Autothrust Blue
”…trusting ze process…”
we don't kink shame hereIt can be stretched as much as your various cavities can be stretched during an unconstitutional search.
we don't kink shame hereIt can be stretched as much as your various cavities can be stretched during an unconstitutional search.
"TREAD ON ME BABY!"we don't kink shame here
Either Real ID is necessary for effective security and should be required or it shouldn’t. “You need this to fly unless you pay a fee” makes the security theater even more obvious.
Right. You probably had a ‘bonus’ search and some additional identity validation steps. But you were still able to do it.Last year I lost my wallet and flew home with no ID.
I mean, I'd still like to hear a good justification for why you need any ID to get on an airplane other than to confirm your ticket - which... hypothetically would be handled by the airline and not by the TSA or other security apparatus. Beyond that - somebody should be able to walk up to the counter, pay cash for a ticket, and go through security. Either the security screenings that are done are enough or they are not. If some people are so Liam Neeson dangerous that they can commit horrendous harm *after* they've gone through security with locked cockpit doors, etc. then I would posit that we have much much larger problems... If our baggage screening is that porous, then there is literally nothing we can do.Right. You probably had a ‘bonus’ search and some additional identity validation steps. But you were still able to do it.
I’m not comfortable charging a fee for that, and anyone who stops to think about it shouldn’t be either.
www.ggandd.com
I don't how walking with someone to their gate is banned, either, especially if you have an ID. How does this ban increase security? The security screening is either adequate for everyone or it's not adequate for anyone.“By the way, has enough time passed in this country that we can openly and honestly talk about the great things Osama bin Laden did for us?
And don’t act like he didn’t do anything good. How about the fact that we immediately know September is nine? That’s not nothing. That’s not noth– Do you remember what we used to do? January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August… nine. Honey, it’s nine. I use it for August. 9/11 minus one… eight.
How about the fact that every time you take your wife or your girlfriend to the airport, you no longer have to walk her all the way to the gate? Yeah, maybe next time you do a drop-off, you give him a quick, “Thanks, Osama.”
I don't how walking with someone to their gate is banned, either, especially if you have an ID. How does this ban increase security? The security screening is either adequate for everyone or it's not adequate for anyone.
And there's an exception, as I learned several years ago. I was with my pregnant, disabled girlfriend who was flying to New Zealand for her sister's wedding. I guess it was obvious to the agent at the check-in counter she could use some help because she asked if I wanted to accompany her to the gate. That was nice. But it it's an unsafe practice, why allow an exception? It's total nonsense.
I don't how walking with someone to their gate is banned, either, especially if you have an ID. How does this ban increase security? The security screening is either adequate for everyone or it's not adequate for anyone.
And there's an exception, as I learned several years ago. I was with my pregnant, disabled girlfriend who was flying to New Zealand for her sister's wedding. I guess it was obvious to the agent at the check-in counter she could use some help because she asked if I wanted to accompany her to the gate. That was nice. But it it's an unsafe practice, why allow an exception? It's total nonsense.
Pittsburgh.You've always been able to get a gate escort pass for people who need it.
Also a bunch of airports have a gate pass program where you can get a pass through security to either meet somebody or visit the shops and restaurants in the terminal. Pittsburg was actually the first airport to do it. They opened their new terminal (well, it's the old terminal that just closed this week, but it was new then) just before 9-11 and it had a huge shopping mall inside of security. They promised that the prices would the the same inside the airport as at the same stores outside the airport, and their hope was that people would treat the terminal like a big shopping mall and go hang out. 9-11 killed that, but they were able to get a gate pass program put together that allowed limited numbers of people access every day.
Points Guy as the current list of terminals that allow access:
![]()
Which airports will welcome you into the terminal without a plane ticket? - The Points Guy
More than a dozen U.S. airports now have programs that invite nonticketed guests to apply for free passes that grant permission to go through airport security and spend time in the terminal.thepointsguy.com
It’s nothing to do with being unsafe.
After 9/11 and the creation of the TSA it became a requirement to verify any person going through the checkpoint against the various watchlists that were created. TSA didn’t want to do the verification, claiming they didn’t have the staffing or budget. And so it was passed on the airlines who were already set up to do the same for passengers. But airlines didn’t want to spend money on setting up easy ways to get passes because, well, it cost them money and were in the throngs of laying off thousands of staff.
And so we have the system we have. Of course, now that we live in a surveillance police state and all TSA needs to do it take your picture and don’t even look at your boarding pass anymore I’m sure they’ve already automated doing comparisons at the checkpoint the various lists so it’s not really necessary. Except of course for the fact that it would just cause even more delays at the checkpoint most of the time especially as all the friends and family would “forget” that they have prohibited items on their person and make for delightfully longer lines. Assuming the TSA notices with their already low detection scores…
You've always been able to get a gate escort pass for people who need it.
Also a bunch of airports have a gate pass program where you can get a pass through security to either meet somebody or visit the shops and restaurants in the terminal. Pittsburg was actually the first airport to do it. They opened their new terminal (well, it's the old terminal that just closed this week, but it was new then) just before 9-11 and it had a huge shopping mall inside of security. They promised that the prices would the the same inside the airport as at the same stores outside the airport, and their hope was that people would treat the terminal like a big shopping mall and go hang out. 9-11 killed that, but they were able to get a gate pass program put together that allowed limited numbers of people access every day.
Points Guy as the current list of terminals that allow access:
![]()
Which airports will welcome you into the terminal without a plane ticket? - The Points Guy
More than a dozen U.S. airports now have programs that invite nonticketed guests to apply for free passes that grant permission to go through airport security and spend time in the terminal.thepointsguy.com
The TSA is a joke and identity checks are kabuki theater.
Doesn’t the system make air travel safer? This is the classic “three lock problem”. Three locks offer more security than two locks but how much more?
We let felons fly and don’t check for active warrants. How about the No Fly List and folks on the Terrorist Watch List? 99.99% of those folks have no active warrants in any country and would not be subject to legal action if they were known to be in the United States.
Does being on the No Fly List or even the Terrorist Watch List prevent you from clearing customs if you arrive in the US? No. Customs has access to the lists but aren’t bound to deny entry to someone on the list. Does being on the list prohibit one from buying a firearm or explosives? No.
This is silly stuff. Screen for weapons and let folks sell tickets on StubHub.
Nah. NOPE.View attachment 86858
...we promise.
I mean not to sound like Cereal Killer but our names go through all these computers a day, man...
Pittsburgh.
Pittsburg (no h) is a city in California.
There was a time where the latter spelling was generally accepted (which is why Pburg, CA is spelled same). That is interesting.Just checked... my phone auto corrects Pittsburgh to Pittsburg. Odd.
There was a time where the latter spelling was generally accepted (which is why Pburg, CA is spelled same). That is interesting.