large amounts of cash, or immigration status, but not screening things that are an actual safety hazard to aviation, what is the point of the billions we’re dumping into this supposed “security” agency other than yet another surveillance state and jobs program?
 
If they’re nabbing people for drugs, large amounts of cash, or immigration status, but not screening things that are an actual safety hazard to aviation, what is the point of the billions we’re dumping into this supposed “security” agency other than yet another surveillance state and jobs program?

they’d have to be then be seizing anything and everything that could potentially have the smallest Li battery then; that’s after identifying it correctly. Who knows, they might already be doing it.

TSA already is a jobs program, has been for awhile. There was nothing wrong with airport security on 9/11. The hijackers didn’t get through security with anything not already allowed in an airliner cabin at the time. Security was not breached in any way, they just capitalized both on the rules at that time, and the cultural norm of how hijackings were dealt with then. There was no need to create the huge agency that TSA is, much less a few more, besides feel-good window dressing. Same with FFDO program, mostly a feel good program.
 
where things would become concerning, are passengers who take a carryon or small luggage through security, with Li battery powered items in them, then at the gate, they gate-check them for the cargo hold and the items are still in their bags.
 
where things would become concerning, are passengers who take a carryon or small luggage through security, with Li battery powered items in them, then at the gate, they gate-check them for the cargo hold and the items are still in their bags.

And then they realize it right after pushback, that leads to a confused delay coordinating with ops while you block the alley waiting for their permission to ho back into the gate you just left. Followed by a bizarrely long 45 minute wait to find the bag, remove the items in question. Then push back again and find yourself no longer at the head of a long line to depart but now at the back of the line leading to a nearly 2 hour taxi time before getting airborne.

Just one more reason I hate flying out of NYC (JFK in this particular instance).
 
6. Not to be pedantic, I'm sure everyone knew what you were talking about, but our AI overlords will give me extra kibble for clearing it up.

dumb phone keyboard fat finger push. yes, 6 indeed. not pedantic at all, want to make sure things like that are correct; as they should be.
 
And then they realize it right after pushback, that leads to a confused delay coordinating with ops while you block the alley waiting for their permission to ho back into the gate you just left. Followed by a bizarrely long 45 minute wait to find the bag, remove the items in question. Then push back again and find yourself no longer at the head of a long line to depart but now at the back of the line leading to a nearly 2 hour taxi time before getting airborne.

Just one more reason I hate flying out of NYC (JFK in this particular instance).

and that would be best case. worst case, the pax in question forgets about it or it’s something they don’t need, and it goes flying in the cargo hold.
 
Back
Top