MTV's The Real World Guy and DEI Hiring

How can you take half of your requirement newhires
you don’t, you read into things beyond conservative twitter and realize its a target FOR THE GRADUATION RATE AT THE COMPANY OWNED FLIGHT SCHOOL.

200(?) pilots a year, if they make it through the program, to get into a regional, and god knows how many don’t get dumped out of the program in the subsequent years. And right wing twitter acts like there’s a direct entry captain flow from HBCUs to mainline ground school.
 
Man, I got nothin'. Not going to defend schmooze-based hiring, but even the horrors of DEI ain't enough to get me hired, so ... I only have two years left til involuntary retirement due to my passport anyway, heh.

This timeline is a nightmare. Humans were a mistake.
 
But that’s the point though.


How can you take half of your requirement newhires, from a group that is only 15% of the entire pilot population? Scenario A

You can easily fill half of your requirement newhires from 85% of the entire pilot pool. Scenario B



In scenario B, you can be selective and weed out many based on failures, past history, etc. But with scenario A, you need to fill half your classes from this group and since it’s only 15% of the pilot population, you have no choice but to take the bottom barrels too.

The math isn’t mathing.
Since you mentioned “half”, it is easy to infer that you are talking about Scott Kirby. You sound like my 80+ year old father. He has asked me at least a dozen times if United is still using “DEI” for hiring. And every time he asks, I have to tell him that he needs to stop watching Fox News because they are full of •. (Sound familiar?)

Back to Kirby’s comments. This is what he said:

"Over the next decade, United will train 5,000 pilots who will be guaranteed a job with United, after they complete the requirements of the Aviate program – and our plan is for half of them to be women and people of color," said United CEO Scott Kirby. "We're excited that JPMorgan Chase has agreed to support our work to diversify our pilot ranks and create new opportunities for thousands of women and people of color who want to pursue a career in aviation."

Forget the “guaranteed a job” part and focus on the rest. They have a “plan” to “create new opportunities” for people who may not know that they can realistically become a pilot. That’s it. It is all about raising awareness that people from all walks of life can become pilots. As I explained to my dad numerous times, many kids are still shocked to see a woman or person of color at the controls when they visit the flight deck. I would think you, of all people, would understand this. But instead you choose to focus on your Fox News talking points.
 
Show me where that happens. Give me data.


I mean in general. The standard FAA answer is “certificated and qualified.”

But if you are allowed to take a test unlimited amounts of times, you’re one day going to be certificated and qualified. The CA of Colgan and the FO of Atlas (both PF when the accidents occurred) are a prime example of multiple failures throughout their careers, but passed eventually, and are considered “qualified.”
 
I mean in general. The standard FAA answer is “certificated and qualified.”

But if you are allowed to take a test unlimited amounts of times, you’re one day going to be certificated and qualified. The CA of Colgan and the FO of Atlas (both PF when the accidents occurred) are a prime example of multiple failures throughout their careers, but passed eventually, and are considered “qualified.”

So is your argument that DPEs/APDs are pushing unqualified applicants though checkrides to feed a made up narrative?

Both examples you gave, those pilots were qualified. You can retrain to standard, and pass the standard. 🤷.

Welcome to AQP bud!
 
you don’t, you read into things beyond conservative twitter and realize its a target FOR THE GRADUATION RATE AT THE COMPANY OWNED FLIGHT SCHOOL.

200(?) pilots a year, if they make it through the program, to get into a regional, and god knows how many don’t get dumped out of the program in the subsequent years. And right wing twitter acts like there’s a direct entry captain flow from HBCUs to mainline ground school.
I can’t have a serious conversation about the various ways I actually DO think the business is blowing it without some knob on EXXXXXXXXXXXXX taking it and running with it as if I agree with whatever hogwash.

Then again, those in charge (irrespective of their politics or whichever way that wind is blowing) are also not interested in my serious conversation, so I guess I’ll have the pasta and a club soda. Yes, a cup of ice too, thanks.

Like the old learn a language tapes, listen and repeat…
Except airline pilot radio work is occasionally atrocious…anyway I’ll be driving simulated trains wondering why we don’t have more CPDLC capability.

*taps standing at signal auto text message buttan*
 
So is your argument that DPEs/APDs are pushing unqualified applicants though checkrides to feed a made up narrative?

Both examples you gave, those pilots were qualified. You can retrain to standard, and pass the standard. 🤷.

Welcome to AQP bud!
Pretty sure everyone who has ever crashed a Part 121 airliner was current and qualified in accordance with the Company’s and regulator’s requirements.
 
Since you mentioned “half”, it is easy to infer that you are talking about Scott Kirby. You sound like my 80+ year old father. He has asked me at least a dozen times if United is still using “DEI” for hiring. And every time he asks, I have to tell him that he needs to stop watching Fox News because they are full of •. (Sound familiar?)

Back to Kirby’s comments. This is what he said:

"Over the next decade, United will train 5,000 pilots who will be guaranteed a job with United, after they complete the requirements of the Aviate program – and our plan is for half of them to be women and people of color," said United CEO Scott Kirby. "We're excited that JPMorgan Chase has agreed to support our work to diversify our pilot ranks and create new opportunities for thousands of women and people of color who want to pursue a career in aviation."

Forget the “guaranteed a job” part and focus on the rest. They have a “plan” to “create new opportunities” for people who may not know that they can realistically become a pilot. That’s it. It is all about raising awareness that people from all walks of life can become pilots. As I explained to my dad numerous times, many kids are still shocked to see a woman or person of color at the controls when they visit the flight deck. I would think you, of all people, would understand this. But instead you choose to focus on your Fox News talking points.
Note also that Scott Kirby rather transparently goes whichever way the wind is blowing, to an extent beyond most airline CEOs in my view. It may not be the most wholesome way to run a large, publicly traded company, but it is likely the most logical and profitable.
 
Pretty sure everyone who has ever crashed a Part 121 airliner was current and qualified in accordance with the Company’s and regulator’s requirements.

You are 100% correct.

This argument that somebody is unqualified just because they have failed checkrides is insane. Now, do we want to have the conversation that companies should look at checkride failures and maybe not hire because of that? Sure! But that's also been a qualifier for companies since I can remember.

I can say that as a DPE, I receive applicants that have failed a PPL multiple times. My job is to evaluate to the ACS. If they show up that day and meet the standard, they get their PPL. Training and checking isn't a perfect system but to imply this has anything to do with DEI just makes anyone who uses that argument, look like a complete moron.
 
You are 100% correct.

This argument that somebody is unqualified just because they have failed checkrides is insane. Now, do we want to have the conversation that companies should look at checkride failures and maybe not hire because of that? Sure! But that's also been a qualifier for companies since I can remember.

I can say that as a DPE, I receive applicants that have failed a PPL multiple times. My job is to evaluate to the ACS. If they show up that day and meet the standard, they get their PPL. Training and checking isn't a perfect system but to imply this has anything to do with DEI just makes anyone who uses that argument, look like a complete moron.
All corporate pilots pass checkrides. Its my job to make sure they do.
 
This argument that somebody is unqualified just because they have failed checkrides is insane. Now, do we want to have the conversation that companies should look at checkride failures and maybe not hire because of that? Sure! But that's also been a qualifier for companies since I can remember.
One of my friends and I always discuss it as “On-ramps, off-ramps and turnouts,” not just for proficiency and training, but for aeromedical issues and life stresses, frankly, too.
 
So uh, what does this mean for the R-ATP military comp and RTAG pilots? Because, hiring someone to check a box (veteran) is DEI hiring.

It's really just people of color and women that will be targeted. Trump is all about numbers. He will push to show his constituents that he has found a large number of people of color and women that are "unqualified" to be pilots. They truly don't care about qualifications. They just care about numbers and appearances.
 
So uh, what does this mean for the R-ATP military comp and RTAG pilots? Because, hiring someone to check a box (veteran) is DEI hiring.

I’m under the impression that RTP/RTAG has slowed a lot, possibly to a halt. I also don’t know of any people hired with R-ATP even during the big hiring surge, though I’m sure that there were. Probably just my sample group, as it was quite rare for someone in my community to be eligible to leave active duty and not also have the 1500 hrs or better. But I’d very much imagine R-ATP is a non-starter aside from maybe the regionals. I know the younger active duty guys i work with who are around 1500 hrs haven’t been getting calls. That’s a change from a couple-three-five years ago.
 
Back
Top