welcome to end-stage capitalism, and largely why we are where we are.
SF Chron link. Is everything pay for these days…
Can you say en•tification on herewelcome to end-stage capitalism, and largely why we are where we are.
Apparently even that has been en•ified. xPCan you say en•tification on here
Are they: a) six feet under or b) doing time in Leavenworth, or c) flying rubber dog poop out of HK?And yet we still have assbag “air carriers” that float around considering reserve as rest.
Way back in the day, outfits used to play all kinds of lame ass games. There was a local school that played the 1099 game with CFIs, who were expected to be in on a specified schedules and man the desk/phones.
Some rando kid dropped dime to the federal taxation authorities and who landed on the owner like a ton of cat litter.
Skip to the end, kid’s compatriots turned on them for blowing up their flying opportunity.
No good deed goes unpunished.
www.nbcbayarea.com
“Officials at the FAA and at SFO confirmed a previous ban on parallel approaches will be "slightly revised" to now included staggered arrivals…
The new rules will allow, weather permitting, up to 42 aircrafts [sic] per hour, six more than before the change, but still less than what the airport maintained with parallel landings. It comes at a time when SFO is operating with reduced capacity because of ongoing maintenance to its runways, with one currently being used as a taxiway while the others alternating between landings and takeoffs.
Doug Yakel, the airport's spokesperson, confirmed the new staggered arrivals procedure is starting Wednesday. Airplanes will be arriving at staggered times, alternating which runway they use, which will help increase the number of landings and takeoffs in a limited timeframe.”
![]()
FAA announces plans to partially roll back SFO restrictions, allow more landings
Restrictions placed on operating procedures at SFO will be revised by the FAA, potentially increasing the number of aircraft that can be processed.www.nbcbayarea.com
It seems like staggering parallel landings would increase controller workload versus concurrent clearances that are likely to be staggered, by chance.
The issue with the parallel approaches was that you easily got TCAS hits. Most airlines historically were allowed to go TA only with the pairing traffic in sight, but one particular airline that makes up the majority (or at least a plurality) of traffic at SFO changed that last year ish and started doing a lot of go arounds due to RAs, even with the shallower glide slope on 28L, they revamped the FMS Bridge Visual, still didn’t fix the issue and so here we are.So far it seems the recent issues at SFO have been related to occupied runways, not collisions during the approach.
Unless just he goal is trying to get arrival rates down and reduce controller workload.
It barely doesIt's hard for me to imagine a major airport like SFO being limited to 42 planes an hour. I don't see how it can keep functioning.