Skåning
Well-Known Member
Glass Pakistani houses...Um Sir, this is India. You’re getting a rickety rickshaw with a 30 gallon water tank, a leaky water hose, and a used N95 mask.![]()
Glass Pakistani houses...Um Sir, this is India. You’re getting a rickety rickshaw with a 30 gallon water tank, a leaky water hose, and a used N95 mask.![]()
Saw this just now on IG. Doesn't look like the switches could have been turned off a second apart.
View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DL_qLnTuNPi/?igsh=bHIxbmpsM2twZnFq
I am confused because the video is literally both switches being moved approximately one second apart. And that was with one hand holding a camera.
Sounds like someone turned the fuel switches off.
Glass Pakistani houses...
No, it’s addressed in the prelim report. Engines were at takeoff thrust until the switches were cutoff.
Same. Although I knew it wasn't a Boeing issue, I think most did. That initial BS ChatGPT report saying that water from the GPU was ingested and fried both FADECs was so crazy but lots of people bought into it. Hell, half of my VX new hire chat group argued with me that this was for sure the issue and AI was figuring out how to soften the blow against Boeing so they could get discounts on aircraft orders lol.NTSB moved to transfer the investigation to the FBI. The Egyptians refused. The NTSB knew the FO crashed the aircraft intentionally. They didn't know why. I wouldn't be surprised if this happens with this crash as well.
Frankly I'm just happy this isn't a Boeing issue. For numerous reasons.
Couldn’t the Airbus fuel switches be cutoff even with thrust levers in ROGA/FLX/CL ?
Same. Although I knew it wasn't a Boeing issue, I think most did. That initial BS ChatGPT report saying that water from the GPU was ingested and fried both FADECs was so crazy but lots of people bought into it. Hell, half of my VX new hire chat group argued with me that this was for sure the issue and AI was figuring out how to soften the blow against Boeing so they could get discounts on aircraft orders lol.
Did I miss that? Honest question. I read it as "the airplane reached a speed of 180kts and the switches were turned to cutoff"
I read it on my phone yesterday and I was exhausted so I am sure I missed it.
View attachment 84478
States that the engine N1 and N2 began to decrease only after the fuel supply was cut off. That seems to me to indicate that the thrust had not decreased ahead of time.
Also of note, time between air/ground sensors moving to air mode and fuel cutoff was 3 seconds. 3 seconds is a lot quicker than people want to realize. It takes you longer to read this this post than that time.
You should have heard his rant about Alaska and autobrakes. He flies on us regularly lol.
Yep, we are the only ones that have issues because we are the only ones that overcomplicate it and NOBODY seems to understand it here. So weird.
Yet I jumpseated on Delta and they did AB3 on a 737-900ER at LAX on a dry runway with a 10 knot headwind.
Sometimes you just can’t win.
That is nutty of the highest order lol.
Laughs in Max anti ice making engines go poof
At least you’d have to be at idle to cutoff fuel right?Laughs in CRJ where the thrust levels ARE the fuel cut off switches.
Wasn’t that part of that challenger crash? And I think I heard one of the pilots was ex-ASLaughs in CRJ where the thrust levels ARE the fuel cut off switches.